<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S186465</id>
	<title>DTU ProjectLab - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://13.50.150.85/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=S186465"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php/Special:Contributions/S186465"/>
	<updated>2026-07-15T07:10:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73302</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73302"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:45:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PMBOK&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
First of all it is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders for an organization  by underlin-ing the importance of customers and of those who are defined end users. The strategies of communica-tion that should be maintained with all these actors are the basis for the creation of the value delivered to each of them.&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction the most important concepts are presented starting from the definition of the business value to whom it is addressed and who are the people in charge for a correct and effective delivery of it. The same concepts will be treated more in depth even later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project. Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered. In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the description of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PORTFOLIO&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach and an example in construction field will be considered in order to understand, in a more practical way, the concept of value and the main actors to whom it can be ad-dressed. The Agile approach allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the most important thing for realizing a good project is considering not only features as being in time, in scope or respecting costs, but also respecting what are customers wants and needs, so, in other words, the value which is provided them, and not only. It becomes necessary also to understand what the organization itself is trying to achieve with the application of Project, Program, Portfolio techniques. A lot of actors are involved in the process and each of them tries to reach a different type of value. In fact, it is possible to distinguish between internal (e.g. employees, owners) and external company’s stakeholders (e.g. customers, creditors, clients, society, government) who have different requirements and interests.&lt;br /&gt;
In order to know if what the project manager is actually doing has and creates business value, it is important to identify which is the company´s vision, which is/should be the business value provided by the project and the relationship between the two. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 1: Steps to delivering business value (Phillipy, 2014) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the project manager has to work in strict contact with the chosen team in order to create the busi-ness value required and, during all the process, measure and control it using different tools. In the graph in figure 1 the steps that a project manager has to follow are summarized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the addi-tional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to se-lect and understand the most important business processes and, therefore, those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company’s mis-sion, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its value proposition.&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus, to enable the company to achieve high successes; the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer.&#039;&#039;&#039; Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the condi-tions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The users’ adoption.&#039;&#039;&#039; It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its deliv-ery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of custom-ers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the share-holders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company busi-ness, the environmental value, health, safety.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;But, who is the main responsible for this value?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the best answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsi-ble for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantita-tively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end in order to have a global view about all the factors impacting it. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while, in case of private organ-izations, the most relevant value is increasing profits.&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (skills uplift, resource capacity, market share, cli-ent satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (brand awareness, organization’s reputation, risk exposure, compliance, and social value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|thumb|left|400px|Figure 2: Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management (Project Management Institute, 2017)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmen-tal factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philos-ophy on four main pillars:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools;&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;9&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;The Agile Manifesto (2001) by K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, et al.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprints&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. In this way it is possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed.&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Manage-ment and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration one of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredicta-bility of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by max-imizing value.&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project construc-tion model.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Koskela, L. and Howell, G., (2002). The Underlying Theory of Project Management is Obsolete. Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference, 2002, Pg. 293-302.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value delivered to the consumer and on the satisfaction of his requirements. Thus, a wide contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. &lt;br /&gt;
Lean Thinking theory is based on production processes that deliver the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuous improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of eve-rything that does not constitute added value for the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012, with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possi-ble in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders, thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;11.	ProCeedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) – CIVIL ENGINEERING, May 2011, 164, No. CE5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy; in this case of the city of London and its sur-roundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Pro-gram Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly the final results.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Q.png|thumb|right|400px|Figure 3: Priority themes Olympic games 2012 ((ICE), 2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources&#039; description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Project Management Institute Books&#039;&#039;&#039; The chapter 7 of The standard for Portfolio Management treats the portfolio value management and all the steps in the process. It underlines how this concept is central in Portfolio Management and how it can be integrated with all the other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The knowledge of the PMBOK was fundamental to integrate together all the different visions of value and project management tools and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMI articles&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to have a complete overview of the topic and of today´s ´environment´ the [https://www.pmi.org PMI site] has been fundamental. In the articles ´Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management´ and ´Achieve project success by delivering business value´ it is explained what is business value, how it is possible to achieve it and who are the main actors involved in the process starting from the project manager to the project sponsor, customers and society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Agile Manifesto&#039;&#039;&#039; It describes how/when the approach has born and which are the main characteristics of it; primarily customers´ value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Civil Engineering Journal&#039;&#039;&#039; The article at pages 5 -12 on the number 5 of the journal (May 2011) presents the example of the London Olympic games from the Program Management point of view and how, thanks to an excellent organization, it has been possible to realize this successful program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter´s book&#039;&#039;&#039; It demonstrates how companies can create and sustain a competitive ad-vantage within their industry and how managers can evaluate the competitive position of their company, carrying out actions able to improve it. The main concepts of the book can be used in order to contextualize how important can be the strategy chosen by the company and how it can be related subsequently to project, program and portfolio management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reading suggestions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the fact that the topic is very large and can involve different subjects and concepts a list of other possible articles and wiki pages related to value management can be considered as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Value stream mapping in Program Management&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Value_Stream_Mapping_in_Program_Management &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Stakeholders from a dynamic and network perspective&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Stakeholders_from_a_dynamic_and_network_perspective&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Mapping stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Mapping_stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Creating and Capturing Value: More than Just Cost Reduction&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/456572/Creating-and-Capturing-Value--More-than-Just-Cost-Reduction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Agile Tools &amp;amp; Techniques for Self-Improvement&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/515593/Agile-Tools---Techniques-for-Self-Improvement&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Q.png&amp;diff=73296</id>
		<title>File:Q.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:Q.png&amp;diff=73296"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:43:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73294</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73294"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:42:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PMBOK&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
First of all it is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders for an organization  by underlin-ing the importance of customers and of those who are defined end users. The strategies of communica-tion that should be maintained with all these actors are the basis for the creation of the value delivered to each of them.&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction the most important concepts are presented starting from the definition of the business value to whom it is addressed and who are the people in charge for a correct and effective delivery of it. The same concepts will be treated more in depth even later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project. Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered. In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the description of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PORTFOLIO&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach and an example in construction field will be considered in order to understand, in a more practical way, the concept of value and the main actors to whom it can be ad-dressed. The Agile approach allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the most important thing for realizing a good project is considering not only features as being in time, in scope or respecting costs, but also respecting what are customers wants and needs, so, in other words, the value which is provided them, and not only. It becomes necessary also to understand what the organization itself is trying to achieve with the application of Project, Program, Portfolio techniques. A lot of actors are involved in the process and each of them tries to reach a different type of value. In fact, it is possible to distinguish between internal (e.g. employees, owners) and external company’s stakeholders (e.g. customers, creditors, clients, society, government) who have different requirements and interests.&lt;br /&gt;
In order to know if what the project manager is actually doing has and creates business value, it is important to identify which is the company´s vision, which is/should be the business value provided by the project and the relationship between the two. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 1: Steps to delivering business value (Phillipy, 2014) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the project manager has to work in strict contact with the chosen team in order to create the busi-ness value required and, during all the process, measure and control it using different tools. In the graph in figure 1 the steps that a project manager has to follow are summarized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the addi-tional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to se-lect and understand the most important business processes and, therefore, those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company’s mis-sion, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its value proposition.&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus, to enable the company to achieve high successes; the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer.&#039;&#039;&#039; Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the condi-tions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The users’ adoption.&#039;&#039;&#039; It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its deliv-ery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of custom-ers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the share-holders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company busi-ness, the environmental value, health, safety.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;But, who is the main responsible for this value?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the best answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsi-ble for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantita-tively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end in order to have a global view about all the factors impacting it. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while, in case of private organ-izations, the most relevant value is increasing profits.&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (skills uplift, resource capacity, market share, cli-ent satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (brand awareness, organization’s reputation, risk exposure, compliance, and social value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|thumb|right|400px|Figure 2: Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management (Project Management Institute, 2017)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmen-tal factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philos-ophy on four main pillars:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools;&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;9&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;The Agile Manifesto (2001) by K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. van Bennekum, et al.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprints&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. In this way it is possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed.&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Manage-ment and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration one of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredicta-bility of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by max-imizing value.&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project construc-tion model.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;10&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Koskela, L. and Howell, G., (2002). The Underlying Theory of Project Management is Obsolete. Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference, 2002, Pg. 293-302.&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value delivered to the consumer and on the satisfaction of his requirements. Thus, a wide contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. &lt;br /&gt;
Lean Thinking theory is based on production processes that deliver the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuous improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of eve-rything that does not constitute added value for the customer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012, with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possi-ble in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders, thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;11&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;11.	ProCeedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) – CIVIL ENGINEERING, May 2011, 164, No. CE5&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy; in this case of the city of London and its sur-roundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Pro-gram Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly the final results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources&#039; description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Project Management Institute Books&#039;&#039;&#039; The chapter 7 of The standard for Portfolio Management treats the portfolio value management and all the steps in the process. It underlines how this concept is central in Portfolio Management and how it can be integrated with all the other areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The knowledge of the PMBOK was fundamental to integrate together all the different visions of value and project management tools and techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;PMI articles&#039;&#039;&#039; In order to have a complete overview of the topic and of today´s ´environment´ the [https://www.pmi.org PMI site] has been fundamental. In the articles ´Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management´ and ´Achieve project success by delivering business value´ it is explained what is business value, how it is possible to achieve it and who are the main actors involved in the process starting from the project manager to the project sponsor, customers and society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Agile Manifesto&#039;&#039;&#039; It describes how/when the approach has born and which are the main characteristics of it; primarily customers´ value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Civil Engineering Journal&#039;&#039;&#039; The article at pages 5 -12 on the number 5 of the journal (May 2011) presents the example of the London Olympic games from the Program Management point of view and how, thanks to an excellent organization, it has been possible to realize this successful program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter´s book&#039;&#039;&#039; It demonstrates how companies can create and sustain a competitive ad-vantage within their industry and how managers can evaluate the competitive position of their company, carrying out actions able to improve it. The main concepts of the book can be used in order to contextualize how important can be the strategy chosen by the company and how it can be related subsequently to project, program and portfolio management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reading suggestions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the fact that the topic is very large and can involve different subjects and concepts a list of other possible articles and wiki pages related to value management can be considered as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Value stream mapping in Program Management&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Value_Stream_Mapping_in_Program_Management &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
• Stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Stakeholders from a dynamic and network perspective&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Stakeholders_from_a_dynamic_and_network_perspective&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Mapping stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Mapping_stakeholders&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Creating and Capturing Value: More than Just Cost Reduction&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/456572/Creating-and-Capturing-Value--More-than-Just-Cost-Reduction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	Agile Tools &amp;amp; Techniques for Self-Improvement&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.projectmanagement.com/articles/515593/Agile-Tools---Techniques-for-Self-Improvement&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73233</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73233"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:29:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PMBOK&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
