View source for Talk:Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations


--->Answer to the feedback:
[== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]]


Username : Michaelnguyendtu <br>
Review 1: <br>

Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work!
Formal aspects 
*The article has an overall good academically sound to it, which makes it pleasant to read!
*Short and precise sentences which makes the article easy to read. Grammar in the article is also very neat!
*The structure is at this point good; however sub headlines in the final version would make it easier to navigate.
* For the layout in the chapter: Goals of Portfolio Management, it would maybe be “easier for the eye” to look at by using line break between the numbers 1-5.
*As this is a draft I am sure that the final version would have figures to illustrate some of the point, if not this could be a consideration.
*Annotated bibliography is at this point missing as you have also stated, important also to remember to attach some description to these.
Content 
* The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing.
*The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”?



Group 10: Marazaki Ilektra s142899
Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations







--->Answer to the feedback:
[== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]]

Reviewer 2: s141592

To begin with,in general this article is very clear and every one can understand the purpose of the article without knowing much about Portfolio Management.

Formal aspects:

*This article is free of grammatical errors or spelling errors.
*The most of the sentences are very clear but some of them should be shorter instead of long winded.
*By reading this you can understand the meaning of the article.
*The article is written formal and it follows the wiki standards.

Content aspects:

*I do not think that it is an article is helpful for practitioner because it describes Portfolio Management from a very general view.
*The size of the article is perfect,not too long or too short.Everyone can read it without being board or not understanding.
*Most of the parts are pretty tied together and you can notice the escalation of the parts very clear.
*The summary contains the most of the parts that you will meat in the article.
*The article also provides many sources and several studies and practical cases.
*The article does not contain bibliography.
*I do not think that the article seems to be copy and paste because by reading it you can notice the authors mentality.