Talk:The Gantt Chart
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements.") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements. | Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Review 1, Nannats''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Generally, the whole article is easy to understand, which is nice. But be aware of the language do not become too much ’spoken’ language, and too long sentences. | ||
+ | * I like the example with the light – also easy to understand :-) | ||
+ | * I think it is good that you suggest real tools for creating Gantt Charts. | ||
+ | * You mention The Critical Path Method, which is nice! You could consider to link to the Wiki article about the Critical path method. The same as for the WBS. | ||
+ | * There are some spelling errors - watch out for these :-) | ||
+ | * You should consider the layout of the sentence under figure 1 (''"to the Gantt Chart by using arrows as shown in Figure 3.”''), to make it easier for the reader to read. | ||
+ | * The figure 2 is taking up a lot of space. Maybe you could remove some of the white frame in the figure. | ||
+ | * I was a little confused about figure 3, so it might be an idea to explain what a predecessor activity and a successor activity is. | ||
+ | * I think the video is god, but as your article is a bit short, you could consider writing the guide on how to create a Gantt Chart yourself. |
Revision as of 19:36, 22 September 2015
Anna: I like your topic idea and that it focuses on a single project management tool. It also seem that you have read and understood the structure requirements.
Review 1, Nannats
- Generally, the whole article is easy to understand, which is nice. But be aware of the language do not become too much ’spoken’ language, and too long sentences.
- I like the example with the light – also easy to understand :-)
- I think it is good that you suggest real tools for creating Gantt Charts.
- You mention The Critical Path Method, which is nice! You could consider to link to the Wiki article about the Critical path method. The same as for the WBS.
- There are some spelling errors - watch out for these :-)
- You should consider the layout of the sentence under figure 1 ("to the Gantt Chart by using arrows as shown in Figure 3.”), to make it easier for the reader to read.
- The figure 2 is taking up a lot of space. Maybe you could remove some of the white frame in the figure.
- I was a little confused about figure 3, so it might be an idea to explain what a predecessor activity and a successor activity is.
- I think the video is god, but as your article is a bit short, you could consider writing the guide on how to create a Gantt Chart yourself.