Talk:The importance of Organizational Structures in Portfolio Management - Revision history

Thanosfotis at 21:52, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T21:52:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:52, 25 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''In my opinion, the ~~abstract~~ is ~~not focused~~ enough on the main idea of this article, since actual explanation that article is about the importance of Organizational Structures in Portfolio Management only in second part of the abstract. I would suggest to improve the abstract by being more focused on the ~~subject from the start. The reference number 2 is written in the wrong way. I would suggest to check DTU library guideline and correct that reference~~.''		''In my opinion, the summary is good enough and it makes clear the topic which will be further analyzed.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 41:		Line 41:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''There is a logical flow to this article. However, I would suggest to focus on the main idea and include more information about organizational structures in P.M. and include less information on related topics. Moreover, I think that the “Structure of this article” part is unnecessary in the “Background” part, it should either be in the Abstract part or be deleted totally.''		''There is a good logical flow to this article.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 53:		Line 53:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''I spotted a few grammatical errors. I would suggest to reread “Managing Portfolios” and “Organizational structures” and try to rewrite them so they would have fewer long sentences and would be easier to read.		''In general the grammar is good with a few spelling errors.''

	~~Examples of errors:~~

	~~“The portfolio management office host and provides infrastructure for~~ the ~~portfolio management teams, i.e. providing standard operating procedures for the tracking, reporting and managing activities in a unified and comparable way.” (it should be “[the office] hosts”)~~

	“In contrast to the functional organization structure applied in many companies, the portfolio management office including the portfolio and product managers has a fairly small number of permanent staff members and relies on the ability to set up project and manage the project team composition as the project moves through the different stages.” This sentence is so long that is ~~very hard to see idea in it. It would be better to make~~ a few ~~shorter sentences instead. Also, it should be “to set up projects” or “to set up a project”.~~

	~~“Having an organizational structure can help the organization improve efficiently by balancing the influencing factors such as external environment, strategy, technology and human resources~~.~~” (to improve)~~''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 73:		Line 65:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~There are few figures and tables in an article. It is not clear yet if they summarize the key points, since there is no explanation yet for them.~~ I ~~would suggest to give a description to each table and to check if it is relevant to~~ the ~~topic~~.''		''I like the fact that you have used more than one pictures giving clear point of this article.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 85:		Line 77:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''I ~~see relevance~~ that is mostly academic~~. In order to make this article more practical I would suggest to include an example relevant to the main idea. Furthermore, I suggest to elaborate more on relevance to portfolio management~~.''		''I believe that it is mostly academic.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 97:		Line 89:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~This~~ article is interesting ~~for academic to read. This article shows in details~~ how ~~important is~~ organizational structure to portfolio management~~. I would suggest to elaborate more on the practical side of the subject and include at least one example~~.''		''The article is very interesting while showing how vital the organizational structure for portfolio management is.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 111:		Line 103:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~This article properly cites previous~~ work. ~~References are clear and summarize each part of~~ the article. As mentioned earlier, I suggest to improve reference number 2. I want to stress that some sentences like: “It is not easy and should not be taken for granted” should be properly referenced, otherwise it looks like an opinion rather than being based on empirical data. Moreover, I would suggest to check recommended reading materials, especially “The standard for portfolio management”. Furthermore, it is important to include detailed bibliography.''		''You have used many references and this is very good while showing how professional work you have done. You can also use as a reference the PMBOK.''

Anutka at 15:06, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T15:06:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 25 February 2019
Line 25:		Line 25:

	===Answer 1===		===Answer 1===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''In my opinion, the abstract is not focused enough on the main idea of this article, since actual explanation that article is about the importance of Organizational Structures in Portfolio Management only in second part of the abstract. I would suggest to improve the abstract by being more focused on the subject from the start. The reference number 2 is written in the wrong way. I would suggest to check DTU library guideline and correct that reference.''

	===Question 2 · TEXT===		===Question 2 · TEXT===
Line 41:		Line 41:

	===Answer 2===		===Answer 2===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There is a logical flow to this article. However, I would suggest to focus on the main idea and include more information about organizational structures in P.M. and include less information on related topics. Moreover, I think that the “Structure of this article” part is unnecessary in the “Background” part, it should either be in the Abstract part or be deleted totally.''

