View source for Talk:Key Performance Indicators (KPI)

==Abstract Feedback==
Text Clarity; Ok.

Language; Ok.

References; missing references

Can you elaborate more the abstract.Try to relate with an specific aspect of Project Management Standards, the link provided is not a relevant source.

What is the relevance of this topic for Project Managers?

Please check again the point 5, Individual Assignment of the Course handbook and Reference Reading material for the Wiki Assignment and Project Work.


Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Jonas Samuelsen

[edit]Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?



[edit]Answer 1
Very nice and intuitive introduction. 
I dont have any sugestion for changes here

[edit]Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 2
The article is vel structured and easy to follow. I did not find any contradictions.

[edit]Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 3
Well written and easy to understand.

[edit]Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 4
The figure is fine, but I would like to see an original instead of a copy.

[edit]Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 5
The article clearly states why KPI's is important. The article has practical relevance with some in-depth treatment of the topic

[edit]Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 6
The article needs some elaboration. There is a lot of pointers, but with little text. I would like to know when to use which analysis or what each of then is suitable for.

[edit]Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 7
None 

[edit]Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here

[edit]Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 1
Answer here

[edit]Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 2
Answer here

[edit]Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 3
Answer here

[edit]Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 4
Answer here

[edit]Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 5
Answer here

[edit]Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 6
Answer here

[edit]Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit]Answer 7
Answer here

==Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: ''Harald Hersted''==
===Question 1 · TEXT===
'''Quality of the summary:'''

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 1===
''Great summary and lovely intro''

===Question 2 · TEXT===
'''Structure and logic of the article:''' 

Is the argument clear? 

Is there a logical flow to the article? 

Does one part build upon the other? 

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 2===
''remember to start with a BIG letter and just take a quick look at your layout again.
structure is fine''

===Question 3 · TEXT===
'''Grammar and style:''' 

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? 

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 3===
''Fine i am no exspert''

===Question 4 · TEXT===
'''Figures and tables:''' 

Are figures and tables clear? 

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 4===
''I don't know if there is any you could put in ?''

===Question 5 · TEXT===
'''Interest and relevance:''' 

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? 

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 5===
''VERY relevante, i would maybe come with an example of which KPI's they had fore a well known project.''

===Question 6 · TEXT===
'''Depth of treatment:''' 

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? 

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 6===
''Show what others have done, and describe the limitations for KPI's. Tell maybe how they should be presented in a project, it could be on a board in the main room of where the projects is controlled.''

===Question 7 · TEXT===
'''Annotated bibliography:''' 

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? 

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? 

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? 

What would you suggest to improve?

===Answer 7===
''Well your references have not been shown at the bottom, so it is hard to tell''