First of all it is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders for an organization  by underlin-ing the importance of customers and of those who are defined end users. The strategies of communica-tion that should be maintained with all these actors are the basis for the creation of the value delivered to each of them.&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction the most important concepts are presented starting from the definition of the business value to whom it is addressed and who are the people in charge for a correct and effective delivery of it. The same concepts will be treated more in depth even later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project. Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered. In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the description of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PORTFOLIO&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach and an example in construction field will be considered in order to understand, in a more practical way, the concept of value and the main actors to whom it can be ad-dressed. The Agile approach allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the most important thing for realizing a good project is considering not only features as being in time, in scope or respecting costs, but also respecting what are customers wants and needs, so, in other words, the value which is provided them, and not only. It becomes necessary also to understand what the organization itself is trying to achieve with the application of Project, Program, Portfolio techniques. A lot of actors are involved in the process and each of them tries to reach a different type of value. In fact, it is possible to distinguish between internal (e.g. employees, owners) and external company’s stakeholders (e.g. customers, creditors, clients, society, government) who have different requirements and interests.&lt;br /&gt;
In order to know if what the project manager is actually doing has and creates business value, it is important to identify which is the company´s vision, which is/should be the business value provided by the project and the relationship between the two. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 1: Steps to delivering business value (Phillipy, 2014) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the project manager has to work in strict contact with the chosen team in order to create the busi-ness value required and, during all the process, measure and control it using different tools. In the graph in figure 1 the steps that a project manager has to follow are summarized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the addi-tional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to se-lect and understand the most important business processes and, therefore, those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company’s mis-sion, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its value proposition.&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus, to enable the company to achieve high successes; the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer.&#039;&#039;&#039; Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the condi-tions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The users’ adoption.&#039;&#039;&#039; It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its deliv-ery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of custom-ers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the share-holders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company busi-ness, the environmental value, health, safety.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;But, who is the main responsible for this value?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the best answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsi-ble for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantita-tively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end in order to have a global view about all the factors impacting it. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while, in case of private organ-izations, the most relevant value is increasing profits.&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (skills uplift, resource capacity, market share, cli-ent satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (brand awareness, organization’s reputation, risk exposure, compliance, and social value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|thumb|right|400px|Figure 2: Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management (Project Management Institute, 2017)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Management and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredictability of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by maximizing value &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project costruction model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value given to the consumer and satisfying his requests. Thus, the contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. If we consider Lean Thinking in fact, this sees a production process that delivers the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuos improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of everything that does not constitute added value for the customer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012 with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possible in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games and the surrounding infratridges would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy in this case of the city of London and its surroundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Program Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly final results. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:K.png&amp;diff=73226</id>
		<title>File:K.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:K.png&amp;diff=73226"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:28:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: S186465 uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:K.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73216</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=73216"/>
		<updated>2019-03-04T22:26:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PMBOK&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
First of all it is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders for an organization  by underlin-ing the importance of customers and of those who are defined end users. The strategies of communica-tion that should be maintained with all these actors are the basis for the creation of the value delivered to each of them.&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction the most important concepts are presented starting from the definition of the business value to whom it is addressed and who are the people in charge for a correct and effective delivery of it. The same concepts will be treated more in depth even later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project. Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered. In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the description of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;PORTFOLIO&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach and an example in construction field will be considered in order to understand, in a more practical way, the concept of value and the main actors to whom it can be ad-dressed. The Agile approach allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact the most important thing for realizing a good project is considering not only features as being in time, in scope or respecting costs, but also respecting what are customers wants and needs, so, in other words, the value which is provided them, and not only. It becomes necessary also to understand what the organization itself is trying to achieve with the application of Project, Program, Portfolio techniques. A lot of actors are involved in the process and each of them tries to reach a different type of value. In fact, it is possible to distinguish between internal (e.g. employees, owners) and external company’s stakeholders (e.g. customers, creditors, clients, society, government) who have different requirements and interests.&lt;br /&gt;
In order to know if what the project manager is actually doing has and creates business value, it is important to identify which is the company´s vision, which is/should be the business value provided by the project and the relationship between the two. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 1: Steps to delivering business value (Phillipy, 2014) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, the project manager has to work in strict contact with the chosen team in order to create the busi-ness value required and, during all the process, measure and control it using different tools. In the graph in figure 1 the steps that a project manager has to follow are summarized. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the addi-tional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to se-lect and understand the most important business processes and, therefore, those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company’s mis-sion, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its value proposition.&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus, to enable the company to achieve high successes; the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer.&#039;&#039;&#039; Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the condi-tions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
•	&#039;&#039;&#039;The users’ adoption.&#039;&#039;&#039; It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its deliv-ery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of custom-ers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the share-holders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company busi-ness, the environmental value, health, safety.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;But, who is the main responsible for this value?&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the best answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsi-ble for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantita-tively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end in order to have a global view about all the factors impacting it. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while, in case of private organ-izations, the most relevant value is increasing profits.&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (skills uplift, resource capacity, market share, cli-ent satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (brand awareness, organization’s reputation, risk exposure, compliance, and social value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.jpg|thumb|right|400px|Figure 2: Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management (Project Management Institute, 2017)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Management and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredictability of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by maximizing value &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project costruction model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value given to the consumer and satisfying his requests. Thus, the contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. If we consider Lean Thinking in fact, this sees a production process that delivers the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuos improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of everything that does not constitute added value for the customer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012 with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possible in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games and the surrounding infratridges would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy in this case of the city of London and its surroundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Program Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly final results. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69214</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69214"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T19:35:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stakeholders and actors ==&lt;br /&gt;
