Talk:Analytic Hierarchy Process - Revision history

Onysz: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz */

2018-02-20T00:26:16Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 20 February 2018
Line 146:		Line 146:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''Figures and tables properly summarize the key points of the article and by providing the reader with these visualizations ~~- make~~ it even more transparent.''		''Figures and tables properly summarize the key points of the article and by providing the reader with these visualizations it makes it even more transparent.''

	''I would just suggest to provide each figure/table with a number and adequate reference (what is it inspired by) and enlarge two of them: the one under "Define the Problem Hierarchy" and "The Pairwise Comparison".''		''I would just suggest to provide each figure/table with a number and adequate reference (what is it inspired by) and enlarge two of them: the one under "Define the Problem Hierarchy" and "The Pairwise Comparison".''

			''I would also consider presenting the criteria from the example (a-g) in a table for even better transparency.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===

Onysz: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz */

2018-02-20T00:16:44Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 20 February 2018
Line 98:		Line 98:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Abstract and Summary are not finished yet, but while doing so please remember to define who is the final (target) reader of the article, which area does it apply to (Project/Program/Portfolio Management) and why is it so relevant there.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===

Onysz: /* Answer 6 */

2018-02-20T00:14:22Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 20 February 2018
Line 173:		Line 173:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''The article is undoubtedly very interesting for both practitioner and academic to read. It makes a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search by providing explanation of why is AHP so important and a clear guidance of how to follow the process supported with a transparent example.		''The article is undoubtedly very interesting for both practitioner and academic to read. It makes a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search by providing explanation of why is AHP so important and a clear guidance of how to follow the process supported with a transparent example.''
	I would just suggest one more thing. Once you define who is the final reader of the article and which scope does it cover (Project/Program/Portfolio Management) also try to narrow it down a bit more by discussing whether usage of the process is the same within different Project/Program/Portfolio levels of complexity.''		''I would just suggest one more thing. Once you define who is the final reader of the article and which scope does it cover (Project/Program/Portfolio Management) also try to narrow it down a bit more by discussing whether usage of the process is the same within different Project/Program/Portfolio levels of complexity.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Onysz: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz */

2018-02-20T00:14:05Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 20 February 2018
Line 173:		Line 173:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is undoubtedly very interesting for both practitioner and academic to read. It makes a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search by providing explanation of why is AHP so important and a clear guidance of how to follow the process supported with a transparent example.
			I would just suggest one more thing. Once you define who is the final reader of the article and which scope does it cover (Project/Program/Portfolio Management) also try to narrow it down a bit more by discussing whether usage of the process is the same within different Project/Program/Portfolio levels of complexity.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

Onysz: /* Answer 7 */

2018-02-20T00:07:49Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 20 February 2018
Line 187:		Line 187:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''The article refers to various scientific positions. "References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology could be shortly explained to the reader on side.''		''The article refers to various scientific positions. "References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology could be shortly explained to the reader on side. Remember to include at least one position recommended from the course (PMBOOK, "Systematic Problem Analysis").''

Onysz: /* Answer 7 */

2018-02-20T00:05:46Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 20 February 2018
Line 187:		Line 187:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''"References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology could be shortly explained to the reader on side.''		''The article refers to various scientific positions. "References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology could be shortly explained to the reader on side.''

Onysz: /* Answer 7 */

2018-02-20T00:05:06Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 20 February 2018
Line 187:		Line 187:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''"References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology ~~needs to~~ be shortly explained to the reader on side.''		''"References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology could be shortly explained to the reader on side.''

Onysz: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz */

2018-02-20T00:04:39Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 20 February 2018
Line 187:		Line 187:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''"References" and "Annotated bibliography" (short description of the importance and usefulness of the scientific positions you are referring to) would need to be included. I would also consider including "Glossary" if you think some terminology needs to be shortly explained to the reader on side.''

Onysz: /* Answer 5 */

2018-02-20T00:00:44Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 20 February 2018
Line 160:		Line 160:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''The article and the topic itself are both of high practical and academic relevance. It is clearly explained in the article that AHP is very powerful process as it is highly relevant to support the decision-making process.		''The article and the topic itself are both of high practical and academic relevance. It is clearly explained in the article that AHP is very powerful process as it is highly relevant to support the decision-making process.''
	I would just include the relevance of AHP in Project/Portfolio/Program Management and who is intended to be the final reader of the article - who could benefit the most in applying this process into practice (a steering committee? a project manager?)''		''I would just include the relevance of AHP in Project/Portfolio/Program Management and who is intended to be the final reader of the article - who could benefit the most in applying this process into practice (a steering committee? a project manager?)''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===

Onysz: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz */

2018-02-20T00:00:25Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Klaudia Edyta Onyszkiewicz

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 20 February 2018
Line 160:		Line 160:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article and the topic itself are both of high practical and academic relevance. It is clearly explained in the article that AHP is very powerful process as it is highly relevant to support the decision-making process.
			I would just include the relevance of AHP in Project/Portfolio/Program Management and who is intended to be the final reader of the article - who could benefit the most in applying this process into practice (a steering committee? a project manager?)''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===