Talk:Gantt chart and Scheduling techniques - Revision history

Muurholm: /* Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here */

2019-02-25T19:54:56Z

Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Place your name here

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 25 February 2019
Line 92:		Line 92:
	''Good referencing, but remember to describe the sources.''		''Good referencing, but remember to describe the sources.''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Simon Muurholm Hansen''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 101:		Line 101:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The abstract sums up the content of the article in a good way''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 117:		Line 117:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The argumentation of the article is solid and the overall readability of the article is good.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 129:		Line 129:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The grammar of the article is good overall with a few minor mistakes such as the present tense verbs in third person.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 141:		Line 141:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The figures are quite good and very illustrative. The video is a nice touch.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 153:		Line 153:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is highly relevant both academicly and practically is it shows the use of a very usefull scheduling tool.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 165:		Line 165:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Same answer as question 5''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 179:		Line 179:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Annotated bibliography is still missing. Otherwise overall good citations.''

Sofie Martinussen at 16:25, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T16:25:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 25 February 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019).		There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019).

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Place your name here~~''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sofie Martinussen''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''
Line 12:		Line 12:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I think the abstact is good and creal but I would suggest to include all the tool mentioned in the article in the abstract, in order for the reader to know what is coming.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 28:		Line 28:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The structure is generally good, i like the fact that the tools are presented in a logical way - e.g. first do this and then this. However, I will suggest to move up the section about scheduling so it comes before project time management, as you mention a few things that come before project time management. ''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 40:		Line 40:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Overall the writing is good, however, a few grammar mistakes are made - more punctuation would help the reader.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 52:		Line 52:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Very nice figures, I like the visual elements. ''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 64:		Line 64:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Very relevant topic, however, it could be made more clear why it is relevant, e.g. reference to project success.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 76:		Line 76:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Yes, very. ''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 90:		Line 90:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Good referencing, but remember to describe the sources.''

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==

Simone at 10:52, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T10:52:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:52, 25 February 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019).		There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019).

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Sarantis Pavlidis~~''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Place your name here''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Simone at 17:30, 24 February 2019

2019-02-24T17:30:02Z

Show changes

Hani Mike Rae Selim: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019)."

2019-02-19T22:55:57Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019)."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract:==

There's some progress. However, I cannot give much feedback at this point as the abstract is incomplete (19-Feb-2019).