A general overview of stakeholders &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Management and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredictability of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by maximizing value &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project costruction model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value given to the consumer and satisfying his requests. Thus, the contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. If we consider Lean Thinking in fact, this sees a production process that delivers the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuos improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of everything that does not constitute added value for the customer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012 with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possible in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games and the surrounding infratridges would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy in this case of the city of London and its surroundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Program Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly final results. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69213</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69213"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T19:33:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Management and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management at the beginning: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredictability of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by maximizing value &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project costruction model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value given to the consumer and satisfying his requests. Thus, the contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. If we consider Lean Thinking in fact, this sees a production process that delivers the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuos improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of everything that does not constitute added value for the customer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012 with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possible in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games and the surrounding infratridges would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy in this case of the city of London and its surroundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Program Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly final results. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69212</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=69212"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T19:29:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction: Project, Program Management and Lean Thinking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the techniques used by an organization have pros and cons. The two philosophies, Project Management and Lean Thinking, could be seen as an integration of each other or as two unrelated macro practices. By studying the field of construction it is possible to understand what was actually the greatest limitation of Project Management: the vision of the value delivered to the end user, which today, as outlined previously, has become an integral part of the success of a project together with being in time, respecting the budget and providing a high level of quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the failure of the Project Management techniques in the construction sector due to the unpredictability of time, quality and budget variables, it was necessary to develop a new approach that allowed a clear cut of waste: Lean Construction. This new approach has the objective of minimizing costs by maximizing value &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lauri Koskela in 2000 defined what is called &amp;quot;New Paradigm&amp;quot;. Production had to be conceptualized into three complementary elements: Transformation (T), Flow (F), and Value generation (V). He has brought also the traditional project management community to the inadequacies of the traditional project costruction model. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the previous years, the vision of project management was more focused on reducing costs rather than on the value given to the consumer and satisfying his requests. Thus, the contraposition with the Lean Thinking theory was born. If we consider Lean Thinking in fact, this sees a production process that delivers the product directly into the hands of the consumer, avoiding keeping inventories. The basic idea is the Kaizen (´continuos improvement&#039;) born in the 40s in the Japanese industry along with the theory of continuous flow and elimination of everything that does not constitute added value for the customer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;London challenge in Olympic games 2012&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A striking example of how well has been applied Project Management in the field of construction, and more specifically Program management, is the case of the 2012 London Olympics. The main objective of the program was to plan and build a series of infrastructures during the 7 years after the nomination of London as the host city of the Olympic games 2012 with a budget of £ 7 billion. In fact, it has been possible in this case to satisfy the government, the mass media, the residents of the surrounding areas and the public requirements at the same time. Therefore, the value delivered through the program, was not only the value obtained by stakeholders thanks to the physical construction of the buildings in which the Olympic games and the surrounding infratridges would have been sustained, but also other types of value starting from the reclamation and reconstruction of one of the poorest and most underdeveloped areas of London: the east zone; to be noticed the perfect combination between social, economical and environmental benefits. The main purpose of a program, in fact, is to have a wider vision of the surrounding environment, to help society and to interact closely with ethics and economy in this case of the city of London and its surroundings. The ODA ( Olympic Delivery Authority) has defined, as it is possible to see in Figure 3 (down pointing arrows), six main themes according to how it structured all its activities, defining the strategic goals and the specific objectives to be respected in order to be able to complete the program in the best possible way. The chosen strategy has therefore been perfectly integrated with the application of the Program Management and certainly this, together with the approach adopted with the stakeholders, and the satisfaction of their requirements and their ´desired value´, has allowed to reach perfectly final results. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=68870</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=68870"/>
		<updated>2019-03-01T09:08:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Scheduling:_Critical_path,_PERT_and_Gantt&amp;diff=67081</id>
		<title>Talk:Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Scheduling:_Critical_path,_PERT_and_Gantt&amp;diff=67081"/>
		<updated>2019-02-25T22:39:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract:==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Language&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose explanation&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Title of the Wiki&#039;&#039;&#039;|| OK but could mention something about a comparison or the fact that the article is made to help choosing the right method&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Relevant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Other&#039;&#039;&#039;|| You need a headline for the abstract and the &amp;quot;content box&amp;quot; is before the abstract and the abstract is a bit long. This topic very broad. If you go for it then focus on which method to choose depending on the project and the comparison of the methods since this it what is useful for the reader. So focus on your part 2 and keep 3,4,5 to a minimum. Otherwise it might be better to focus your article so it is not too broad. Let me know if it does not make sense.  &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Federica Menti&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Yes&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Yes, the argument is clear and also the structure of the article&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;improvements suggested:&lt;br /&gt;
Abstract: typing error &amp;quot;aforementioned&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not possible to answer to the question below. &lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Madalina Grigoras&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Well done.&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to be consistent and coherent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
Good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not possible to answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not possible to answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not possible to answer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
It is not possible to answer.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Getting_Things_Done_in_Project_Management:_The_Five_Phases_of_Project_Planning&amp;diff=67079</id>
		<title>Talk:Getting Things Done in Project Management: The Five Phases of Project Planning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Getting_Things_Done_in_Project_Management:_The_Five_Phases_of_Project_Planning&amp;diff=67079"/>
		<updated>2019-02-25T22:32:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract:==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Language&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose explanation&#039;&#039;&#039;|| It is not related to project, program or portfolio management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Title of the Wiki&#039;&#039;&#039;|| A new title could be relevant if you adapt the article to project, program or portfolio management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| How does it relate to project, program or portfolio management? Try to make it related to project management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Francisco Almirudis&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Madalina Grigoras&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Yes,but I would improve it with more and deeper details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
There are no contradictions, it is consistent and it has a logical flow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
It is well written except for some little ortographic errors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
I would add at least one or two imagines in order to have a richer article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
Go deeper in the concepts (ex. conclusions) and show in a better way why it is related to project,program,portfolio management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
