<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Faker</id>
	<title>DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Faker"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php/Special:Contributions/Faker"/>
	<updated>2026-07-14T17:09:19Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18375</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18375"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:50:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chapters filled, and images and references added.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the relevance for both the course and a practitioner is more clear, now the article is finished. Also, I hope that &amp;quot;Applications&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; has given some depth and perspective to the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18374</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18374"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:50:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chapters filled, and images and references added.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the relevance for both the course and a practitioner is more clear, now the article is finished. Also, I hope that &amp;quot;Applications&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; has given some depth and perspective to the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18373</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18373"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:50:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chapters filled, and images and references added.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the relevance for both the course and a practitioner is more clear, now the article is finished. Also, I hope that &amp;quot;Applications&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; has given some depth and perspective to the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18372</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18372"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:49:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 3, s121408 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Chapters filled, and images and references added.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the relevance for both the course and a practitioner is more clear, now the article is finished. Also, I hope that &amp;quot;Applications&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; has given some depth and perspective to the article.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18371</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18371"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:47:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter will suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18370</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18370"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:47:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Reviewer 2: s141586 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I added a few semi-relevant figures, as well as some references.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I hope the applications chapter gave more meaning to the topic. I also threw in some relevant cites. I hope the &amp;quot;Limitations&amp;quot; chapter can suffice for the lack of a discussion :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18369</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18369"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:43:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Review given by StephSalling, review1 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;I think I managed to get some proper references and cites :)&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18368</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18368"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:41:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Formal aspects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18367</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18367"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:41:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Formal aspects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18366</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18366"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:40:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Review given by StephSalling, review1 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18365</id>
		<title>Talk:Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=18365"/>
		<updated>2015-09-29T15:39:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Formal aspects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Review given by StephSalling, review1 ==&lt;br /&gt;
The TOC method is very interesting and you are explaining it in a good and simple way. It is really a shame that the last sections are missing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Formal aspects ==== &lt;br /&gt;
* The “method” structure is being followed very well (apart from the last parts not existing yet).&lt;br /&gt;
* Grammar, spelling and punctuation – very good! &lt;br /&gt;
* Sentences are short and precise, which make the article easy and engaging to read. &lt;br /&gt;
* Adding some illustrations would improve the  reading experience.&lt;br /&gt;
* The use of different bullet point styles is good. It could be a good idea to link to some other wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last parts have been added along with a couple of illustrations. I have also added links to relevant wiki-pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Content aspects ====&lt;br /&gt;
* I would say that the article is very interesting for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
* The topic of the article is clear and specific.&lt;br /&gt;
* It seems that there is (going to be) a logical flow through the article, but it is of course hard to say when only half of it is written.&lt;br /&gt;
* The starting summary of the “big idea” is sufficient and not too long.&lt;br /&gt;
* It looks like you have attempted to put in references but not succeeded (yet), which makes it hard to judge the sources and objectivity of the article (although it seems very objective).&lt;br /&gt;
* It could maybe be beneficial to link the article to other pages in the APPPM wiki (such as pages with the topic of LEAN?)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reviewer 2: s141586 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is an interesting topic and it has a good flow, but it needs some improvement. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is a method definition. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The use of English is correct. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The style of the article is short and concise; maybe too much, some extra explanation of the theory would be helpful. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It lacks figures. Some figures would help to make it more comprehensive. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The article is well formatted, but it is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Missing references. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is an interesting topic for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to understand if this theory is applied in Project Management, Program, Portfolio or everywhere. Where is it used? What are its benefits? Can it be applied to software development, for instance? &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	The length of the article is under the standard of 3000 words, but it seems that the article is still in progress. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	In general it has a good focus and flow, however it needs more development and a deeper insight. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It seems that the main reference is Wikipedia, maybe would be a good idea to find some academic papers about the topic so you can find different approaches or ways of explaining, and also some clarifying figures. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	Lacks annotated bibliography. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	It is not linked to other APPPM articles. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
•	There is not a subjective statement from the author; maybe a “discussion” section would be interesting. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Reviewer 3, s121408==&lt;br /&gt;
