Groups vs teams

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Introduction/History)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
The aim of this article is to describe the difference between a group and a team in terms of project management and to understand the two different formations.
+
Groups and teams are important structures in organizational settings that can help individuals achieve shared goals. Although the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct differences that affect their effectiveness in achieving these goals. A group is a collection of individuals who come together based on shared interests, values, or goals. A team, on the other hand, is a specific type of group with a common purpose, shared responsibility for outcomes, and interdependence among members. Understanding these differences can help organizations determine which approach is best suited for their needs.
  
At first this article outlines what a group and a team is. Then different types of both groups and teams will be introduced in order to understand how and why groups and teams are created and combined the way they are. Afterwards, the article compares groups versus teams in relation to the dynamics, how to motivate, performance, how to lead and the communication. This article also covers problem-solving, management as well as it goes into how and when groups and teams are successful in depth.
+
This article provides an overview of the different types of groups and teams, including formal and informal groups, command groups, interest groups, cross-functional teams, functional teams, problem-solving teams, project teams, self-managed teams, and virtual teams. We describe the characteristics of each type and provide examples of their applications in various settings.
  
Secondly, it will be discussed when and where each type of formation is most appropriate and why to use the specific formation. It will be discussed what benefits that might be achieved and in which situations project management is successful. The use of groups and teams in theory might occur different than how the real situation take place. This is the reason why it is important to follow the scientific ways of creating teams and groups but also to take the personal perspective into account.
+
Furthermore, we discuss the use of groups and teams in organizations, including the benefits and limitations of using these structures. We also examine the challenges associated with group work, such as groupthink, conflicts, and coordination challenges, and provide strategies for mitigating these challenges.
  
The last thing that will be covered by this article is the limitations of both groups and teams regarding project, program, and portfolio management. In this section a critical reflection also illustrates the disadvantage that might follow with the wrong formation or use of a group or a team. How these weaknesses can lead to decision-making problems and in the end effect and challenge the goal that the group or team has been given.
+
By understanding the differences between groups and teams, individuals and organizations can better leverage the strengths of these structures to achieve optimal outcomes. This article provides valuable insights into how to effectively use groups and teams in organizational settings.
  
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
  
== Introduction/History ==
+
== Introduction ==
once
+
Groups and teams are critical components of organizational success. While the two terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct differences that affect their effectiveness in achieving shared goals. A group is a collection of individuals who come together based on shared interests, values, or goals. A team, on the other hand, is a specific type of group with a common purpose, shared responsibility for outcomes, and interdependence among members.
 +
 
 +
Understanding the differences between groups and teams can help organizations and individuals determine which approach is best suited for their needs. This article provides an overview of the different types of groups and teams, their characteristics, and applications. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of using groups and teams in organizational settings, and provide strategies for overcoming the challenges associated with group work.
 +
 
 +
By leveraging the strengths of these structures, individuals and organizations can better achieve their goals and maximize productivity. This article serves as a valuable resource for anyone looking to better understand the nuances of groups and teams in organizational settings.
  
 
== Big Idea ==
 
== Big Idea ==

Revision as of 23:09, 19 February 2023

Written by Sofie Heide-Ottosen

Abstract

Groups and teams are important structures in organizational settings that can help individuals achieve shared goals. Although the terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct differences that affect their effectiveness in achieving these goals. A group is a collection of individuals who come together based on shared interests, values, or goals. A team, on the other hand, is a specific type of group with a common purpose, shared responsibility for outcomes, and interdependence among members. Understanding these differences can help organizations determine which approach is best suited for their needs.

This article provides an overview of the different types of groups and teams, including formal and informal groups, command groups, interest groups, cross-functional teams, functional teams, problem-solving teams, project teams, self-managed teams, and virtual teams. We describe the characteristics of each type and provide examples of their applications in various settings.

Furthermore, we discuss the use of groups and teams in organizations, including the benefits and limitations of using these structures. We also examine the challenges associated with group work, such as groupthink, conflicts, and coordination challenges, and provide strategies for mitigating these challenges.

By understanding the differences between groups and teams, individuals and organizations can better leverage the strengths of these structures to achieve optimal outcomes. This article provides valuable insights into how to effectively use groups and teams in organizational settings.

Contents


Introduction

Groups and teams are critical components of organizational success. While the two terms are often used interchangeably, they have distinct differences that affect their effectiveness in achieving shared goals. A group is a collection of individuals who come together based on shared interests, values, or goals. A team, on the other hand, is a specific type of group with a common purpose, shared responsibility for outcomes, and interdependence among members.

Understanding the differences between groups and teams can help organizations and individuals determine which approach is best suited for their needs. This article provides an overview of the different types of groups and teams, their characteristics, and applications. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of using groups and teams in organizational settings, and provide strategies for overcoming the challenges associated with group work.

By leveraging the strengths of these structures, individuals and organizations can better achieve their goals and maximize productivity. This article serves as a valuable resource for anyone looking to better understand the nuances of groups and teams in organizational settings.

Big Idea

Groups and teams are both defined as a set of people of two or more working together on a task, but the two gatherings differ from eachother on especially one point. The members of a group is individuals meaning that everyone works towards a seperate goal, and is only responsible for their own work. What unifies the groupmembers is only a common interest. On the other hand there is the team what is a collection of teammembers who share the same goal or is working to accomplish a shared purpose. Here the members of the team has mutual accountability. Furthermore the success of groups is measured individually where the team only can succeed or fail collectively.

Formation

Types

Diversity

Dynamics

Motivation

Performance

Leadership

Communiacation

Conflicts/Problem-solving

Management

Successfull groups and teams

Application

When and why to use what?

Successfull project management

Discussion and limitations

Pros anf cons Biases and how to prevent

Annotated bibliography

Bibliography

Ramirez, Consuelo M. (2014). TEAMS - A competency-based approach. Routledge, 1. edition.

Wheelan, Susan A. (2013). Creating effective teams. Sage publications, 4. edition.

Thompson, Leigh (2012). Making the team: A guide for managers. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 4. edition.

Williams, Hank (1996). Essence of managing groups and teams. Pearson P T R, 1. edition.

Griffin, Ricky W. (2022). Management. Cengage, 13. edition.

Forsyth, Donelson R. (2019). Group Dynamics. Cengage, 7. edition.

Piercy, Cameron W. (2019). Problem solving in Teams and Groups. University of Kansas Libraries.

Levi, Daniel (2015). Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications, 5. edition.

Beck, Stephenson J. & Co. (2022). The emerald handbook of group and team communication research. Emerald publishing limited, 1. edition

Brounstein, Marty (2009). Managing teams for dummies. Wiley publishing.

Wellington, Pat (2012). Managing successful teams. Kogan Page Limited.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox