Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry - Revision history

Adam.pekala: /* Content */

2015-09-27T21:10:15Z

Content

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 27 September 2015
Line 35:		Line 35:
	<pre style="color: red">I've added a section in general information, point 1.4 where I present some software and link to their pages. I decided not to put it in further readings		<pre style="color: red">I've added a section in general information, point 1.4 where I present some software and link to their pages. I decided not to put it in further readings
	because to my mind they hardly fit there. I'd love to cover topic about the software thoroughly, but since this article treats about the method itself, it was hard to describe		because to my mind they hardly fit there. I'd love to cover topic about the software thoroughly, but since this article treats about the method itself, it was hard to describe
	the software more than quick overview</pre>		the software more than by giving it a quick overview</pre>
	*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods		*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
	<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.		<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.

Adam.pekala: /* Content */

2015-09-27T21:08:44Z

Content

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 27 September 2015
Line 33:		Line 33:
	<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>		<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>
	*Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned		*Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
			<pre style="color: red">I've added a section in general information, point 1.4 where I present some software and link to their pages. I decided not to put it in further readings
			because to my mind they hardly fit there. I'd love to cover topic about the software thoroughly, but since this article treats about the method itself, it was hard to describe
			the software more than quick overview</pre>
	*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods		*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
	<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.		<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.

Adam.pekala: /* alex161 (reviewer 1) */

2015-09-27T19:58:20Z

alex161 (reviewer 1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 27 September 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:
	*Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography		*Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography
	<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>		<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>
	*Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points .		*Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points.
			<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.
			</pre>

Adam.pekala: /* Content */

2015-09-27T19:57:35Z

Content

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 27 September 2015
Line 35:		Line 35:

	*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods		*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
	<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed. In some aspects of the limitation (duration estimations) comparison to PERT was addded as well as link to its wiki page</pre>		<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed.
			In some aspects of the limitation (duration estimations) comparison to PERT was addded as well as link to its wiki page</pre>

	*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT		*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT

Adam.pekala: /* Content */

2015-09-27T19:57:15Z

Content

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 27 September 2015
Line 35:		Line 35:

	*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods		*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
			<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed. In some aspects of the limitation (duration estimations) comparison to PERT was addded as well as link to its wiki page</pre>

	*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT		*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT

Adam.pekala: /* Feedback from s150821 (reviewer 3) */

2015-09-27T19:56:14Z

Feedback from s150821 (reviewer 3)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 27 September 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<pre style="color: red">References are now described and a follow-up material has been provided</pre>		<pre style="color: red">References are now described and a follow-up material has been provided</pre>
	*The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.		*The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.
			<pre style="color: red">Advantages and use limitations section has been rewrited and converted to bullet points. Moreover, use limitations has been extended as deeper analysis of materials has been performed</pre>

	==(Review 2, S145166)==		==(Review 2, S145166)==

Adam.pekala: /* alex161 (reviewer 1) */

2015-09-27T18:04:19Z

alex161 (reviewer 1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:04, 27 September 2015
Line 41:		Line 41:
	In general I like the topic and I read it nicely, the structure seems good . Something is missing around the article but I think you are on a good way. Good job!		In general I like the topic and I read it nicely, the structure seems good . Something is missing around the article but I think you are on a good way. Good job!
	Structure		Structure
	*Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it .		*Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it.
			<pre style="color: red">Thank you, I really appreciate it.</pre>
	*The figure are appropried with the topics		*The figure are appropried with the topics
	<pre style="color: red">Thank you. Looks like working on them additional hours was worth it</pre>		<pre style="color: red">Thank you. Looks like working on them additional hours was worth it</pre>

Adam.pekala: /* alex161 (reviewer 1) */

2015-09-27T18:03:48Z

alex161 (reviewer 1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 27 September 2015
Line 43:		Line 43:
	*Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it .		*Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it .
	*The figure are appropried with the topics		*The figure are appropried with the topics
	*Remember to add the sources to the figures .		<pre style="color: red">Thank you. Looks like working on them additional hours was worth it</pre>
			*Remember to add the sources to the figures.
			<pre style="color: red">Since I have prepared all of the figures myself I cannot reference to any source. I will, however, add source where I based my graphics on source figures.</pre>

	Contents		Contents

Adam.pekala: /* alex161 (reviewer 1) */

2015-09-27T18:01:17Z

alex161 (reviewer 1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 27 September 2015
Line 47:		Line 47:
	Contents		Contents
	*I think that the short history part is a good way to start , it is very concise and understandable		*I think that the short history part is a good way to start , it is very concise and understandable
			<pre style="color: red">Thank you. To read more about history and read about first feedback from construction industry check out the first reference - it is a really good article.</pre>
	*Try to explain bettter the example of CPM graph creation		*Try to explain bettter the example of CPM graph creation
	*The flow of the article is linear and logical without any problem to understand the topics .		<pre style="color: red">I have added some additional description to points 2.2.1-2.2.4. I hope that now all of the calculations as well as final creation of the graph will be clear.</pre>
	*Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography		*The flow of the article is linear and logical without any problem to understand the topics.
			<pre style="color: red">Thank you very much - I am really glad that the article is easy to read</pre>
			*Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography
			<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>
	*Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points .		*Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points .

Adam.pekala: /* Content */

2015-09-27T16:21:38Z

Content

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 27 September 2015
Line 32:		Line 32:
	<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>		<pre style="color: red">Annotated bibliography with references and follow-up section added</pre>
	*Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned		*Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
	~~<pre style="color: red">'''Add comment here'''</pre>~~
	*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods		*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
	~~<pre style="color: red">'''Add comment here'''</pre>~~
	*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT		*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT
	<pre style="color: red">I re-linked some of the links to DTU MAN Wiki pages. Great idea!</pre>		<pre style="color: red">I re-linked some of the links to DTU MAN Wiki pages. Great idea!</pre>