DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]

Talk:Optimism bias, Strategic Misinterpretation and Reference Class Forecasting (RCF)

2019-02-19T13:18:12Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| In general good - there are only a few spelling mistakes |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| In general good - there are only a few spelling mistakes
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The topics you chose could have been briefly described in the abstract as a summary
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs elaboration
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Make sure you define a clear and specific focus for your article. It is always better to choose something very specific and do an in-depth analysis of the tool/theory/concept, than to cover many and only scratch the surface. Also relate it to either project, program or portfolio management
|-
|'''References'''|| Good references
|-

|}

Talk:Leadership vs. management

2019-02-19T13:06:01Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good. The text is coherent |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The distinction between leadership..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good. The text is coherent
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The distinction between leadership and management is well described but no tool/theory/concept is described at the moment
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| At the moment the subject is not related to project, program or portfolio management and make sure you clearly define the scope of the article
|-
|'''References'''|| Some references missing. Check the guidelines for references from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Communication and Media Richness Assurance in High-performance Projects

2019-02-19T12:40:13Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Very good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| I would recommend you to add a brief description o..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Very good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| I would recommend you to add a brief description of the Media Richness Theory (MRT), that you are focusing on. Perhaps you can leave the first part of the abstract to the introduction. The abstract should be a summary of your article, stating and describing the tool/theory/concept you are analysing throughout the article.
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Designing Organizational Structure

2019-02-19T12:26:08Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elab..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| It could be relevant but make sure you keep the focus within portfolio management. It seems you are focusing more on organisational management, which is not not relevant for the curriculum
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| Make sure you clearly define the scope of the project
|}

Talk:Organisational Design and Structures

2019-02-19T12:16:19Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| It could be relevant but make sure you don't focus on organisational management but keep the focus within portfolio management. It seems that this article is more relevant for organisational management
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Prefabricated houses (industrial process)

2019-02-19T12:08:43Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract: */

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| The text is ok but it to be more coherent in some parts, specially in the "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)"
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to describe/analyse
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Make sure you choose a tool/theory/concept that is relevant to project, program or portfolio management and try to define a specific focus to do an in-depth analysis throughout the article
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Others'''|| I assumed that your abstract was under the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be as relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should also give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse.

|}

Talk:Prefabricated houses (industrial process)

2019-02-19T12:06:42Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Ok. Could be more coherent |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Ok. Could be more coherent
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Although you have a description of a prefabricated house process, there is no clear description of what tool/theory/concept you want to analyse
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated. Although you have a context/industry background, the purpose of the article is not explicit
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Make sure you choose a tool/theory/concept that is relevant to project, program or portfolio management and try to define a specific focus to do an in-depth analysis throughout the article
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references (the one you have in the abstract are not at the right place). Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Others'''|| I assumed that your abstract was the "Summary" and "Portfolio Management of prefabricated houses (Big Idea)" headings. The abstract should be a summary of your article and should have a clear description of the tool/theory/concept you want to analyse and the explanation of the article's purpose. In this kind of article, making references to the lectures might not be relevant since people from outside the class can also read it. You might also consider to write the abstract all together under a heading called "Abstract" to make it easier to read. The title should give a better idea/understanding of the tool/theory/concept related to project, program or portfolio management that you want to analyse.

|}

Talk:Organisational Design and Structures

2019-02-19T11:06:44Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| It could be relevant but make sure you keep it within portfolio management instead of organizational management/theory
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Managing projects in a functional organization

