View source for Talk:Integrated Concurrent Engineering

==Abstract Feedback==

'''Text clarity'''	Text is coherent

'''Language'''	        Good, although be careful when using "are" and "is" appropriately

'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''	Explain what ICE is. The abstract can be slightly more elaborated

'''Purpose explanation'''	Okay, but what purpose does this article serve in terms of project management? How do you measure "efficiency could increase?" Does efficiency increase as a result of better communication (as in better Project Communications Management)? This needs to clarified in the article

'''References'''	        Missing appropriate references to mandatory list of references

'''Relevance of article'''      Consider the following:

<ol>
  <li> Who is the reader? Project Manager or Sponsor ect?
  <li> Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project management community more than a normal web search
</ol>