Talk:Management of Project Change - Revision history

AndreasAndersen at 12:50, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:50:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 28 September 2015
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:		Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:

	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':~~Thanks~~ you		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thank you
	*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.		*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.
Line 42:		Line 42:

	* Overall a very nice article. It easy to understand and follow the flow of the article.		* Overall a very nice article. It easy to understand and follow the flow of the article.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks a lot		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thanks a lot
	* You have some nice models and you explain them well. However you might want to change ”Model 2” to ”Model 3” in the section ”The value for money (value and cost) phase).		* You have some nice models and you explain them well. However you might want to change ”Model 2” to ”Model 3” in the section ”The value for money (value and cost) phase).
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks. This now changed.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks. This now changed.

AndreasAndersen at 12:50, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:50:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 28 September 2015
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:		Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:

	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks ~~for the positive feedback~~		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks you
	*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.		*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.

AndreasAndersen at 12:49, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:49:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 28 September 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.		* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.
	* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.		* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thanks for all the ~~positiv comments~~		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thanks for all the positive feedback

	===Improvement areas: ===		===Improvement areas: ===
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:		Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:

	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the ~~positiv comment~~		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the positive feedback
	*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.		*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.

AndreasAndersen at 12:09, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:09:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 28 September 2015
Line 42:		Line 42:

	* Overall a very nice article. It easy to understand and follow the flow of the article.		* Overall a very nice article. It easy to understand and follow the flow of the article.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks a lot
	* You have some nice models and you explain them well. However you might want to change ”Model 2” to ”Model 3” in the section ”The value for money (value and cost) phase).		* You have some nice models and you explain them well. However you might want to change ”Model 2” to ”Model 3” in the section ”The value for money (value and cost) phase).
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks. This now changed.
	* Some places the wording is a bit weird or some words are missing like ”the changes not will result”. It is also called the fourth and fifth where you mention the activities from Model 2. I think these mistakes are a typo but try to read the article again in a day or two and pay attention as it can be disturbing when reading the article.		* Some places the wording is a bit weird or some words are missing like ”the changes not will result”. It is also called the fourth and fifth where you mention the activities from Model 2. I think these mistakes are a typo but try to read the article again in a day or two and pay attention as it can be disturbing when reading the article.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have been reading the article many times now to correct all the grammatical errors.
	* One of the things I feel like is missing from the article is a Limitation section where you discuss some of the limitations regarding the topic.		* One of the things I feel like is missing from the article is a Limitation section where you discuss some of the limitations regarding the topic.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a annotated bibliography section and a limitation section.
	* It seems as something went wrong with the reference list. Maybe take a look at some of the other articles and see how they have used their references. I would also like if you could put in references for the models you use.		* It seems as something went wrong with the reference list. Maybe take a look at some of the other articles and see how they have used their references. I would also like if you could put in references for the models you use.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': The reference list is now completed.
	* I would recommend adding an ”Annotated Bibliography” as it is expected according to the guidelines for the articles.		* I would recommend adding an ”Annotated Bibliography” as it is expected according to the guidelines for the articles.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have created a Annotated Bibliography section.

AndreasAndersen at 12:05, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:05:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 28 September 2015
Line 27:		Line 27:
	==Review 2:==		==Review 2:==
	Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:		Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:

	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the positiv comment		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the positiv comment
	*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.		*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.

AndreasAndersen at 12:04, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:04:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 28 September 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	===Suggestion of improvement:===		===Suggestion of improvement:===
	*The reference list should maintain name of the author, the name of the page the article is collected and sometimes the date it is read. This is so that it is easier to quickly see where the source is from, and if it is legit.		*The reference list should maintain name of the author, the name of the page the article is collected and sometimes the date it is read. This is so that it is easier to quickly see where the source is from, and if it is legit.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': You are right. That´s now fixed		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': You are right. That´s now fixed.
	*The pictures are a little small; the text can be hard to read. So adjusting them up would improve the quality.		*The pictures are a little small; the text can be hard to read. So adjusting them up would improve the quality.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Good idea. I will try to adjust the pictures		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Good idea. I will try to adjust the pictures.
	*I would suggest to make a own section about limitation of the tool, so that there is more discussion and not just explanation of theories.		*I would suggest to make a own section about limitation of the tool, so that there is more discussion and not just explanation of theories.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have created a limitation section		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have created a limitation section.

	==Review 2:==		==Review 2:==

AndreasAndersen at 12:03, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:03:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:03, 28 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~''''''Bold text''''''~~Mette: I like your idea. It seems like you want to look at different theories, model and methods in your article for have to manage project changes, but maybe you should consider to just focus on one or two model/method. This way it is possible to go deeper with the chosen model(s) and to discuss the differens between the use of the models.		Mette: I like your idea. It seems like you want to look at different theories, model and methods in your article for have to manage project changes, but maybe you should consider to just focus on one or two model/method. This way it is possible to go deeper with the chosen model(s) and to discuss the differens between the use of the models.