2019-02-19T11:04:44Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated. Should be more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant but make sure you keep it within project management and not about organizational management/theory.
|-
|'''References'''|| Ok
|-

|}

Talk:Negotiation Skills

2019-02-19T10:51:13Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Take a look into the punctuation |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Not enough described. Make sure you clea..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Take a look into the punctuation
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Not enough described. Make sure you clearly define the focus and describe it your tool/theory/concept.
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| The purpose is not explained
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| It can be relevant to the curriculum but at the moment it is not clearly related to project, program or portfolio management.
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing correct way of referencing. Take a look into the references guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| The abstract should be a summary of your article. Take a look into some articles in the ConceptBox to see the structure of the abstract

|}

Talk:Crisis Management when there is a Project Cost Overrun

2019-02-19T10:40:57Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| There are spelling mistakes and some sentences have to be rewritten. It needs to be more coherent and concise |- |'''Descrip..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| There are spelling mistakes and some sentences have to be rewritten. It needs to be more coherent and concise
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Needs to be elaborated and make sure you describe the focus
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Make sure you keep it within the focus of project management and not organisational management
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references on the second part of the abstract. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs and Project Management

2019-02-19T10:25:14Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Ok |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The tool/theory/concept is not enough described |- |'''Art..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| The tool/theory/concept is not enough described
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| There is no explanation of the purpose of the article
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Make sure you clearly relate it to project, program or portfolio management
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| The abstract should be a summary of your article. It should combine a description of the tool/theory/concept, its relation to project, program or portfolio management and a clear statement of the purpose of the article.

|}

DTU ProjectLab talk:The Stage-Gate Model or phase-gate process

2019-02-19T10:19:59Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Take a look into some misspelling mistakes and punctuation throughout the abstract |- |'''Description of the too..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Take a look into some misspelling mistakes and punctuation throughout the abstract
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| It is not very clear focus of the articles. at the moment it is a bit broad
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Needs to elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Make sure you link it to project management and try to define a clear focus within Decision-making to be able to do an in-depth analysis
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references

|}

Talk:SMART goals - A Project Manager Tool

2019-02-19T10:11:26Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be el..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant. Make sure you clearly relate it to project management and its relevance
|-
|'''References'''|| Don't forget to add the bibliography. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references

|}

Talk:Systems Theory in Project Management

2019-02-19T10:00:33Z

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Could be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| The topic is relevant. Make sure you keep it within project management. Also make sure you narrow down the focus within the systems theory/systems thinking. Perhaps you can focus on concept/tool and describe it more in depth.
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|}

Talk:SAFe

2019-02-19T09:41:43Z

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant. Make sure you keep it within the focus
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|}

Talk:Milestones in Project Planning

2019-02-19T09:23:22Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good but could be more coherent in some parts |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Art..."

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good but could be more coherent in some parts
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|}

Talk:Potentials of Key Performance Indicators

2019-02-19T09:18:43Z

==Feedback on Abstract:==

{|
|'''Text clarity & language'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Article purpose explanation'''|| This needs to be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum '''|| Relevant. Make sure you clearly relate it with project, program and portfolio management.
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|}

Talk:Governance of Project Management

2019-02-19T09:07:05Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good but it can be more coherent in some of the parts |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Explana..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good but it can be more coherent in some of the parts
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Make sure you keep it within project, program or portfolio and not about organizational management/theory.
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|-

|}

Talk:Project Scope Control Management

2019-02-19T08:57:51Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project Scope Control is described
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| The purpose of the article could be better articulated in the end and the focus could be narrowed down to a specific tool/method within Project Scope Control
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|-

|}

Talk:Belbin's Team Roles

2019-02-19T08:49:21Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good. |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Needs to be more elaborated |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of th..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good.
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Needs to be more elaborated
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| The purpose of the article is not quite clear
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| The topic is relevant but make sure you link it with project management and state how should it contribute/be relevant. Also, it is lacking a bit of context
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Application of Balanced Scorecard in Portfolio Management

2019-02-19T08:41:41Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good.
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. However you could better described.
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be more elaborated.
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant but make sure you keep it within Portfolio Management.
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Application of Balanced Scorecard in Portfolio Management

2019-02-19T08:34:39Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good. |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. However you could better described. |- |'''Explanation of th..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good.
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good. However you could better described.
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be more elaborated.
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:The implementation of KPIs