Formal:&lt;br /&gt;
*The grammar and punctuation is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
*There are chapters empty.&lt;br /&gt;
* The language is clear and describe properly the tool.&lt;br /&gt;
*No proper refernce given in the text.&lt;br /&gt;
*No images shown. Images can improve the content of the article so I would suggest to add some.&lt;br /&gt;
Content:&lt;br /&gt;
*There is a good flow of the arguments&lt;br /&gt;
*There is not enough number of words.&lt;br /&gt;
* There is no clear relation between portfolio management course and your tool. I would suggest to use the concept given in class to approach this tool to portfolio/program/project management.&lt;br /&gt;
* As there is no clear connection with management portfolio I do not really see relevant for a practitioner.&lt;br /&gt;
*It is not well seem the author contribution to the topic. It seems just a description of a tool without any perspective or analysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17689</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17689"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:08:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: A collection of publishings by Goldratt on the theory of constraints. Relevant for those who wants to read more in depth about TOC.&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: This is Goldratt&#039;s first publishing about the theory of constraints. It explains the premises and application of TOC. Very relevant for whomever is interested in TOC.&lt;br /&gt;
;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
: This is a paper that outlines the theory of constraints and applies it in mostly a financial approach. Relevant for those who want a quick overview of the theory.&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: The book is explaining the methodology behind in more depth, so this is for the reader who wants to know more about this specific approach and thus it does not revolve around TOC itself.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17682</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17682"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:05:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: A collection of publishings by Goldratt on the theory of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: This is Goldratt&#039;s first publishing about the theory of constraints. It explains the premises and application of TOC.&lt;br /&gt;
;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
: This is a paper that outlines the theory of constraints and applies it in mostly a financial approach.&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: The book is explaining the methodology behind in more depth, so this is for the reader who wants to know more about this specific approach and thus it does not revolve around TOC itself.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17677</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17677"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T22:03:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: &lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
: This is a paper that outlines the theory of constraints and applies it in mostly a financial approach.&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: The book is explaining the methodology behind in more depth, so this is for the reader who wants to know more about this specific approach and thus it does not revolve around TOC itself.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17646</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17646"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:56:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: &lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17639</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17639"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:55:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: &lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17636</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17636"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:54:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
: lalal&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press.&lt;br /&gt;
* McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17581</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17581"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:37:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17577</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17577"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:35:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Annotated bibliography */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17560</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17560"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:28:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|450px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17556</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17556"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:28:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint.  By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense. [[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17554</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17554"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:27:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. [[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]] By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17553</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17553"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:27:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17548</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17548"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:26:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plant structures */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17545</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17545"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:26:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plant structures===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plant structures in the theory of constraints. The type of plant structure allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17540</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17540"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:24:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:five.jpg|400px|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Five.jpg&amp;diff=17539</id>
		<title>File:Five.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Five.jpg&amp;diff=17539"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:24:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17537</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17537"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:24:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:five.jpg|thumb|The five focusing steps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17536</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17536"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:23:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* The five focusing steps */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Chain.jpg&amp;diff=17534</id>
