Talk:Construction modularization from a lean perspective - Revision history

S143352 at 17:11, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T17:11:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 27 September 2015
Line 44:		Line 44:

	* BSB term should be explained before used in the ABSTRACT PARAGRAPH		* BSB term should be explained before used in the ABSTRACT PARAGRAPH
			**'''Answer:''' It is, under T30 section. Broad Sustainable Buildings Co. Ltd (BSB)
	* I would suggest in general to create less complex and smaller sentences throughout the article in order to avoid confusion for the reader		* I would suggest in general to create less complex and smaller sentences throughout the article in order to avoid confusion for the reader
	* Under Board Sustainable Building Co.Ltd paragraph there is a space mistake “ The2008..” and use past tense as well.		* Under Board Sustainable Building Co.Ltd paragraph there is a space mistake “ The2008..” and use past tense as well.
			**'''Answer:''' Adopted and amended thanks
	* Also the numbering can become simpler not 1…..1….2….1 but instead.1……1.1….2…….2.1		* Also the numbering can become simpler not 1…..1….2….1 but instead.1……1.1….2…….2.1
			**'''Answer:''' Adopted and amended thanks
	* Reference at the end of TH30 HOTEL, Modular Constructions impact on critical path, paragraph is missing?		* Reference at the end of TH30 HOTEL, Modular Constructions impact on critical path, paragraph is missing?
			**'''Answer:''' Adopted and amended thanks
	* In the paragraphs under BSB's prefabrication technology reference is missing		* In the paragraphs under BSB's prefabrication technology reference is missing
	* In lean Construction paragraph double “. . “ error and gap after “.” Exist also in the second paragraph. Also reference is missing.		* In lean Construction paragraph double “. . “ error and gap after “.” Exist also in the second paragraph. Also reference is missing.

S143352 at 17:04, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T17:04:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 27 September 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.		*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.
	*There is no section “annotated bibliography”.		*There is no section “annotated bibliography”.
	**'''Answer:''' Done, was not finished at the time.		**'''Answer:''' Done, annotated bibliography was not finished at the time.
	*As far as I noticed, there were no link to other APPPM wiki article. But links to websites, that is fine.		*As far as I noticed, there were no link to other APPPM wiki article. But links to websites, that is fine.
	*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”		*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”

S143352 at 17:04, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T17:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 27 September 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*No figures therefore no copyright issue		*No figures therefore no copyright issue
	*I think the overall wiki formation of the article is fine.		*I think the overall wiki formation of the article is fine.
	**'''Answer:''' Videos and pictures is implemented.		**'''Answer:''' Videos and pictures is implemented, was not finished at the time. .
	Content aspects:		Content aspects:

S143352 at 17:03, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T17:03:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 27 September 2015
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.		*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.
	*The starting summary is good and works fine, but I think the “preface” and “abstact” could be merged together and be more precise in terms of starting the “red thread”.		*The starting summary is good and works fine, but I think the “preface” and “abstact” could be merged together and be more precise in terms of starting the “red thread”.
			**'''Answer:''' adopted and amended thanks
	*The reference is missing.		*The reference is missing.
	*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.		*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.

S143352 at 17:01, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T17:01:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 27 September 2015
Line 14:		Line 14:
	*No figures therefore no copyright issue		*No figures therefore no copyright issue
	*I think the overall wiki formation of the article is fine.		*I think the overall wiki formation of the article is fine.
			**'''Answer:''' Videos and pictures is implemented.
	Content aspects:		Content aspects:

Line 26:		Line 26:
	*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.		*I find it hard to say which material has been used. There should be a clear list of reference and link into the text.
	*There is no section “annotated bibliography”.		*There is no section “annotated bibliography”.
			**'''Answer:''' Done, was not finished at the time.
	*As far as I noticed, there were no link to other APPPM wiki article. But links to websites, that is fine.		*As far as I noticed, there were no link to other APPPM wiki article. But links to websites, that is fine.
	*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”		*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”
			**'''Answer:''' Thanks wrong text headline, it comes further down now.
	*There is no reason to think there is any type of plagiarism		*There is no reason to think there is any type of plagiarism

S143352 at 16:54, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T16:54:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 27 September 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant.		*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant.
	*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.		*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.
	'''**Answer:''' The PPPM relation is lean Construction management.		**'''Answer:''' The PPPM relation is lean Construction management.
	*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.		*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.
	*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.		*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.

S143352 at 16:54, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T16:54:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:54, 27 September 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant.		*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant.
	*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.		*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.
	** The PPPM relation is lean Construction.		'''**Answer:''' The PPPM relation is lean Construction management.
	*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.		*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.
	*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.		*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.

