Talk:Lean as a project management tool
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. As you write Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool. | Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. As you write Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Review1 given by S152093== | ||
| + | * Good article overall. I learned something from it, and it was very informative. A few typos here and there, but there is a full week to correct that :-) In my eyes it gives a very good overview, which is really good. Alternatively you could have chosen a specific area to go in depth with. A few specific comments: | ||
| + | * In “the Lean Structure” I think it would be a little easier to get an overview if the titles were included in the bullets, instead of only in the picture. The picture is really good though, as it gives a quick overview. | ||
| + | * In the next section the titles would be nice as well, but then in the section about how lean can be used as a tool it is included, and that is nice. | ||
| + | * If possible, link to other articles under Gantt chart, QCD-triangle etc. | ||
| + | * When the different parts of the Lean philosophy is described, it would be very useful for me to have the different steps compared to the “traditional” PM methods. You do it at the end of the article, but it would create an easier understanding for me, if there were some concrete examples on where it differs. | ||
| + | * You mention that other PM methods could be more useful in the conclusion. It would be really nice with an example of that, either here or somewhere else in the article. | ||
| + | * Maybe a little more talk about the limitations? | ||
| + | * The three sections, “The Lean Stucture”, “What is Lean as a project management tool?”, and “How can Lean be use as a project management tool?” are a little repetitive to me. Maybe to write it into less sections, or a little more defined outline of the sections would make it a little more clear to me. | ||
| + | * The bibliography is missing the part from the structure “Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic”. | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 22 September 2015
Mette: I like the idea and the topic you have chosen. As you write Lean contains many tools, so you could maybe consider if you should focus on only one tool in case of not getting your hands too full. It would still be possible to look at the questions you have presented by only looking at one tool.
Review1 given by S152093
- Good article overall. I learned something from it, and it was very informative. A few typos here and there, but there is a full week to correct that :-) In my eyes it gives a very good overview, which is really good. Alternatively you could have chosen a specific area to go in depth with. A few specific comments:
- In “the Lean Structure” I think it would be a little easier to get an overview if the titles were included in the bullets, instead of only in the picture. The picture is really good though, as it gives a quick overview.
- In the next section the titles would be nice as well, but then in the section about how lean can be used as a tool it is included, and that is nice.
- If possible, link to other articles under Gantt chart, QCD-triangle etc.
- When the different parts of the Lean philosophy is described, it would be very useful for me to have the different steps compared to the “traditional” PM methods. You do it at the end of the article, but it would create an easier understanding for me, if there were some concrete examples on where it differs.
- You mention that other PM methods could be more useful in the conclusion. It would be really nice with an example of that, either here or somewhere else in the article.
- Maybe a little more talk about the limitations?
- The three sections, “The Lean Stucture”, “What is Lean as a project management tool?”, and “How can Lean be use as a project management tool?” are a little repetitive to me. Maybe to write it into less sections, or a little more defined outline of the sections would make it a little more clear to me.
- The bibliography is missing the part from the structure “Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic”.