		<title>File:Chain.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Chain.jpg&amp;diff=17534"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:22:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17533</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17533"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:22:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Big idea */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:chain.jpg|thumb|“A chain is no stronger than its weakest link”]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17526</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17526"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:20:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Buffers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17523</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17523"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:20:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Buffers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|550px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17522</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17522"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:19:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Buffers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|500px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17521</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17521"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:19:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Buffers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|600px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17520</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17520"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:19:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17518</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17518"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:18:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|600px|thumb|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17516</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17516"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:17:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|600px|thumb|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17515</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17515"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:17:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|800px|thumb|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17513</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17513"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:17:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17511</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17511"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:15:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|50px|frame|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17510</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17510"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:15:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|100px|frame|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17506</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17506"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:15:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|300px|frame|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17504</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17504"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:15:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|500px|frame|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17503</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17503"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:15:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|800px|frame|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17501</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17501"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:14:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|300px|border|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17496</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17496"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:12:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|300px|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17495</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17495"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|300px|thumb|right|Different types of plant structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Plants.jpg&amp;diff=17490</id>
		<title>File:Plants.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Plants.jpg&amp;diff=17490"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:10:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17486</id>
		<title>Theory of Constraints</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Theory_of_Constraints&amp;diff=17486"/>
		<updated>2015-09-28T21:08:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Faker: /* Types of plants */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Big idea==&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints (TOC) is a management paradigm that advocates improvement of a system by looking at constraints rather than the opportunities. The big idea of the theory is best described with the idiom: “a chain is no stronger than its weakest link”, meaning that the performance of the system is no greater than the limits of its constraints. System performance improvement is thus achieved by adjusting the system to the most limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Key assumptions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An assumption about the management of organizations has to be made in order to apply the theory of constraints. It is assumed that the work of organizations can be measured by looking at three key measures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Throughput&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the rate at which the system generates revenue (e.g. the quantity of sold goods).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Inventory&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money invested in the purchase of materials required to generate revenue (e.g. purchase of raw materials, outsourced components, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Operational expense&#039;&#039;&#039;, which is the money spent on turning inventory into throughput (e.g. rent of factory, employee pay, costs of running machinery, etc.). &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1990). Essays on the Theory of Constraints. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some necessary conditions must be met before applying the theory of constraints. Issues of safety, quality, legal obligations, etc. must be satisfied and cannot be included in the analysis of constraint. Where the goal for many organizations is to generate revenue, for NGOs it is a necessary condition to sustain themselves by making money. As a consequence of this, it is of utmost importance to possess financial expertise when making decisions regarding throughput, inventory, and operational expense. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;essays&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Concepts of TOC==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five focusing steps===&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constraints assumes that the performance of a system is limited in achieving its goals by at least one constraint. By identifying the most limiting constraint, improvements to the performance of the system can be introduced. Examples of system improvements can be either to increase the throughput or to decrease the operational expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The five focusing steps describe the process of applying the theory of constraints:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Identify the constraint(s) of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Decide how to utilize the constraint(s) in order to improve the system.&lt;br /&gt;
# Make the exploit of the constraint(s) a top priority and rearrange the rest of the system to the previous decision.&lt;br /&gt;
# Implement the changes and dissolve the limiting constraint(s).&lt;br /&gt;
# Be aware whether a constraint has been broken in the previous steps. If so, begin the process from step 1 again. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1984). The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The steps are designed to focus on the constraints of a system in order to improve it by recognizing and utilizing them to the advantage of the system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basically, a constraint can be anything that limits the performance of a system and prevents a it from attaining its goals. Constraint can take many shapes and be found in many place, but within the theory of constraints only the most limiting constraints are taken into consideration. Internal constraints are evident when the system is incapable of satisfying a given market. The removing of an internal constraint will allow for a greater throughput and thus attempt to satisfy the market. External constraints are evident when the demand from a given market is less than the capacity of the system. In this case, measures must be made in an attempt to increase the demand for its throughput. Another external constraint could be the lack of raw material or outsourced components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, internal constraints include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
;Equipment&lt;br /&gt;
