Talk:Programming a project with the CPM - Revision history

S161563: /* Response to feedback */

2018-02-22T14:41:22Z

Response to feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 22 February 2018
Line 201:		Line 201:
	''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''		''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''

	==Response to feedback==		==Response to feedback 2==

	Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.		Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.

2018-02-22T14:41:08Z

Response to feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 22 February 2018
Line 108:		Line 108:


	==Response to feedback==		==Response to feedback 1==

	Thank you for your nice feedback. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures near to the text they refer. Thank you again for your contribution.		Thank you for your nice feedback. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures near to the text they refer. Thank you again for your contribution.

2018-02-22T14:40:31Z

Response to feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 22 February 2018
Line 108:		Line 108:


	===Response to feedback===		==Response to feedback==

	Thank you for your nice feedback. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures near to the text they refer. Thank you again for your contribution.		Thank you for your nice feedback. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures near to the text they refer. Thank you again for your contribution.

2018-02-22T14:37:06Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 22 February 2018
Line 201:		Line 201:
	''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''		''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''

	~~'''~~ Response to feedback ~~'''~~		==Response to feedback==

	Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.		Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.

2018-02-22T14:36:27Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 22 February 2018
Line 201:		Line 201:
	''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''		''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''

	Response to feedback		''' Response to feedback '''

	Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.		Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.

2018-02-22T14:36:10Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 22 February 2018
Line 200:		Line 200:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''		''The article cite summarizes in a nice way the key references and the annotated bibliography is ok, but I would recommended to add more on it.''

			Response to feedback

			Thank you for your nice feedback and comments. As I can see you state almost the same comments as the other reviewer, and this is logical. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures at the correct point. Additionally, I have included more academic references.

2018-02-22T14:30:16Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 22 February 2018
Line 15:		Line 15:
	===Response to feedback===		===Response to feedback===

	Thank you for your feedback. I have included in the article how this technique has changed nowadays and how it's evolving, refering to the DPM. Also I have included more academic sources.		Thank you for your feedback. I have changed the abstract to be more specific as well as I have included in the article how this technique has changed nowadays and how it's evolving, refering to the DPM. Also I have included more academic sources, as you mentioned.

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sofie Melchior Karlson''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sofie Melchior Karlson''==

2018-02-20T13:55:45Z

Answer 7

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 20 February 2018
Line 106:		Line 106:
	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''Yes there is prperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography, but shouldn't there be added more in it?''		''Yes there is prperly citing. It is based on data. Nice with the annotated bibliography, but shouldn't there be added more in it?''


			===Response to feedback===

			Thank you for your nice feedback. I have divided the "Application" section into sub-sections and I have placed the pictures near to the text they refer. Thank you again for your contribution.

	==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nikoleta Kolitsopoulou''==		==Feedback 2 \| Reviewer name: ''Nikoleta Kolitsopoulou''==

2018-02-20T13:51:33Z

Abstract Feedback

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 20 February 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	When developing your article find more relevant sources, use google for a first approach, your first reference is not good enough, I recommend you to use dtu-library database sources.		When developing your article find more relevant sources, use google for a first approach, your first reference is not good enough, I recommend you to use dtu-library database sources.


			===Response to feedback===

			Thank you for your feedback. I have included in the article how this technique has changed nowadays and how it's evolving, refering to the DPM. Also I have included more academic sources.

	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sofie Melchior Karlson''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sofie Melchior Karlson''==

2018-02-19T18:26:11Z

Answer 6

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:26, 19 February 2018
Line 175:		Line 175:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	'' ''		''On the web are a lot of sites or blogs that are referred on this method (CPM), but I think that this article is quite comprehensive and presents an nice overview of this topic.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===