Talk:Project Risk Management and Project Risk Management Processes - Revision history

Ch.filis: /* Reviewer 2: s141573 */

2015-09-27T16:11:14Z

Reviewer 2: s141573

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 27 September 2015
Line 62:		Line 62:

	'''Answer:'''		'''Answer:'''
	As i explained before, the project risk management ~~methodology~~
			As i explained before, the method has been explained in a detailed way in the article but however, the method itself is not an "expertised" one(is a method that can be implemented in every kind of project). Moreover, the methodology is totally connected with the project management as the article describes how(processes section) the method is implemented in projects. As far as the section of root cause analysis is concerned, it is also tottaly connected with the rest of the article in the sense that is a more specific approach in order to enhance the effectiveness of the risk management by trying to focus not only on the possible risks but on the causes of those risks. I made some changes after your comments in order to present it in a more clear way.

			Thank your for the review and good luck with the course!!!

Ch.filis: /* Reviewer 2: s141573 */

2015-09-27T15:30:20Z

Reviewer 2: s141573

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 27 September 2015
Line 60:		Line 60:

	Good luck with the course!		Good luck with the course!

			'''Answer:'''
			As i explained before, the project risk management methodology

Ch.filis: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-26T14:37:14Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:37, 26 September 2015
Line 22:		Line 22:
	'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets		'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets
	*The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there are uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards, the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more "focused" process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effectiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented.My point is that all the parts are built on each other and every part is connected to each other. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method and because it is not linked with a specific type of project management(For example project risk management in constructions projects). However, the article explains the methodology in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamics and the importance of this methodology.		*The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there are uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards, the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more "focused" process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effectiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented.My point is that all the parts are built on each other and every part is connected to each other. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method and because it is not linked with a specific type of project management(For example project risk management in constructions projects). However, the article explains the methodology in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamics and the importance of this methodology.
	Thank you very much for your comments!!!		Thank you very much for your comments and good luck with your article!!!

	== Reviewer 3: s142911==		== Reviewer 3: s142911==

Ch.filis: /* Reviewer 3: s142911 */

2015-09-26T14:36:24Z

Reviewer 3: s142911

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 26 September 2015
Line 41:		Line 41:

	*Since project risk management is a wide topic, you could add some aspect or go more in depth in aspect which are already in it.		*Since project risk management is a wide topic, you could add some aspect or go more in depth in aspect which are already in it.

			'''Answer:'''
			* 2 more limitations of the methodology have been added after your comment.
			* The figures 1 and 2 are necessary because they present useful information as far as important milestones of the methodology and the areas of the uncertainties in projects are concerned. Moreover if i place them on the side, the overall image of the section will be influenced due to the size of the pictures.
			* I corrected the acronym as you mentioned
			* I agree that the topic is wide and thats why i decided to focus on the root cause analysis and the corrective actions (with an extra problem solving model), in order to present a specific method to enhance the effectiveness of the project risk management.

			Thank you very much for your review. Good luck to you too!!!

	== Reviewer 2: s141573==		== Reviewer 2: s141573==

Ch.filis: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-26T12:01:16Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 26 September 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:

	'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets		'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets
	*The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there are uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards, the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effectiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented.My point is that all the parts are built on each other and every part is connected to each other. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method and because it is not linked with a specific type of project management(For example project risk management in constructions projects). However, the article explains the methodology in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamics and the importance of this methodology.		*The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there are uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards, the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more "focused" process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effectiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented.My point is that all the parts are built on each other and every part is connected to each other. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method and because it is not linked with a specific type of project management(For example project risk management in constructions projects). However, the article explains the methodology in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamics and the importance of this methodology.
	Thank you very much for your comments!!!		Thank you very much for your comments!!!