S143352 at 16:50, 27 September 2015

2015-09-27T16:50:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:50, 27 September 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Content aspects:		Content aspects:

	*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant .		*For practitioners it is a relevant article, because the topic is very relevant.
	*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.		*It is not specific related to PPPM. However, the idea lean and critical path is used in project management and scheduling.
			** The PPPM relation is lean Construction.
	*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.		*The length of the article is fine. I don’t think it should be longer, but maybe a bit more in the “Preface” and maybe it is too basic.
	*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.		*I think the overall red thread is fine and the article seems coherent.
Line 28:		Line 29:
	*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”		*Own opinion is clearly stated in “ reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector”
	*There is no reason to think there is any type of plagiarism		*There is no reason to think there is any type of plagiarism

S142899 at 21:11, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T21:11:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 22 September 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:
	[[		[[
	(S142899_I am not aware of whether I am reviewer ½ or 3)		(S142899_I am not aware of whether I am reviewer ½ or 3)

	References are missing summary at the end.		References are missing summary at the end.

	A) Not many grammatical or spelling mistakes!		A) Not many grammatical or spelling mistakes!
	1. BSB term should be explained before used in the ABSTRACT PARAGRAPH
	2.I would suggest in general to create less complex and smaller sentences throughout the article in order to avoid confusion for the reader		* BSB term should be explained before used in the ABSTRACT PARAGRAPH
	3. Under Board Sustainable Building Co.Ltd paragraph there is a space mistake “ The2008..” and use past tense as well.		* I would suggest in general to create less complex and smaller sentences throughout the article in order to avoid confusion for the reader
	4.Also the numbering can become simpler not 1…..1….2….1 but instead.1……1.1….2…….2.1		* Under Board Sustainable Building Co.Ltd paragraph there is a space mistake “ The2008..” and use past tense as well.
	5. Reference at the end of TH30 HOTEL, Modular Constructions impact on critical path, paragraph is missing?		* Also the numbering can become simpler not 1…..1….2….1 but instead.1……1.1….2…….2.1
	~~6 .~~ In the paragraphs under BSB's prefabrication technology reference is missing		* Reference at the end of TH30 HOTEL, Modular Constructions impact on critical path, paragraph is missing?
	7. In lean Construction paragraph double “. . “ error and gap after “.” Exist also in the second paragraph. Also reference is missing.		* In the paragraphs under BSB's prefabrication technology reference is missing
	8. Under BCB projects analyzed from a lean perspective paragraph data is rmentioned without reference.		* In lean Construction paragraph double “. . “ error and gap after “.” Exist also in the second paragraph. Also reference is missing.
	9. “Broad Organization” in paragraph Reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector could be with small letters		* Under BCB projects analyzed from a lean perspective paragraph data is rmentioned without reference.
			* “Broad Organization” in paragraph Reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector could be with small letters

	B)		B)
	1.Preface and Abstract probably should be in one paragraph		*Preface and Abstract probably should be in one paragraph
	2.Logical paragraph flow without overlapping.		*Logical paragraph flow without overlapping.
	3.I would create a paragraph that incorporates the paragraphs: 3 Broad Group,4 Broad Sustainable Building Co. Ltd., 5 T30 Hotel		*I would create a paragraph that incorporates the paragraphs: 3 Broad Group,4 Broad Sustainable Building Co. Ltd., 5 T30 Hotel
	and name it “case T30 description”		and name it “case T30 description”

	C)		C)
	1.Congrats on summing up info and referring on them in Board Group paragraph.		*Congrats on summing up info and referring on them in Board Group paragraph.
	Especially the summing up paragraph illustrates a critical support of the theory in combination of this case study.		Especially the summing up paragraph illustrates a critical support of the theory in combination of this case study.
	2. I would add the “T30 HOTEL CASE STUDY” in the title of the article probably]]		*I would add the “T30 HOTEL CASE STUDY” in the title of the article probably]]

S142899 at 21:02, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T21:02:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:02, 22 September 2015
Line 31:		Line 31:

	----		----
			[[
			(S142899_I am not aware of whether I am reviewer ½ or 3)
			References are missing summary at the end.
			A) Not many grammatical or spelling mistakes!
			1. BSB term should be explained before used in the ABSTRACT PARAGRAPH
			2.I would suggest in general to create less complex and smaller sentences throughout the article in order to avoid confusion for the reader
			3. Under Board Sustainable Building Co.Ltd paragraph there is a space mistake “ The2008..” and use past tense as well.
			4.Also the numbering can become simpler not 1…..1….2….1 but instead.1……1.1….2…….2.1
			5. Reference at the end of TH30 HOTEL, Modular Constructions impact on critical path, paragraph is missing?
			6 . In the paragraphs under BSB's prefabrication technology reference is missing
			7. In lean Construction paragraph double “. . “ error and gap after “.” Exist also in the second paragraph. Also reference is missing.
			8. Under BCB projects analyzed from a lean perspective paragraph data is rmentioned without reference.
			9. “Broad Organization” in paragraph Reflections on practice of modularization in the construction sector could be with small letters
			B)
			1.Preface and Abstract probably should be in one paragraph
			2.Logical paragraph flow without overlapping.
			3.I would create a paragraph that incorporates the paragraphs: 3 Broad Group,4 Broad Sustainable Building Co. Ltd., 5 T30 Hotel
			and name it “case T30 description”
			C)
			1.Congrats on summing up info and referring on them in Board Group paragraph.
			Especially the summing up paragraph illustrates a critical support of the theory in combination of this case study.
			2. I would add the “T30 HOTEL CASE STUDY” in the title of the article probably]]