	===Question 3 · TEXT===		===Question 3 · TEXT===
Line 53:		Line 53:

	===Answer 3===		===Answer 3===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I spotted a few grammatical errors. I would suggest to reread “Managing Portfolios” and “Organizational structures” and try to rewrite them so they would have fewer long sentences and would be easier to read.

			Examples of errors:

			“The portfolio management office host and provides infrastructure for the portfolio management teams, i.e. providing standard operating procedures for the tracking, reporting and managing activities in a unified and comparable way.” (it should be “[the office] hosts”)

			“In contrast to the functional organization structure applied in many companies, the portfolio management office including the portfolio and product managers has a fairly small number of permanent staff members and relies on the ability to set up project and manage the project team composition as the project moves through the different stages.” This sentence is so long that is very hard to see idea in it. It would be better to make a few shorter sentences instead. Also, it should be “to set up projects” or “to set up a project”.

			“Having an organizational structure can help the organization improve efficiently by balancing the influencing factors such as external environment, strategy, technology and human resources.” (to improve)''

	===Question 4 · TEXT===		===Question 4 · TEXT===
Line 65:		Line 73:

	===Answer 4===		===Answer 4===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''There are few figures and tables in an article. It is not clear yet if they summarize the key points, since there is no explanation yet for them. I would suggest to give a description to each table and to check if it is relevant to the topic.''

	===Question 5 · TEXT===		===Question 5 · TEXT===
Line 77:		Line 85:

	===Answer 5===		===Answer 5===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''I see relevance that is mostly academic. In order to make this article more practical I would suggest to include an example relevant to the main idea. Furthermore, I suggest to elaborate more on relevance to portfolio management.''

	===Question 6 · TEXT===		===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 89:		Line 97:

	===Answer 6===		===Answer 6===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''This article is interesting for academic to read. This article shows in details how important is organizational structure to portfolio management. I would suggest to elaborate more on the practical side of the subject and include at least one example.''

	===Question 7 · TEXT===		===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 103:		Line 111:

	===Answer 7===		===Answer 7===
	''~~Answer here~~''		''This article properly cites previous work. References are clear and summarize each part of the article. As mentioned earlier, I suggest to improve reference number 2. I want to stress that some sentences like: “It is not easy and should not be taken for granted” should be properly referenced, otherwise it looks like an opinion rather than being based on empirical data. Moreover, I would suggest to check recommended reading materials, especially “The standard for portfolio management”. Furthermore, it is important to include detailed bibliography.''

Anutka at 13:00, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T13:00:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 25 February 2019
Line 16:		Line 16:


	==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''~~Sarantis Pavlidis~~''==		==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Anna Shevchenko''==
	===Question 1 · TEXT===		===Question 1 · TEXT===
	'''Quality of the summary:'''		'''Quality of the summary:'''

Anutka at 12:59, 25 February 2019

2019-02-25T12:59:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:59, 25 February 2019
Line 14:		Line 14:

	\|}		\|}


			==Feedback 1 \| Reviewer name: ''Sarantis Pavlidis''==
			===Question 1 · TEXT===
			'''Quality of the summary:'''

			Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 1===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 2 · TEXT===
			'''Structure and logic of the article:'''

			Is the argument clear?

			Is there a logical flow to the article?

			Does one part build upon the other?

			Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 2===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 3 · TEXT===
			'''Grammar and style:'''

			Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

			Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 3===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 4 · TEXT===
			'''Figures and tables:'''

			Are figures and tables clear?

			Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 4===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 5 · TEXT===
			'''Interest and relevance:'''

			Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

			Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 5===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 6 · TEXT===
			'''Depth of treatment:'''

			Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

			Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 6===
			''Answer here''

			===Question 7 · TEXT===
			'''Annotated bibliography:'''

			Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

			Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

			Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

			What would you suggest to improve?

			===Answer 7===
			''Answer here''

Anne: Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to ..."

2019-02-22T19:35:58Z

Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| Good |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good |- |'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to ..."

New page

==Feedback on Abstract==

{|
|'''Text clarity'''|| Good
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Good
|-
|'''Explanation of the purpose of the article'''|| Needs to be elaborated and more specific
|-
|'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| It could be relevant but make sure you don't focus on organisational management but keep the focus within portfolio management. It seems that this article is more relevant for organisational management
|-
|'''References'''|| Missing references. Here are the guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
|-

|}