Talk:Meeting Management - Revision history

Furkan: /* Answer 7 */

2019-02-25T09:22:22Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 25 February 2019
Line 194:		Line 194:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''Some of the references are not including page number. (References: 2,4,5,7,8)The article does not include an annotated bibliography. It can be included. There is no empirical evidence in the article. Current studies about meetings, in the literature could help to improve data and argument.''

2019-02-25T09:14:57Z

Answer 5

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 25 February 2019
Line 168:		Line 168:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is relevant and practical for P/P/P management. Because meetings are important for management and we can see this clearly in the article.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T09:11:57Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 25 February 2019
Line 180:		Line 180:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is not interesting but useful for meetings. It is a good summary of the literature about a meeting. In this last week of the deadline, the author can search for more resources, tools and examples in the real companies.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T09:05:25Z

Answer 4

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 25 February 2019
Line 156:		Line 156:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There are no tables or figures.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T09:04:42Z

Answer 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 25 February 2019
Line 144:		Line 144:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The article is grammatically correct. Language is precise.''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T09:04:22Z

Question 3 · TEXT

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:04, 25 February 2019
Line 142:		Line 142:

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	~~The article is grammatically correct. Language is precise.~~

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===

2019-02-25T09:03:57Z

Question 3 · TEXT

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 25 February 2019
Line 142:		Line 142:

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

			The article is grammatically correct. Language is precise.

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===

2019-02-25T00:06:31Z

Answer 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 25 February 2019
Line 132:		Line 132:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''The argument is clear enough and there is a logical flow in the article. The idea is explained step by step without contradictions. In my view, there should be some concrete examples of successful meeting management in real companies. The idea is explained theoretically. For example, it was a good citation from Air Force Guide. Furthermore, "Techniques and tools for conducting meeting" part can be more explained with examples. I think it is relative to P/P/P Management.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===

2019-02-25T00:06:08Z

Question 2 · TEXT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:06, 25 February 2019
Line 130:		Line 130:

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

	~~The argument is clear enough and there is a logical flow in the article.~~

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===

2019-02-24T23:56:27Z

Question 2 · TEXT

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 24 February 2019
Line 130:		Line 130:

	What would you suggest to improve?		What would you suggest to improve?

			The argument is clear enough and there is a logical flow in the article.

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===