: - Insufficient number of machines.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poorly utilized equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Understaffed work stations.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Outdated equipment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;People&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of skilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Underskilled employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of motivation among the employees.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Poor work environment, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
;Policy&lt;br /&gt;
: - Behavior patterns.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Lack of information.&lt;br /&gt;
: - Assumptions, etc.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;McNair, C. J. (1999) Theory of Constraints (TOC) Management System Fundamentals. Institute of Management Accountants.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Broken constraints===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A constraint is said to be broken when it seizes to be the limiting factor of the system. Breaking a constraint is thus equivalent to having successfully removed the constraint for the system, and the five focusing steps will now allow for location and erradication of the next limiting constraint.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Buffers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In production, a constraint in the form of a bottleneck can often be alleviated by placing buffers before and after the constraint itself. A buffer is like a small inventory filled with work in progress parts just waiting to be processed by the constraint. By doing so, the constraint is assured to continue production despite failures elsewhere in the production facility. Placing a buffer behind the constraint secures the constraint from being affected by breakdowns and failures further down the production line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to utilize non-physical buffers when it comes to e.g. project management. Properly scheduling and insertion of &amp;quot;time-buffers&amp;quot; can avert probable delays or setbacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Types of plants===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are four different types of plants in the theory of constraints. The type of plant allows for potentially easier location of constraints. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:plants.jpg|150px|thumb|right|Fig 3: Complicated and simple domains. Source: Author]]&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;I-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows in a single line until it is finished. The constraint is the machine or step in production with the longest process time. An example could be the production of screws and nails.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;A-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from several lines to a converging point becoming a single product. The constraint is often found in the converging point as synchonization of materials/parts from different lines can become an issue. If the converging point is not adequately fed with required materials/parts, unnecessary waiting time will occur. An simple example could be the production of tables and chairs (requiring table tops, seat, and legs for both).&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;V-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The material flows from a single source to become many different products. The constraint is often what is referred to as &amp;quot;robbing&amp;quot; where one subsequent work station will drain the majority of materials/parts, leaving other subsequent work stations starving for input. Correctly monitoring and managing the diverging point will aid in avoid this constraint. An example could be a steel manufacturer, producing both rods and sheets from ore.&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;T-plant&#039;&#039;&#039;: The general material flow is as described for the I-plant, but the T-plant produces many different products using some if not all the same components, but in different combinations or assemblies. The constraint can be similar to that of both the A-plant and the V-plant. An example could be a computer (or just electronics) manufacturer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are the primary bases for plant types. They can be brought together in a number of ways for specific systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Applications==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The theory of constaints can be applied to a wide variety of industries including production, marketing, supply chain management, administration, and project management. Whereever there is a need for optimization of processes or activities, the theory of constraints can be applied if modified appropiately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of utilizing the theory of constraints is manyfold, examples being:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decreased production lead times.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved quality of products and services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Dramatic increases in profitability.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced inventory levels.&lt;br /&gt;
* Reduced bottlenecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* Management of constraints.&lt;br /&gt;
* Curbing of statistical fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
* Improved competitive position.&lt;br /&gt;
* facilitation of strategic marketing and operational decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
* Introduction of the marginal pricing concept.&lt;br /&gt;
* Application of continuous improvement at the supply chain level.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ima&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project management===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the theory of constraints, most projects can easily be viewed as A-plants, where a number of different tasks need to come together for a single deliverable. This can be useful for discovering time schedule-related bottlenecks and deal with them accordingly, e.g. by making sure to implement appropriate buffers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This approach to project management can additionally be coupled with [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Critical_chain_project_management_(CCPM) Critical Chain Project Management], as this concept removes the implicit assumption of infinite capacity as opposed to the standard concepts of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_path_method Critical Path Method (CPM)] and [http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Program_evaluation_and_review_technique_(PERT) Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT)]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Goldratt, Eliyahu M. (1997). Critical Chain. North River Press. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Limitations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major part of the theory of constraints is the identification of constraints because this is the basis for the rest of the work done (the five focusing steps). If the most limiting constraint is linked to other constraints in the system, and the practitioner is unable to map this in the identification step, there is a high risk of spending unnecessary time and resources trying to elevate constraints that are irrelevant to the achievement of goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking at the 3rd step of the five focusing steps, rearranging the entire system around one constraint may create even worse constraints elsewhere in the system. Only focusing on the single most damaging constraint can divert attention from areas in which the next constraint may be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constant search for constraints to be elevated can only be satisfied once the system is indeed perfect, which will never happen. There are simply too many impacts on a system, both internal and external, to achieve perfection, and thus long-run considerations and the improvement of non-constrained areas might be neglected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporate strategies are not taken into account either and what seems like apparent solutions might end up leading organizations away from other goals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Annotated bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Faker</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>