2019-02-19T01:37:48Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| It needs to be described |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of the ar..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| It needs to be described
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Good
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:BIM as a project management tool on construction companies

2019-02-19T01:33:37Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good but needs improvement. Also attention to punctuation and capital letters |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good but needs improvement. Also attention to punctuation and capital letters
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Good
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| Write the complete name of the method before writing only the initials. Example: Building Information Model (BIM)

|}

Talk:Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery

2019-02-19T01:25:59Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Good |- ..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Good
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|-
|'''Other'''|| It lacks a bit of context. Try to specify where this agile approach would more beneficial and its limitations

|}

Talk:Value Canvas in Projects

2019-02-19T01:18:41Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good but could be more concise |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of th..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good but could be more concise
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and needs to be related to project management.
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| At the moment it is not related to project management. Make sure you state how can the Value Canvas be relevant/important for project management and not just a design tool
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| It lacks a bit of context.

|}

Talk:Stephen Covey's seven principles

2019-02-19T01:08:12Z

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing some references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| It lacks a bit of context

|}

Talk:Vision statement

2019-02-19T01:00:36Z

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| At the moment it is not clearly related to project, program or portfolio management. And it must be application-oriented in-depth description of a particular method.
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}

Talk:Organisational Design and Structures

2019-02-19T00:48:57Z

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-
|'''Other'''|| Make sure you keep it within portfolio management instead of organizational management/theory.

|}

Talk:Conceptual levels of competence

2019-02-19T00:41:51Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good but it could be more coherent. |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project management competence is desc..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good but it could be more coherent.
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project management competence is described but could be more elaborated.
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Other'''|| At the moment, the focus of the article is bit broad and it is not clearly defined

|}

Talk:Managing projects in a functional organization

2019-02-19T00:31:23Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated. Should be more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Other'''|| Make sure you keep it within project management and not about organizational management/theory.

|}

Talk:Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects

2019-02-19T00:13:07Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Stakeholder management is described but it is missing description of the specific process/method you are focusing on
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| References can be used in the beginning to back up the abstract (and don’t forget references for the images as well).
|-
|'''Other'''|| Try to narrow down the focus. Perhaps choose a process/processes to do an in-depth description. Make sure you keep it within project management and nothing about organizational management/theory.

|}

Talk:Project Scope Control Management

2019-02-19T00:12:21Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project Scope Control is described
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| The purpose of the article could be better articulated in the end and the focus could be narrowed down to s specific tool/method within Project Scope Control
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|-

|}

Talk:Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects

2019-02-19T00:12:03Z

Raquel Valente: /* Feedback on Abstract */

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Stakeholder management is described but it is missing description of the specific process/method you are focusing on
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant
|-
|'''References'''|| References can be used in the beginning to back up the abstract (and don’t forget references for the images as well).
|-
|'''Other'''|| Try to narrow down the focus. Perhaps choose a process/processes to do an in-depth description. Make sure you keep it within project management and nothing about organizational management/theory.

|}

Talk:Project Scope Control Management

2019-02-19T00:11:16Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project Scope Control is described |- |'''Explanation of the purpose..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Project Scope Control is described
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| The purpose of the article could be better articulated in the end and the focus could be narrowed down to s specific tool/method within Project Scope Control
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Good
|-
|'''References'''|| Good
|-

|}

Talk:Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects

2019-02-18T23:38:11Z

Raquel Valente: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Stakeholder management is described but it is missing description of..."

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Stakeholder management is described but it is missing description of the specific process/method you are focusing on
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Ok
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Good
|-
|'''References'''|| References can be used in the beginning to back up the abstract (and don’t forget references for the images as well).
|-
|'''Other'''|| Try to narrow down the focus. Perhaps choose a process/processes to do an in-depth description. Make sure you keep it within project management and nothing about organizational management/theory.

|}

User:S144296

2019-02-18T10:11:29Z