Ch.filis: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-26T11:59:48Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 26 September 2015
Line 21:		Line 21:

	'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets		'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets
	*~~I dont think that the article should be 3000 words. It should be no more than 3000 words and mine after some interventions is 2500.~~ The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the ~~effetctiveness~~ of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method. However, the article explains it in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the ~~dynamic~~ and the importance of this methodology.		*The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there are uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards, the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effectiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented.My point is that all the parts are built on each other and every part is connected to each other. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method and because it is not linked with a specific type of project management(For example project risk management in constructions projects). However, the article explains the methodology in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamics and the importance of this methodology.
	Thank you very much for your comments!!!		Thank you very much for your comments!!!

Ch.filis: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-26T11:47:30Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 26 September 2015
Line 20:		Line 20:
	* the references used appear to be really focused on the topic		* the references used appear to be really focused on the topic

	'''Answer:'''		'''Answer:'''My answer refers to the first 3 bullets
	*I dont think that the article should be 3000 words. It should be no more than 3000 words and mine after some interventions is 2500. The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effetctiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method. However, the article explains it in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamic and the importance of this methodology.		*I dont think that the article should be 3000 words. It should be no more than 3000 words and mine after some interventions is 2500. The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effetctiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method. However, the article explains it in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamic and the importance of this methodology.
	Thank you very much for your comments!!!		Thank you very much for your comments!!!

Ch.filis: /* Review 1: s150905 */

2015-09-26T11:45:55Z

Review 1: s150905

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:45, 26 September 2015
Line 10:		Line 10:
	* It presents a little lack of punctuation and a few spelling errors		* It presents a little lack of punctuation and a few spelling errors
	* I like the use of the images that help the reader understand better each part		* I like the use of the images that help the reader understand better each part

			'''Answer:'''
			*Spelling and grammar errors have been corrected after your comment.

	Content		Content
Line 16:		Line 19:
	* The link between all the parties of the article are not so clearly liked.		* The link between all the parties of the article are not so clearly liked.
	* the references used appear to be really focused on the topic		* the references used appear to be really focused on the topic

			'''Answer:'''
			*I dont think that the article should be 3000 words. It should be no more than 3000 words and mine after some interventions is 2500. The artcle starts with the history of the methodoly and then presents that in every project there uncertainties(as an introduction to the purpose of this methodology). Afterwards the sources of these uncertainties are explained and then follows the methodology of project risk management( why and how is it applied ). After the extensive analysis of the methodology and its processes, i decided to present a more ''focused'' process that could be used in project risk management that could enhance the effetctiveness of the methodology. Moreover, a model that explains in detail how this proposed process could help is also presented. To sum up i agree that the methodology itself is general because it is not a so "expertised" method. However, the article explains it in an extensive way and in the end proposes a more specific process to give the reader the opportunity to understand the dynamic and the importance of this methodology.
			Thank you very much for your comments!!!

	== Reviewer 3: s142911==		== Reviewer 3: s142911==

S150905 at 09:05, 24 September 2015

2015-09-24T09:05:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 24 September 2015
Line 2:		Line 2:


	~~s150905,~~ Review 1:		==Review 1: s150905==

	Hi, the article appears complete, with a clear topic and its satisfied all the characteristic of the Wiki-article.		Hi, the article appears complete, with a clear topic and its satisfied all the characteristic of the Wiki-article.

S141573 at 21:44, 22 September 2015

2015-09-22T21:44:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:44, 22 September 2015
Line 37:		Line 37:
	== Reviewer 2: s141573==		== Reviewer 2: s141573==
	Good introduction of the theory and how you created the context of the article.		Good introduction of the theory and how you created the context of the article.

	I furthermore found a good flow of concepts all along the reading.		I furthermore found a good flow of concepts all along the reading.

	However sometimes it appears generic, I’d suggest to go more directly to the point and have always in mind to connect the theory to the project management.		However sometimes it appears generic, I’d suggest to go more directly to the point and have always in mind to connect the theory to the project management.

	The section root causes appears disconnected from the rest of the text, maybe explain better the impact of non- identified risks and highlight the importance of corrective actions.		The section root causes appears disconnected from the rest of the text, maybe explain better the impact of non- identified risks and highlight the importance of corrective actions.

	Good luck with the course!		Good luck with the course!