Talk:Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | --->Answer to the feedback: | ||
| + | [== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Username : Michaelnguyendtu <br> | Username : Michaelnguyendtu <br> | ||
Review 1: <br> | Review 1: <br> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
* The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing. | * The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing. | ||
*The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”? | *The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Group 10: Marazaki Ilektra s142899 | ||
| + | Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | --->Answer to the feedback: | ||
| + | [== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewer 2: s141592 | ||
| + | |||
| + | To begin with,in general this article is very clear and every one can understand the purpose of the article without knowing much about Portfolio Management. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Formal aspects: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *This article is free of grammatical errors or spelling errors. | ||
| + | *The most of the sentences are very clear but some of them should be shorter instead of long winded. | ||
| + | *By reading this you can understand the meaning of the article. | ||
| + | *The article is written formal and it follows the wiki standards. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Content aspects: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *I do not think that it is an article is helpful for practitioner because it describes Portfolio Management from a very general view. | ||
| + | *The size of the article is perfect,not too long or too short.Everyone can read it without being board or not understanding. | ||
| + | *Most of the parts are pretty tied together and you can notice the escalation of the parts very clear. | ||
| + | *The summary contains the most of the parts that you will meat in the article. | ||
| + | *The article also provides many sources and several studies and practical cases. | ||
| + | *The article does not contain bibliography. | ||
| + | *I do not think that the article seems to be copy and paste because by reading it you can notice the authors mentality. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:48, 29 September 2015
--->Answer to the feedback: [== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]]
Username : Michaelnguyendtu
Review 1:
Hello, as an overall perspective the article is very well written, and you have a great knowledge about the theory. On the other hands you still need the last details as literature, references, figures and layout to make it complete. Good work! Formal aspects
- The article has an overall good academically sound to it, which makes it pleasant to read!
- Short and precise sentences which makes the article easy to read. Grammar in the article is also very neat!
- The structure is at this point good; however sub headlines in the final version would make it easier to navigate.
- For the layout in the chapter: Goals of Portfolio Management, it would maybe be “easier for the eye” to look at by using line break between the numbers 1-5.
- As this is a draft I am sure that the final version would have figures to illustrate some of the point, if not this could be a consideration.
- Annotated bibliography is at this point missing as you have also stated, important also to remember to attach some description to these.
Content
- The article is less than the required amount of words which makes room for more if you feel something is still missing.
- The “Scope definition” could maybe have a more concrete description what the article exactly is to “discover”?
Group 10: Marazaki Ilektra s142899 Portfolio Management and complexity in organizations
--->Answer to the feedback: [== ALL THE FEEDBACK WILL BE CONSIDERED AND CHANGED AS SOON AS I HAND IN THE ARTICLE FOR ALL THE REVIEWERS! DUE TO UNEXPECTED REASONS I WILLHAVE TO HAND IT IN LATER THAN TODAY--THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK! ==]]
Reviewer 2: s141592
To begin with,in general this article is very clear and every one can understand the purpose of the article without knowing much about Portfolio Management.
Formal aspects:
- This article is free of grammatical errors or spelling errors.
- The most of the sentences are very clear but some of them should be shorter instead of long winded.
- By reading this you can understand the meaning of the article.
- The article is written formal and it follows the wiki standards.
Content aspects:
- I do not think that it is an article is helpful for practitioner because it describes Portfolio Management from a very general view.
- The size of the article is perfect,not too long or too short.Everyone can read it without being board or not understanding.
- Most of the parts are pretty tied together and you can notice the escalation of the parts very clear.
- The summary contains the most of the parts that you will meat in the article.
- The article also provides many sources and several studies and practical cases.
- The article does not contain bibliography.
- I do not think that the article seems to be copy and paste because by reading it you can notice the authors mentality.
