View source for Talk:Lean as a project management tool

==Reviewer: Faker, review3==

;Clarity of writing. Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
: There are a lot of both grammatical and spelling error. 
: Unacademic language. pulling "it" and "is" together in "it's" is better suited for speech than academic writing.
: There are not necessarily a lot of fill words, but the text can come across as a bit lenghty. It seems possible to explain the topic in a more concise manner.

;Clarity of the argument: Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
: The order of chapters seem to work well.

;Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
: I feel like the history chapter is irrelevant to the assignment as described in the course handbook.
: I feel like the topic of the article is spread too thin. Some of the tool explanations could be done by just linking to other articles that describe the specific tool in more detail.

;Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
: The article is well cited. Some passages are dominated by authors opinion, but it is not excessive and it does not hurt the point of the article.

;Is the article properly linked within the Wiki to other relevant articles and category summaries?
: There are no links within the Wiki.