Talk:Project Integration Management
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Anna: I think you need to be a bit more specific in scoping your article in regards to which method/tool you want to go in depth with.") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Anna: I think you need to be a bit more specific in scoping your article in regards to which method/tool you want to go in depth with. | Anna: I think you need to be a bit more specific in scoping your article in regards to which method/tool you want to go in depth with. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Feedback= | ||
| + | ==Reviewer 1, DI2009== | ||
| + | *Topic; It seems like an interesting topic (method description). However I had a hard time to figure out, whether or not the title matches the content. | ||
| + | *Introduction; Due to the missing link between the title and the topic, it would have been nice to get a description of the article. Maybe it could start with: “This article describes how Six Sigma can be used in Project Management…”. | ||
| + | *Structure; A structure which gives the reader an overview of the points and states a small conclusion, would help the reader, both catch the readers interest and make it easy for the user to know what the article is about. | ||
| + | *Section introduction; a short introduction to each section would help the reader know what to expect. | ||
| + | *Text; I believe that the article is not finished and still some more elaboration is missing. | ||
| + | *Figures and illustrations; It would be nice with some figures or illustrations to catch the readers interest and help the reader. | ||
| + | *Titles; the titles could be more descriptive e.g. “Overview of the article” and “Idea with using Six Sigma” etc. This will also help the reader in what to expect. | ||
| + | *Annotated Biography; remember that the references should have a short description | ||
| + | *Referencing; I think you should find more academic articles at least if it is possible do not refer to Wikipedia. | ||
Revision as of 15:57, 22 September 2015
Anna: I think you need to be a bit more specific in scoping your article in regards to which method/tool you want to go in depth with.
Feedback
Reviewer 1, DI2009
- Topic; It seems like an interesting topic (method description). However I had a hard time to figure out, whether or not the title matches the content.
- Introduction; Due to the missing link between the title and the topic, it would have been nice to get a description of the article. Maybe it could start with: “This article describes how Six Sigma can be used in Project Management…”.
- Structure; A structure which gives the reader an overview of the points and states a small conclusion, would help the reader, both catch the readers interest and make it easy for the user to know what the article is about.
- Section introduction; a short introduction to each section would help the reader know what to expect.
- Text; I believe that the article is not finished and still some more elaboration is missing.
- Figures and illustrations; It would be nice with some figures or illustrations to catch the readers interest and help the reader.
- Titles; the titles could be more descriptive e.g. “Overview of the article” and “Idea with using Six Sigma” etc. This will also help the reader in what to expect.
- Annotated Biography; remember that the references should have a short description
- Referencing; I think you should find more academic articles at least if it is possible do not refer to Wikipedia.
