View source for Talk:Due Diligence on Wind Farm Assets

==Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: ''Edoardo Braccini''==
===Question 1 · TEXT===
'''Quality of the summary:'''

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? Yes

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 1===
I would put some words in bold, in this way the reading is easier. 

===Question 2 · TEXT===
'''Structure and logic of the article:''' 

Is the argument clear?  Yes

Is there a logical flow to the article? Yes

Does one part build upon the other? Yes

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? Yes

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 2===
I would emphasize the relation between the Due Diligence and the project management.

===Question 3 · TEXT===
'''Grammar and style:''' 

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Mostly

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? Yes

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 3===
It appears to me that there are some repetitions and in one sentence the tenses don't match. 

===Question 4 · TEXT===
'''Figures and tables:''' 

Are figures and tables clear? yes

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? 

What would you suggest to improve? 

===Answer 4===
I would add some more figures

===Question 5 · TEXT===
'''Interest and relevance:''' 

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? yes

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?  yes

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 5===
-
===Question 6 · TEXT===
'''Depth of treatment:''' 

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? Yes

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? Yes

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 6===
I would suggest some tools that can help during the Due Diligence. 
===Question 7 · TEXT===
'''Annotated bibliography:''' 

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Yes

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? No

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? Yes

What would you suggest to improve? 

===Answer 7===
I would add a linked references and I would add the reference of the figure.