It is well done, and very interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
I would find and add more sources in order to improve the topic. I would put together &#039;references and bibliography&#039; when quoting.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Getting_Things_Done_in_Project_Management:_The_Five_Phases_of_Project_Planning&amp;diff=67078</id>
		<title>Talk:Getting Things Done in Project Management: The Five Phases of Project Planning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Talk:Getting_Things_Done_in_Project_Management:_The_Five_Phases_of_Project_Planning&amp;diff=67078"/>
		<updated>2019-02-25T22:30:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Feedback on Abstract:==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Text clarity&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Language&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Description of the tool/theory/concept&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Good &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Purpose explanation&#039;&#039;&#039;|| It is not related to project, program or portfolio management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Title of the Wiki&#039;&#039;&#039;|| A new title could be relevant if you adapt the article to project, program or portfolio management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Relevance to curriculum&#039;&#039;&#039;|| How does it relate to project, program or portfolio management? Try to make it related to project management&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;References&#039;&#039;&#039;|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Francisco Almirudis&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Answer here&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: &#039;&#039;Madalina Grigoras&#039;&#039;==&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 1 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Quality of the summary:&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Yes,but I would improve it with more and deeper details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 2 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Structure and logic of the article:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the argument clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a logical flow to the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does one part build upon the other? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 2===&lt;br /&gt;
There are no contradictions, it is consistent and it has a logical flow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 3 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Grammar and style:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 3===&lt;br /&gt;
It is well written except for some little ortographic errors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 4 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Figures and tables:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are figures and tables clear? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 4===&lt;br /&gt;
I would add at least one or two imagines in order to have a richer article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 5 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Interest and relevance:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 5===&lt;br /&gt;
Go deeper in the concepts (ex. conclusions) and show in a better way why it is related to project,program,portfolio management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 6 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Depth of treatment:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 6===&lt;br /&gt;
It is well done, and very interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Question 7 · TEXT===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Annotated bibliography:&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would you suggest to improve?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Answer 7===&lt;br /&gt;
I would find and add more sources in order to improve the topic.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=66169</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=66169"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T09:16:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: /* Agile approach */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Final users in Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four main pillars: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile approach introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus, avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involves changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=66168</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=66168"/>
		<updated>2019-02-24T09:10:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: /* Company´s strategy, project management and value */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued, or simply it is identified with the company mission, there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address, and what is its  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company&#039;s projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency, and, thus,to enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65744</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65744"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T22:14:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:R.jpg|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Steps of delivering business value  ]] (To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
(To be finished)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:R.jpg&amp;diff=65732</id>
		<title>File:R.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:R.jpg&amp;diff=65732"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T22:08:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: S186465 uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:R.jpg&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65728</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65728"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T22:06:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:K.png|&#039;&#039;&#039;thumb&#039;&#039;&#039;|Key Activities in Portfolio Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:K.png&amp;diff=65698</id>
		<title>File:K.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=File:K.png&amp;diff=65698"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T21:53:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: S186465 uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:K.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65692</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65692"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T21:49:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; , but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;6&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Phillipy, M. A. (2014). Delivering business value: The most important aspect of project management. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2014—North America, Phoenix, AZ. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;3&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Michael E. Porter Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York, 1985 &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;5&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;Top 10 Project Management Trends for 2012 J. LeRoy Ward, PMP, PgMP, Executive Vice President, Product Strategy &amp;amp; Management, ESI International)&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;4&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;James, V. M. (2012). Achieve project success by delivering business value. Paper presented at PMI® Global Congress 2012—North America, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. &#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography and sources description==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65595</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65595"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T21:16:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ” (6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” (5)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. (2) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 2 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65586</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65586"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T21:13:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ” (6)&lt;br /&gt;
In the graph in figure 1 we can see which are the steps that a project manager has to follow in order to understand if what he is actually doing has and creates business value. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” (5)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
The main idea of Value Management is the maximization of value that is generated by the realization of project and program´s benefits. &lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. (2) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 1 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value in construction and IT projects==&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65562</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65562"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:57:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” (5)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. (2) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 1 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Agile approach==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before starting a project it is important to involve consumers in order to understand what are their requests and expectations and how these can be transformed into business value by the project team. In this sense, thanks to Agile Approach, users become an integral part of the project as the unique soul of the organizational body and they are not treated only as external actors. The life of the project revolves around them. Their importance can be noticed even more in the  &amp;quot;Agile Manifesto&amp;quot; which bases its philosophy on four factors: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Attention should be more focused on individuals and interactions than on processes and tools; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Working on the software is more important than complete documentation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Collaboration with the client is more vital than contract negotiation &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4)The process should respond to change rather than being tied to a plan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agile method introduces a method of Project Management that allows the realization of a project by phases, called &amp;quot;sprint&amp;quot;, each of them focused on new functions. It is usually shown to customers the work which is done continuously in order to verify their satisfaction. It is therefore possible to make changes very quickly, thus avoiding the failure of a project already completed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The adoption of the Agile method involved changes in the organizational structure of the teams, in the planning of work and in the culture of companies. Agile in fact allows to achieve reactivity, costs and fixed times, with the aim of giving value to the entire business and to the customers themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65488</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=65488"/>
