Talk:SCRUM Method

Latest revision as of 00:53, 29 September 2015

Mette: Hey, I like your idea. Perhaps you need to be more specific of what exactly it is you want to look at in your article, what you want to study and discuss in your article. Maybe you have a particular aspect to look at, study in your article.

Reviewer 2 :Andkamp

Formal aspects:

• Great interest on the method described on the article, with nice structure and points
• Nice style, with precise sentences, but maybe it needs a little improvement in English as it has some minor mistakes (for example: insure the team working on highest valued features->to ensure that the team is...)
• Nice figures, but better quality and explanation of them would be appreciated
• Better structure as a wiki article would be preferable as there are no inter-wiki or other in text hyperlinks
• Do not know if the author has the right to use those images as there is no reference
• Pictures are nicely placed
• Scrum method seems highly interesting for a practitioner, although no real implementation were presented in the article

Content aspects:

• Firmly related to the topic of project management
• Appropriate length, although points 2.1.1-2.2.5 could be a little more extensive
• More things could be added in the introduction section
• One sided sources and only sites, no proper literature
• Could be connected with other articles through a see also section
• Could add some real examples of implementation of this method

All in all it is a nice article that gave me some understanding of SCRUM method but the lack of bibliography and implementations,as well as the small extent of points 2.1.1-2.2.5 made me a have more questions than answers after reading it.

Answer 2 Andkamp : Thank you for your review. It is very nice to read your feedback that was also very helpful.

• I have added references to the images
• The implementation reflects the rules and conditions on how to use the method.
• The points 2.1.1-2.2.5 were enough in order to fully present the roles of the scrum method, as more detailed explanation was provided in method implementation.
• In my opinion, the introduction need to be brief explanation of the method history and main aspects.
• I do not agree that there was no proper literature. It was just correctly added to the annotated bibliography; references were named.

Reviewer 1 :DanielKrogh

Formal aspects

• Has fine structure with the necessary elements of the type of article
• The sentences is precise and easy to understand
• Missing a reference on the figures and figure numbers. In addition there is missing reference to the actual figures in the text.
• The figure is clear and has a great size
• The article is formatted well and the references are made properly and has the necessary sub headings.

Content aspects

• The topic is interesting and can definitely be used for a practitioner.
• It is fairly related to the topic of project management.
• It could use an example from real life so the reader can have something to relate to.
• I think the number of references is sufficient.
• The article does not contain an annotated bibliography.

The article was nice to read and gave me an insight of SCRUM method. The article is well formulated and clear.

Answer 1 DanielKrogh : Thank you for your good review. 

• I have added references and numbers to the figures.
• The annotated bibliography was added.

Reviwer 2 : Buurbuur

• It have a good structure, with good headings and sub headings
• I find the subject very relevant as a project management tool
• I interesting of know who if SCRUM is relevant for all company/business or are there one kind of company where it makes more sense to use than another?
• I find it little confusing that in the end you in the tittle write about advantages, and pitfalls, but don't mention any pitfalls, but only challenges in the section
• However I find the beginning of section about method description confusing and hard to understand
• Make a reference to the pictures in the text, because your pictures are pretty awesome, and can make it much more understandable.
• Good that you substantiate your claims with literature in the advantages and pitfall section

Answer 2 Buurbuur : Thank you for your review. I am glad to hear you had a good impression of my article.

• It is clearly stated in the article where the Scrum method is more relevant and mentioned the disadvantages of implementing it in another companies.
• The pitfalls part was updated. Thank you for noticing that.
• I made test more clear in the beginning of the article.
• I have added references to the pictures.