Talk:Risk Profile in General Contracting
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Reviewer 3 (s141573)) |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
==Reviewer 3 (s141573)== | ==Reviewer 3 (s141573)== | ||
The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects. | The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects. | ||
+ | |||
I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice! | I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice! | ||
+ | |||
However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing. | However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing. | ||
+ | |||
Looking forward for the final article! | Looking forward for the final article! |
Revision as of 22:42, 22 September 2015
KB1991, reviewer 2:
- What there is written so far is good.
- Good introduction that describes the topic briefly, but the last part has been written twice.
- The structure looks fine both regards to the formatting and the red threat.
- Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺
s150905, Review 2:
The idea behind this article seem really interesting, but most of the article itself is missing
- The sketched structure appears to be just a draft of the final one, and if the one I see now is the final one I think is not satisfactory for a good work
- The lack of text and imagines make impossible to me to do some actual consideration about the work
Reviewer 3, 150477
The article has been accessed the 22/09/2015 at 21 p.m.
- The abstract sounds interesting and your parts constructed in a logical way.
- The last part has been written twice, be careful!
- Relevant topic with Risks in Construction.
- Impatient to read your article (i am civil engineering student ;-)
- Difficult actually to evaluate your article properly.
Reviewer 3 (s141573)
The topic is really interesting and it also seems very actual in construction projects.
I like the introduction which I find clear and well structured, keep attention a part is repeated twice!
However, it's hard to give a feedback since most part of the article is missing.
Looking forward for the final article!