		<updated>2019-02-22T20:28:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Organizations which use correctly Project, Program, Portfolio management try to achieve a lot of objectives, but the most important one remains providing business value to their customers. (1) But how business value can be defined? The Project Management Istitute tried to summarize it in only one sentence considering a lot of other definitions together: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
´´&#039;&#039;business value is the net benefit that will be realized by the customer of a project, and can be measured in either monetary or non-monetary terms&#039;&#039; ”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Company´s strategy, project management and value==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main goal of a company is to create a competitive advantage. This advantage arises from the additional value that a company is able to create for its customers with respect to the cost it incurs. In this way, customers will prefer the product of the company to that of competitors. According to Michael Porter, US economist and professor at Harvard Business School, a competitive advantage can be of two types: cost leadership (same product / service, but at lower cost) or differentiation (alternative and / or innovative product). Thanks to the use of the value chain, a model theorized by himself in 1985, it is possible to select and understand the most important business processes and therefore those that contribute to have value for the end customer. Every project or program should be an expression of the organization&#039;s strategy. Due to the fact that the strategy often is confused with the objectives pursued or simply it is identified with the company mission there is the need to underline that a strategy is not what an organization wants to achieve, but what it decides to do in order to achieve it, starting from precise choices on which are the main company´s needs to who it wants to address and what is itd  value proposition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A perfect harmony is needed between the strategies followed by the business units and the company projects. In fact, a project must be an integral part of all the activities that constitute the strategy by which the company aims to achieve its competitive advantage. Communication between the executives and the PMO is fundamental and this is also the only way to ensure perfect consistency and thus enable the company to achieve high successes. Otherwise, the lack of alignment between strategy and project management is one of the most common causes of failure of companies and, for this reason, one of the greatest challenges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Success of a project==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to evaluate the success of a project, indicators such as being on time, respecting the budget and satisfying the scope were used in the past few years, but this idea is changing continuously; in fact, projects that do not respect these characteristics could still bring value to the company. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“&#039;&#039;The new definition of project success is that a project can exceed its time and cost estimates as long as the client determines that it is successful by whatever criteria they use.&#039;&#039;” (5)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The new trend is to focus on different factors that put the end user in a central conception. In this sense we consider: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of satisfaction of the stakeholders and of the final customer. Customer satisfaction has become one of the main objectives for companies; in fact, more often, they ask themselves if the client appreciates the work done and the skills demonstrated, if the project creates the conditions for further future collaborations. Some stakeholders may maintain doubts about the quality of the work done. It is good to intercept these doubts during the project and to understand their motivations before it is too late. For this reason it is advisable to carry out an analysis of the stakeholders and take the consequent actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-The users’ adoption. It happens that the outcome realized by a project is not used after its delivery. There can be a lot of motivations depending, for example, on misunderstandings of customers´ requirements or on not high involvement of users in the project. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The value obtained by the project must be defined before the start of it. Several criteria can be set and therefore the metrics to be used for its evaluation are different. The value of a project can in fact refer to the financial value, the value for the customer, the value for the stakeholders, the value for the shareholders, the employment value, the infrastructure value, the expected contribution to the company business, the environmental value, health, safety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, who is the main responsible for this value?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a lot of different ideas about the answer to this question. With the paper presented at PMI® Global Congress in 2012 James, V. M. has declared that not only the project manager is responsible for reaching an high business value, but also other actors such as the Project Sponsor who makes the decisions and is the main value promoter, the business analyst who will analyze data and quantitatively will try to understand which projects bring value to the organization and which not, and finally, but not for this reason less important, subject matter experts (SMEs) who must be involved throughout the project and not just at the end. (4) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Portfolio Value Management==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Value is an indicator of the effect an entity or offering can deliver. Higher is the value higher is the impact it has on the company’s environment. It can be expressed in different ways depending on the types of goals an organization tries to pursue. For example, a public organization will receive value in reducing the costs and increasing people satisfaction while in case of private organizations the most relevant value is increasing profits.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Metrics can be used in order to evaluate tangible value (Skills uplift,Resource capacity, Market share, Client satisfaction or economic value), but for intangible value (Brand awareness, organization’s reputation Risk exposure, Compliance, and Societal value) the evaluation is more difficult. (2) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In figure 1 can be seen which are the main activities of Portfolio Value Management. The Portfolio Manager must excel in negotiating the expected value, maximizing returns, realizing and reporting value. As regarding negotiation different tools can be used as the Value management framework which allows the definition of a target value for each portfolio´s component. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A key role in this sense is played by the external environment and organizational purposes and strategy which can affect the generation and the kind of value. It must be noted the presence of two feedback loops, the first one which links together the Portfolio expected value obtained after the expected value negotiation and the Portfolio required value given by the strategy’s development, while instead, the latter, which has an higher impact, integrates measurements of performance, achieved value and environmental factors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62410</id>
		<title>Articles Spring Term 2019</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=62410"/>
		<updated>2019-02-19T18:03:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2019 Wiki articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Spring Term 2019 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimitrios&lt;br /&gt;
|Kokkinopoulos&lt;br /&gt;
|s182528&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Due Diligence on Wind Farm Assets]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Evgenia&lt;br /&gt;
|Chatzivasileiou&lt;br /&gt;
|s182299&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Sponsorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Theodoros&lt;br /&gt;
|Seremetakis&lt;br /&gt;
|s183272&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Investment portfolio management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Federica&lt;br /&gt;
|Menti&lt;br /&gt;
|S182994&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Getting Things Done (David Allen)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Panagiotis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vounatsos&lt;br /&gt;
|PanosVoun&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Epistemic vs. Aleatory uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack&lt;br /&gt;
|Frain&lt;br /&gt;
|Fraino12345&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexandros&lt;br /&gt;
|Bellos&lt;br /&gt;
|AlexBellos&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Effective Brainstorming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Edoardo&lt;br /&gt;
|Braccini&lt;br /&gt;
|EdoBraa&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realisation Management (BRM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea&lt;br /&gt;
|Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Shannon &amp;amp; Weaver Model for Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|Srdjan&lt;br /&gt;
|Gluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|srdjangluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Scope Control Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Claudinger&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing projects in a functional organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Ronglian&lt;br /&gt;
|Wei&lt;br /&gt;
|Panda Lian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conceptual levels of competence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Jesper &lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource allocation and crashing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliwia&lt;br /&gt;
|Sonia&lt;br /&gt;
|Lubiarz&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Meeting Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
|Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|Frank Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Bartlomiej&lt;br /&gt;
|Maciej&lt;br /&gt;
|Tyczynski&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome, output, benefit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja&lt;br /&gt;
|Benediktsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja Ben.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Periodic Table of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|Einarsdottir&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Success Factors]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedro&lt;br /&gt;
|Lopes da Cunha&lt;br /&gt;
|PedroLopesCunha&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management: Cost vs. Price]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlidis&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Types of activities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeA&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cognitive Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Johan&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilsøe&lt;br /&gt;
|s154073&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unidentified Risks]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads&lt;br /&gt;
|Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[DMAIC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 11&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|Dittmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational Design and Structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Agile One Page Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Madalina&lt;br /&gt;
|Grigoras&lt;br /&gt;
|s186465&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value to whom?]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|Eberholst Carlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Martineberholstcarlsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Initiation Management in construction]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmine&lt;br /&gt;
|Søgren&lt;br /&gt;
|s145320&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Julie &lt;br /&gt;
|Rostgaard Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s123790&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Use of Business Model Canvas to Kickstart the project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan&lt;br /&gt;
|Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|Dilan Casablanca&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prefabricated houses (industrial process)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Sandro &lt;br /&gt;
|Pina&lt;br /&gt;
|SandroPina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Create a pitch]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristoffer&lt;br /&gt;
|Glahn&lt;br /&gt;
|s133378&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Vision statement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Maria Christina&lt;br /&gt;
|Prokou&lt;br /&gt;
|Mprokou&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Negotiation Skills]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib (Seyed)&lt;br /&gt;
|Bahrami&lt;br /&gt;
|Habib&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Uniqueness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Amani&lt;br /&gt;
|Alabdullah&lt;br /&gt;
|s173307&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas&lt;br /&gt;
|Riposati&lt;br /&gt;
|Ripo&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Basic estimation techniques]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark&lt;br /&gt;
|Christiansen&lt;br /&gt;
|s152736&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stephen Covey&#039;s seven principles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Signe &lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerrum&lt;br /&gt;
|s141886&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Triple Constraint in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|Walther&lt;br /&gt;
|Sebastian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value Canvas in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|van Kooten&lt;br /&gt;
|Keegan&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Planning Poker for Improved Project Delivery]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
|Hagos Zeru&lt;br /&gt;
|Gide&lt;br /&gt;
|Trhas&lt;br /&gt;
|[[BIM as a project management tool on construction companies]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|William&lt;br /&gt;
|Durant &lt;br /&gt;
|Mangum&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Crisis Management when there is a Project Cost Overrun]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Shri Tejas &lt;br /&gt;
|Vedula&lt;br /&gt;
|Tehass 7&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The implementation of KPIs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Gandil Qvortrup&lt;br /&gt;
|CasperGandil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Balanced Scorecard in Portfolio Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronika Zsuzsanna&lt;br /&gt;
|Bankó&lt;br /&gt;
|Veronikabanko&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Determining Measurement Methods in Earned Value Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes&lt;br /&gt;
|Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Mercedes Hachmann&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Design Thinking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 1&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Bjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmusbjerg&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cash flow and milestone payments]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Moritz&lt;br /&gt;
|Gutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|MoritzGutheil&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Dan Pink on Motivation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 5&lt;br /&gt;
|Giorgia&lt;br /&gt;
|Scartozzi&lt;br /&gt;
|GiorgiaS&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource-Constrained Critical Path Method]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 3&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|Kürschner&lt;br /&gt;
|Hannah&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Projects integrating Sustainable Methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Vorting&lt;br /&gt;
|s141018&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Product family master plan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group 10&lt;br /&gt;
|André&lt;br /&gt;
|Condamine&lt;br /&gt;
|S173349&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Belbin&#039;s Team Roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristine&lt;br /&gt;
|Kaulberg&lt;br /&gt;
|Kristbk&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Governance of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number 17&lt;br /&gt;
|Sai Mahesh&lt;br /&gt;
|Nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|Sm nadukuru&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Process Planning and Cost Estimation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav&lt;br /&gt;
|Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|Gustav Josephsen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Potentials of Key Performance Indicators]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke Louise Kjær&lt;br /&gt;
|Knudsen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Milestones in Project Planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Hedin&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsstein Poulsen&lt;br /&gt;
|hedinp&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Isabel&lt;br /&gt;
|Wang&lt;br /&gt;
|isabel.w&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realization Management as a key driver of Project Management Effectiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|Frederik&lt;br /&gt;
|Sørensen&lt;br /&gt;
|FTSN&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hersey and Blanchard&#039;s Situational Leadership]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Simon&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm Hansen&lt;br /&gt;
|Muurholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Performance-based contracting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles&lt;br /&gt;
|Hemmingsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s122801&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Programmification of work]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Alberto&lt;br /&gt;
|Tognon&lt;br /&gt;
|s172420&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management in pharmaceutical industry]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Stefano&lt;br /&gt;
|Di Lenardo&lt;br /&gt;
|s190056&lt;br /&gt;
|[[A conceptual framework of sustainability in project management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Arndt &lt;br /&gt;
|Oschinsky&lt;br /&gt;
|AJO&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Project Charter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Dana Rut&lt;br /&gt;
|Gunnarsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|s180289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Reporting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Anna&lt;br /&gt;
|Shevchenko&lt;br /&gt;
|Anutka&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SAFe]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|Boel&lt;br /&gt;
|Morning&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cost Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|Ole&lt;br /&gt;
|Moe&lt;br /&gt;
|s186359&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Prince2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolaj&lt;br /&gt;
|Petersen&lt;br /&gt;
|s173344&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing habits in a project]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie&lt;br /&gt;
|Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|Sofie Martinussen&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Improve communication with active listening]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Sophia&lt;br /&gt;
|Nielsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s114901&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Adaptive Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza&lt;br /&gt;
|Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|Costanza Sesti&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Systems Theory in Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Mathias&lt;br /&gt;
|Steuch&lt;br /&gt;
|Msteuch&lt;br /&gt;
|[[SMART goals - A Project Manager Tool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Marie&lt;br /&gt;
|Bukkholm&lt;br /&gt;
|s182741&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource breakdown structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|Kindingstad&lt;br /&gt;
|Karina&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits of systems engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert&lt;br /&gt;
|Kjønås&lt;br /&gt;
|RobertK&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Human behaviors in scheduling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|8&lt;br /&gt;
|Bashir &lt;br /&gt;
|Isse&lt;br /&gt;
|BJI&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Decision-making]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Andreas &lt;br /&gt;
|Tuxen&lt;br /&gt;
|S153408&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Requirements management using SysML]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|Helene &lt;br /&gt;
|Gravdal&lt;br /&gt;
|S182610&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Key performance indicator (KPI)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|Rajat &lt;br /&gt;
|Kumar&lt;br /&gt;
|S181289&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk Log]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|Osman Furkan&lt;br /&gt;
|Simsek&lt;br /&gt;
|S182730&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Maslow&#039;s Hierarchy of Needs and Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Søren&lt;br /&gt;
|Bojesen&lt;br /&gt;
|s135284&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Evolutionary purpose as motivational driver in project and programme management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Mohr&lt;br /&gt;
|Madsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s144416&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Application of Agile]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Helena Brandt&lt;br /&gt;
|Rejndrup&lt;br /&gt;
|S145492&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Leadership vs. management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Behzad&lt;br /&gt;
|Sanie&lt;br /&gt;
|S122919&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Four types of dependency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Kevin &lt;br /&gt;
|Lim&lt;br /&gt;
|s123368&lt;br /&gt;
|[[What is SWOT]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Alexander &lt;br /&gt;
|Bagge&lt;br /&gt;
|s123908&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Risk identification methods]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|Mie Cuhre&lt;br /&gt;
|Anker&lt;br /&gt;
|s143895&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Optimism bias, Strategic Misinterpretation and Reference Class Forecasting (RCF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Martin&lt;br /&gt;
|Kirk&lt;br /&gt;
|s162004&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Communication and Media Richness Assurance in High-performance Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11&lt;br /&gt;
|Birita&lt;br /&gt;
|Poulsen&lt;br /&gt;
|s144296&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Designing Organizational Structure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|Simone&lt;br /&gt;
|Bruhn&lt;br /&gt;
|s152998&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gantt chart and Scheduling techniques]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|14&lt;br /&gt;
|Rasmus&lt;br /&gt;
|Vedel&lt;br /&gt;
|S143855&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conflict Resolution in Project Management]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=61484</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=61484"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:59:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: /* Abstract */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined &#039;&#039;end users&#039;&#039;, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=61483</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=61483"/>
		<updated>2019-02-17T17:58:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of a project is to create value balancing risks and rewards &amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;1&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. A Guide to the PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ( PMBOK ® GUIDE ) Sixth Edition&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but value for whom?&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to understand which are the main stakeholders by underlining the importance of customers and of those who are defined end users, presenting also the strategies of communication that should be maintained with all these actors. &lt;br /&gt;
The project benefits management plan, which is an additional document to the project charter and the project management plan, describes how to bring benefits and how to monitor them subsequently. A benefit delivers value, which can be tangible or intangible, to the organization and to people impacted by the project.&lt;br /&gt;
Each organization, thanks to Program Management aims to increase its ability to transfer its benefits to society, consumers and users. Benefits are presented differently depending on whether a non-commercial organization (social value) or a commercial organization (business value) is considered.&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of Portfolio Management there is a section completely dedicated to value management, to the descriptions of its components and the tasks which should be performed by the portfolio manager: from the negotiation of the expected value to final report value.&amp;lt;ref name=&#039;&#039;2&#039;&#039;&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;©2017 Project Management Institute, Inc. The Standard for PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Finally in the article, the Agile approach  will be considered and how this allows users to help increasing the value for themselves and for the company. In this way the needs and desires of the consumer are met in the best possible way; in fact consumers are one of the four fundamental pillars of the Agile manifesto. The big difference between predictive projects and agile projects is that, in the latter case, the value is delivered to consumers throughout the implementation of the agile project, not only at the end as can happen for example applying the Kanban approach (part of Lean Thinking) that focuses solely on the final value brought to the consumer. The value then flows very quickly and optimized to the end user who is the main reason why the project team and the leaders act in one way rather than another.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=60945</id>
		<title>Articles Spring Term 2019</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Articles_Spring_Term_2019&amp;diff=60945"/>
		<updated>2019-02-12T18:27:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: /* Overview of 2019 Wiki articles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+ &#039;&#039;&#039;Disclaimer!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;The requirements for the articles written in previous Terms (2014, 2015, 2016, Jun 2017, 2017) were not the same as for Spring Term 2018 and 2019. Please make sure you read the requirements for your own fall/spring term carefully before starting your wiki article.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please complete this table with your group number, full name, username and the title of your article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To create more lines in the table click &#039;&#039;&#039;Edit&#039;&#039;&#039; and use the following code to create more lines in the table and replace the example text with your own information:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre style=&amp;quot;white-space: pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
white-space: -o-pre-wrap; &lt;br /&gt;
word-wrap: break-word;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number&lt;br /&gt;
|First Name&lt;br /&gt;
|Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
|Username&lt;br /&gt;
|Link to Article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Create a direct link by making square brackets ([[ ]]) around the title such as [[Title]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The straight lines ( | ) create columns and the straight line with a dash ( |- ) creates a new row in the table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
( |} ) is only used at the very end to finish the coding for the table.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Overview of 2019 Wiki articles=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Spring Term 2019 Wiki Articles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Group Number&lt;br /&gt;
!First Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Last Name&lt;br /&gt;
!User Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Link to Article&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Panagiotis&lt;br /&gt;
|Vounatsos&lt;br /&gt;
|PanosVoun&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Epistemic vs. Aleatory uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack&lt;br /&gt;
|Frain&lt;br /&gt;
|Fraino12345&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Stakeholder Management Processes in Projects]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Edoardo&lt;br /&gt;
|Braccini&lt;br /&gt;
|EdoBraa&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Benefits Realisation Management (BRM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea&lt;br /&gt;
|Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andrea Könnecke&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Shannon &amp;amp; Weaver Model for Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Srdjan&lt;br /&gt;
|Gluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|srdjangluhovic&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Scope Control Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|Claudinger&lt;br /&gt;
|Casper&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Managing projects in a functional organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Ronglian&lt;br /&gt;
|Wei&lt;br /&gt;
|Panda Lian&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Conceptual levels of competence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Jesper &lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|Wolters&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Resource allocation and crashing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-		&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Oliwia&lt;br /&gt;
|Sonia&lt;br /&gt;
|Lubiarz&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Meeting Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Francisco&lt;br /&gt;
|Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|Frank Almirudis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Bartlomiej&lt;br /&gt;
|Maciej&lt;br /&gt;
|Tyczynski&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Outcome, output, benefit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja&lt;br /&gt;
|Benediktsdóttir&lt;br /&gt;
|Brynja Ben.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Periodic Table of Project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|Einarsdottir&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonina Thora&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Project Management Success Factors]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
!Pedro&lt;br /&gt;
!Lopes da Cunha&lt;br /&gt;
!PedroLopesCunha&lt;br /&gt;
![[Project Management: Cost vs. Price]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlidis&lt;br /&gt;
|Sarantis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Types of activities]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Rikke&lt;br /&gt;
|Andersen&lt;br /&gt;
|RikkeA&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cognitive Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Johan&lt;br /&gt;
|Hilsøe&lt;br /&gt;
|s154073&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Unidentified Risks]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads&lt;br /&gt;
|Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|Mads Kronholm&lt;br /&gt;
|[[DMAIC]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|Dittmann&lt;br /&gt;
|Anne&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Organisational Design and Structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|Pedersen&lt;br /&gt;
|Thea&lt;br /&gt;
|[[One Page project Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Group Number Pending&lt;br /&gt;
|Madalina&lt;br /&gt;
|Grigoras&lt;br /&gt;
|s186465&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Value to whom?]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=60944</id>
		<title>Value to whom?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://13.50.150.85/index.php?title=Value_to_whom%3F&amp;diff=60944"/>
		<updated>2019-02-12T18:26:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;S186465: Created page with &amp;quot;==Abstract==&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Abstract==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>S186465</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>