Talk:Agile project management - Revision history

S133819 at 07:18, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T07:18:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 19 February 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:
	''Yes there is prOperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography.''		''Yes there is prOperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography.''

	~~Agile project management~~
	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Mint Rasmussen''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Mint Rasmussen''==
	===Question 1 ===		===Question 1 ===

S133819 at 07:05, 19 February 2018

2018-02-19T07:05:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:05, 19 February 2018
Line 97:		Line 97:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''Yes there is prOperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography.''		''Yes there is prOperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography.''

			Agile project management
			==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Mint Rasmussen''==
			===Question 1 ===
			'''Quality of the summary:'''

			Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 1===
			''Good overview of the article. ''
			''Nothing to suggest. ''

			===Question 2 ===
			'''Structure and logic of the article:'''

			Is the argument clear?

			Is there a logical flow to the article?

			Does one part build upon the other?

			Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 2===
			''The explanation of APM is good. ''
			''The article is incoherent. Work on the transition from each parts. ''
			''My suggestion would be to give some examples on practical application of APM. ''

			===Question 3 ===
			'''Grammar and style:'''

			Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

			Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 3===
			''There are some minor grammatical and spelling errors in the article.''

			''My suggestions would be to mark all the keywords with italic style, to give a better overview of which words are keywords. Be careful of the mixup of dots and comma and big and small letters. Another suggestion would be to ask someone to proofread the article, to minimize the minor errors. ''

			===Question 4 ===
			'''Figures and tables:'''

			Are figures and tables clear?

			Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 4===
			''The figure gives a good overview of ‘’the roadmap to value’’ for agile planning. ''
			The explanation of the process is also good.

			''More figures to gives an overview of other subjects. ''

			===Question 5 ===
			'''Interest and relevance:'''

			Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

			Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 5===
			''The article made it clear for someone who doesn’t know what APM is. Furthermore, it gives a good overview of which applications the topic is associated with. ''

			''As I have mentioned before, my suggestion would be to give some examples on practical application of APM. ''

			===Question 6 ===
			'''Depth of treatment:'''

			Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

			Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 6===
			''The article gives a good overview of what APM is. ''
			''My suggestions can be seen above. ''

			===Question 7 ===
			'''Annotated bibliography:'''

			Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

			Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

			Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 7===
			''Good, nothing to suggest.''

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 6 */

2018-02-18T18:44:15Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:44, 18 February 2018
Line 82:		Line 82:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~There~~ is ~~a lot~~ about ~~Risk Management on~~ the ~~internet~~, ~~PMBOOK Project Management Book is a good guide to work in civil engineering project and is to early to think~~ that is ~~significant contribution~~ because the ~~author haven't finished yet''~~		''I believe that there is not enough information about Agile project management, it's the first time that i ear about that term, i believe that is of practical relevance because the method sounds new and are related with IT that nowadays have become in a important topic.

	===Question 7 · ===		===Question 7 · ===

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 5 */

2018-02-18T18:41:32Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 18 February 2018
Line 71:		Line 71:
	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''It has academic relevance nevertheless practical relevance should be reflected more directly in the text "		''It has academic relevance nevertheless practical relevance should be reflected more directly in the text "

	===Question 6 · ===		===Question 6 · ===
	'''Depth of treatment:'''		'''Depth of treatment:'''

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 4 */

2018-02-18T18:41:14Z

Answer 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 18 February 2018
Line 58:		Line 58:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''I think the pictures are place a good and are related with the ~~arcticule~~, however ~~you know~~ that ~~you haven't finish yet and~~ should ~~put~~ more pictures. But good choise of picture, they are easy to understand.''		''I think the pictures are place a good and are related with the article, however i beleive that there is a lack of picture, the author should introduce more pictures, only 1 picture and the article is to dense in terms of concepts, with pictures and drawings will be easier the concepts of the articule. But good choise of picture, they are easy to understand.''

	===Question 5 · ===		===Question 5 · ===

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 3 */

2018-02-18T18:38:39Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 18 February 2018
Line 46:		Line 46:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''No grammar or spelling mistakes i think so. Good language and I ~~can~~ understand the whole idea, however i am not the best to speak in this topic i am spanish native speaker .''		''No grammar or spelling mistakes i think so. Good language and I could understand the whole idea, however i am not the best to speak in this topic i am spanish native speaker .

	===Question 4 · ===		===Question 4 · ===

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 2 */

2018-02-18T18:37:29Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:37, 18 February 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''Nice explanation of the Agile Project Managment. Good flow ~~but I find that there~~ is ~~not relation with construction projects~~ and ~~the subtitles yet~~, . The article has a nice flow.		''Nice explanation of the Agile Project Managment. Good flow is well organized and synteshised, . The article has a nice flow.
	Very nice with links and the biography of the references, ~~but~~ maybe ~~is good idea~~ to ~~speak about~~ the ~~biography and how is related with construction projects with examples, arguments, illustration etc ''~~		Very nice with links and the biography of the references, maybe should be like a small example to illustrate the concept.

	===Question 3 · ===		===Question 3 · ===

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 2 */

2018-02-18T18:26:09Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 18 February 2018
Line 33:		Line 33:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''Nice explanation of the ~~Management Risk~~. Good flow but I find that there is not relation with construction projects and the subtitles yet, . The article has a nice flow.		''Nice explanation of the Agile Project Managment. Good flow but I find that there is not relation with construction projects and the subtitles yet, . The article has a nice flow.
	Very nice with links and the biography of the references, but maybe is good idea to speak about the biography and how is related with construction projects with examples, arguments, illustration etc ''		Very nice with links and the biography of the references, but maybe is good idea to speak about the biography and how is related with construction projects with examples, arguments, illustration etc ''

Daniel Campos: /* Answer 1 */

2018-02-18T18:25:02Z

Answer 1

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 18 February 2018
Line 17:		Line 17:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''Good summary. It is very clear what you are going to tell about ~~Risk management~~, ~~maybe~~ you have ~~to speak more how is~~ related the ~~uncertain effectiveness and uncertain efficiency and the 4 fundamental elements with construction projects~~ ''		''Good summary. It is very clear what you are going to tell about Agile Project Management, you have developed a good argument discussion related with the summary ''

	===Question 2 ===		===Question 2 ===

Daniel Campos at 17:34, 18 February 2018

2018-02-18T17:34:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:34, 18 February 2018
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Daniel Campos Rivera''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Daniel Campos Rivera''==
	===Question 1 · ~~TEXT~~===		===Question 1 · ===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''