	==s150799 reviewer nr.1==		==s150799 reviewer nr.1==

AndreasAndersen at 12:01, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T12:01:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 28 September 2015
Line 13:		Line 13:
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have been reading the article many times now to correct all the grammatical errors.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have been reading the article many times now to correct all the grammatical errors.
	*To me the reference list is not easy to understand, but it is most likely not completed.		*To me the reference list is not easy to understand, but it is most likely not completed.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': The reference list is now completed		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': The reference list is now completed.
	*There is no annotated bibliography or description of limitation of this tool before the conclusion.		*There is no annotated bibliography or description of limitation of this tool before the conclusion.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have ~~made~~ a annotated bibliography section and a limitation section		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a annotated bibliography section and a limitation section.

	===Suggestion of improvement:===		===Suggestion of improvement:===
	*The reference list should maintain name of the author, the name of the page the article is collected and sometimes the date it is read. This is so that it is easier to quickly see where the source is from, and if it is legit.		*The reference list should maintain name of the author, the name of the page the article is collected and sometimes the date it is read. This is so that it is easier to quickly see where the source is from, and if it is legit.
	*The pictures are a little small; the text can be hard to read. So adjusting them up would improve the quality.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': You are right. That´s now fixed
			*The pictures are a little small; the text can be hard to read. So adjusting them up would improve the quality.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Good idea. I will try to adjust the pictures
	*I would suggest to make a own section about limitation of the tool, so that there is more discussion and not just explanation of theories.		*I would suggest to make a own section about limitation of the tool, so that there is more discussion and not just explanation of theories.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have created a limitation section

	==Review 2:==		==Review 2:==
	Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:		Nice job, it has a good structure and understandable headlines. Here is a few pointers:
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the positiv comment
	*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.		*Where is the abstract? The first paragraph sounds like a definition of project change. An abstract should describe what the article is about and conclusions from the entire article.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have created a introduction in the beginning of the article and the conclusion is in the end of the article.
	*A recommendation is to delete “In this article, the following topics will be described…” and the topics, that’s what the content table is for.		*A recommendation is to delete “In this article, the following topics will be described…” and the topics, that’s what the content table is for.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks for the advice. I have been referring to the table instead.
	*The models look very nice and are well explained, good. Great job if you made them yourself but if not, remember a reference.		*The models look very nice and are well explained, good. Great job if you made them yourself but if not, remember a reference.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':Thanks a lot. The figures has now references.
	*Missing references all over the article, remember to insert references every time you write a fact. Also it's missing names ect.		*Missing references all over the article, remember to insert references every time you write a fact. Also it's missing names ect.
			'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':This is now fixed.

AndreasAndersen at 11:52, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T11:52:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 28 September 2015
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.		* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.
	* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.		* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.
	'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': ~~Thans~~ for ~~alle~~ the positiv comments		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thanks for all the positiv comments

	===Improvement areas: ===		===Improvement areas: ===
	* There are some grammatical errors. Mostly spelling and some sentences that are missing words like “the, are, is”. To increase the flow for the reader this should be corrected. For example :”… very difficult thing master.,” where “to” is missing to complete the sentence.		* There are some grammatical errors. Mostly spelling and some sentences that are missing words like “the, are, is”. To increase the flow for the reader this should be corrected. For example :”… very difficult thing master.,” where “to” is missing to complete the sentence.
	''Answer from AndreasAndersen:'' I have been reading the article many times now to correct all the grammatical errors.		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': I have been reading the article many times now to correct all the grammatical errors.
	*To me the reference list is not easy to understand, but it is most likely not completed.		*To me the reference list is not easy to understand, but it is most likely not completed.
	''Answer from AndreasAndersen:'' The reference list is now completed		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': The reference list is now completed
	*There is no annotated bibliography or description of limitation of this tool before the conclusion.		*There is no annotated bibliography or description of limitation of this tool before the conclusion.
	''Answer from AndreasAndersen:''I have made a annotated bibliography section and a limitation section		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''':I have made a annotated bibliography section and a limitation section

	===Suggestion of improvement:===		===Suggestion of improvement:===

AndreasAndersen at 11:52, 28 September 2015

2015-09-28T11:52:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 28 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Mette: I like your idea. It seems like you want to look at different theories, model and methods in your article for have to manage project changes, but maybe you should consider to just focus on one or two model/method. This way it is possible to go deeper with the chosen model(s) and to discuss the differens between the use of the models.		''''''Bold text''''''Mette: I like your idea. It seems like you want to look at different theories, model and methods in your article for have to manage project changes, but maybe you should consider to just focus on one or two model/method. This way it is possible to go deeper with the chosen model(s) and to discuss the differens between the use of the models.

	==s150799 reviewer nr.1==		==s150799 reviewer nr.1==
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.		* Good explanation too graphical illustration in the text, this gives a good overall appearance and is highly effective.
	* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.		* “Management of Project Change” is an interesting project management tool, and the text explain it so it is easily understood.
	''Answer from AndreasAndersen:'' Thans for alle the positiv comments		'''Answer from AndreasAndersen''': Thans for alle the positiv comments

	===Improvement areas: ===		===Improvement areas: ===