Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| − | == '''Reviewer | + | == '''Reviewer 3, 150477''' == |
The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m. | The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m. | ||
| − | + | * The abstract sounds interesting and your parts constructed in a logical way. | |
| + | * The last part has been written twice, be careful! | ||
| + | * Relevant topic with Risks in Construction. | ||
| + | * Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-) | ||
| + | * Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly. | ||
Revision as of 21:04, 22 September 2015
KB1991, reviewer 2:
- What there is written so far is good.
- Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
- The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
- Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺
s150905, Review 2:
The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing
- The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
- The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work
Reviewer 3, 150477
The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m.
- The abstract sounds interesting and your parts constructed in a logical way.
- The last part has been written twice, be careful!
- Relevant topic with Risks in Construction.
- Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
- Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.
