Talk:Critical Path Method in Construction Industry
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Format) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods | *Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods | ||
*I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT | *I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==alex161 (reviewer 1)== | ||
| + | In general I like the topic and I read it nicely, the structure seems good . Something is missing around the article but I think you are on a good way. Good job! | ||
| + | Structure | ||
| + | *Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it . | ||
| + | *The figure are appropried with the topics | ||
| + | *Remember to add the sources to the figures . | ||
| + | |||
| + | Contents | ||
| + | *I think that the short history part is a good way to start , it is very concise and understandable | ||
| + | *Try to explain bettter the example of CPM graph creation | ||
| + | *The flow of the article is linear and logical without any problem to understand the topics . | ||
| + | *Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography | ||
| + | *Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points . | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 22 September 2015
Anna: I don't have a lot to say about your abstract. It is a very good choice of topic and you have managed to focus on a specific method. The overall structure seems good also, so I believe this could be a very interesting and useful article when completed.
Contents |
Feedback from s150821 (reviewer 3)
- The article is well written, its reading is fluent and really engaging. Its structure follows perfectly what it is requested by the assignment.
- Images are exhaustive , they give the reader a quick understanding of the topic;
- External links to other pages of Wikipedia are a good idea, they make the article understanding easier;
- References are punctual and from reliable sources;
- The only deficiency of this article is in “Use Limitations” section; while situations in which this method can be applied are well treated along the article , use limitations of CPM are not as comprehensive as it is the whole article.
(Review 2, S145166)
Format
- Very good abstract summarising article. Follows 'methods' article structure well
- Good use of graphics
- some small grammar errors - read through again
- referencing error in 5. method advantages
Content
- Add an annotated bibliography
- Could include further discussion or just suggested reading about CPM computer programs mentioned
- Could be more critical or add more detail to limitations. maybe compare to alternative methods
- I think you should reference to APPPM wiki articles over “real wiki” articles. eg. PERT
alex161 (reviewer 1)
In general I like the topic and I read it nicely, the structure seems good . Something is missing around the article but I think you are on a good way. Good job! Structure
- Summary is written in a good and understandable way, I like it .
- The figure are appropried with the topics
- Remember to add the sources to the figures .
Contents
- I think that the short history part is a good way to start , it is very concise and understandable
- Try to explain bettter the example of CPM graph creation
- The flow of the article is linear and logical without any problem to understand the topics .
- Remember to add some brief summary to the bibliography
- Maybe you should improve the limitations and method advantagess, with some sentences explaining a bit more than the bullet points .
