Talk:Lean construction - Revision history

Bdmn at 15:25, 28 November 2014

2014-11-28T15:25:08Z

Bdmn: /* Review - B wiki */

2014-11-28T15:23:06Z

Review - B wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 28 November 2014
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*** Tried do change the word order in this sentence		*** Tried do change the word order in this sentence
	**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”		**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”
	***		*** These examples are changed
	**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”		**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”
	*** Think it's right now		*** Think it's right now

Bdmn: /* Review - B wiki */

2014-11-28T15:05:52Z

Review - B wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 28 November 2014
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*Some grammatical errors, for example:		*Some grammatical errors, for example:
	**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ''are''…”, “they together ''strive''…”, “there ''are'' several…”		**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ''are''…”, “they together ''strive''…”, “there ''are'' several…”
			*** Fixed these examples
	**Word order: “''productivity spent hours''”		**Word order: “''productivity spent hours''”
			*** Tried do change the word order in this sentence
	**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”		**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”
			***
	**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”		**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”
			*** Think it's right now
	*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns		*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns
			** I read through the text and didn't find what you mean.
	*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying		*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying
	*You used very nice illustrations to explain the concept. Also useful summary tables		*You used very nice illustrations to explain the concept. Also useful summary tables
	*References are appropriately used		*References are appropriately used
	*At the end of some sections you put two bullet points without introducing them before. Maybe you still have to work on them		*At the end of some sections you put two bullet points without introducing them before. Maybe you still have to work on them
			** A mistake to still have them in the text, and the last part is added.

	Concept aspects:		Concept aspects:

Bdmn: /* REVIEW by Liclawio */

2014-11-28T15:01:59Z

REVIEW by Liclawio

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 28 November 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter		* Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter
	* Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.		* Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.
			** Updated with last part.
	* Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.		* Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.
	* In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables		* In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables
	** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US		** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US
			*** Changed the words i found to US. Also used Word to correct some grammar and spelling.
	** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).		** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).
			*** Thank you, as far as I know it's changed.
	* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.		* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.
			** I referred the the figures in the text, and added in what material they are based on.

	== Review - B wiki ==		== Review - B wiki ==

B wiki: /* Review - B wiki */

2014-11-25T17:19:58Z

Review - B wiki

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 25 November 2014
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Formal aspects:		Formal aspects:
	*Some grammatical errors, for example:		*Some grammatical errors, for example:
	**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ~~are…”~~, “they together ~~strive…”~~, “there are several…”		**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ''are''…”, “they together ''strive''…”, “there ''are'' several…”
	**Word order: ~~“productivity~~ spent ~~hours”~~		**Word order: “''productivity spent hours''”
	**Past participles for irregular verbs: ~~“spent”~~, ~~“shown”~~		**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”
	**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ~~recognize”~~		**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”
	*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns		*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns
	*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying		*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying

B wiki: /* Review - B wiki */ new section

2014-11-25T16:55:55Z

Review - B wiki: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:55, 25 November 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).		** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).
	* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.		* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.

			== Review - B wiki ==

			Formal aspects:
			*Some grammatical errors, for example:
			**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations are…”, “they together strive…”, “there are several…”
			**Word order: “productivity spent hours”
			**Past participles for irregular verbs: “spent”, “shown”
			**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not recognize”
			*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns
			*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying
			*You used very nice illustrations to explain the concept. Also useful summary tables
			*References are appropriately used
			*At the end of some sections you put two bullet points without introducing them before. Maybe you still have to work on them

			Concept aspects:
			*The abstract, in general, is good. You get into the topic quite fast and this is nice for understanding what is all about.
			*The topic is interesting and is related to the subject
			*Really nice structure of the article
			*The length is appropriate for this kind of topic (aprox. 3000 words)
			*Many references are good to see that the sources are reliable
			*The text doesn’t seem to be copied and pasted. When necessary, you used inverted commas (that’s ok)

Liclawio: /* REVIEW by Liclawio */

2014-11-25T16:05:57Z

REVIEW by Liclawio

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 25 November 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== REVIEW by Liclawio ==		== REVIEW by Liclawio ==

	~~Test~~ setup		* In general, a very nice setup of wikipage. Seems like proper use of the wiki platform.
			* Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter
			* Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.
			* Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.
			* In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables
			** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US
			** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).
			* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.

Liclawio: /* REVIEW by Liclawio */ new section

2014-11-25T15:51:37Z

REVIEW by Liclawio: new section

New page

== REVIEW by Liclawio ==

Test setup

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 28 November 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter		* Very good overview article of the theory on the field, and following the setup more or less to the letter
	* Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.		* Really good length of article, especially considering last parts still missing at current time.
	** Updated with last part.		** ''Updated with last part.''
	* Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.		* Nice structure overview. Concise sentences and paragraphs making it easy to read though the article.
	* In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables		* In general good language. However, you should consider a quick spell check in Word or other software also including grammar check (fx. customer). Also spell check figures and tables
	** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US		** Consider whether the article should be written in UK or US English and/or look through spelling. Both words with ou and only o in text (fx. labour/behaviors). Also remember use of “z” vs “s” when considering UK vs US
	*** Changed the words i found to US. Also used Word to correct some grammar and spelling.		*** ''Changed the words i found to US. Also used Word to correct some grammar and spelling.''
	** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).		** Consider single/plural forms (is/are, with/without “s” on endings).
	*** Thank you, as far as I know it's changed.		*** ''Thank you, as far as I know it's changed.''
	* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.		* Nice figures. Could perhaps be included, explained of referenced a bit more through the text. Also a bit difficult to see, whether own figures/tables or taken from elsewhere, and in that case whether they are copyright protected.
	** I referred the the figures in the text, and added in what material they are based on.		** ''I referred the the figures in the text, and added in what material they are based on.''

	== Review - B wiki ==		== Review - B wiki ==
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*Some grammatical errors, for example:		*Some grammatical errors, for example:
	**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ''are''…”, “they together ''strive''…”, “there ''are'' several…”		**Verbs in singular and plural: “These two interpretations ''are''…”, “they together ''strive''…”, “there ''are'' several…”
	*** Fixed these examples		*** ''Fixed these examples''
	**Word order: “''productivity spent hours''”		**Word order: “''productivity spent hours''”
	*** Tried do change the word order in this sentence		*** ''Tried to change the word order in this sentence''
	**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”		**Past participles for irregular verbs: “''spent''”, “''shown''”
	*** These examples are changed		*** ''These examples are changed'
	**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”		**Not appropriate use of auxiliary verbs: “does not ''recognize''”
	*** Think it's right now		*** Think it's right now
	*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns		*Some repetition can be avoided by using pronouns
	** I read through the text and didn't find what you mean.		** ''I read through the text and didn't find what you mean.''
	*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying		*In general, not too long sentences that help to follow what you are saying
	*You used very nice illustrations to explain the concept. Also useful summary tables		*You used very nice illustrations to explain the concept. Also useful summary tables
	*References are appropriately used		*References are appropriately used
	*At the end of some sections you put two bullet points without introducing them before. Maybe you still have to work on them		*At the end of some sections you put two bullet points without introducing them before. Maybe you still have to work on them
	** A mistake to still have them in the text, and the last part is added.		** ''A mistake to still have them in the text, and the last part is added.''

	Concept aspects:		Concept aspects: