Talk:Risk Identification

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar.
+
The chosen topic is relevant to project, program and portfolio management. The introduction clearly states what the topic is about leading the reader on to the rest of the article.
 +
 
 +
The text is very objective and it seems that the author is to facts and theories on the subject. The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar.
  
 
It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners.
 
It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners.
  
 
It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text.
 
It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text.
The article is missing some references relevant for the text.
 
  
It also seems that the article has not yet been finished since there are two section at the end of the article with belonging under headings that has not been filled in. They do however seem relevant and interesting. Maybe a section about uncertainty could be relevant for the challenges of risk identification, it is only briefly mentioned.  The article could also use some figures relevant to the Risk identification subject to make it more interesting and to emphasize points made in the article.
+
The article is missing some references relevant for the text making it difficult to suggest if the article has copy pasted material from other sources.
 +
 
 +
It seems though that the article has not yet been finished since there are two section at the end of the article with belonging under headings that has not been filled in. They do however seem relevant and interesting. Maybe a section about uncertainty could be relevant for the challenges of risk management, it is only briefly mentioned.  The article could also use some figures related to the text to make it more interesting and to emphasize point made in the article.
 +
Since the article is not finished my advice is to find a red thread throughout the article to keep it together.

Revision as of 14:10, 22 September 2015

The chosen topic is relevant to project, program and portfolio management. The introduction clearly states what the topic is about leading the reader on to the rest of the article.

The text is very objective and it seems that the author is to facts and theories on the subject. The language in the text is understandable and fluent with no errors on the spelling and grammar.

It guides you through a number of definitions regarding risk and is relevant for interested practitioners.

It would probably be a good idea to make the spacing between the sections in “Definitions and Context” a bit bigger so it does not look like one long text.

The article is missing some references relevant for the text making it difficult to suggest if the article has copy pasted material from other sources.

It seems though that the article has not yet been finished since there are two section at the end of the article with belonging under headings that has not been filled in. They do however seem relevant and interesting. Maybe a section about uncertainty could be relevant for the challenges of risk management, it is only briefly mentioned. The article could also use some figures related to the text to make it more interesting and to emphasize point made in the article. Since the article is not finished my advice is to find a red thread throughout the article to keep it together.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox