Talk:The benefits of systems engineering
(Created page with "Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed.") |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed. | Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | KB1991, reviewer 3: | ||
| + | * I have an idea that the article isn’t completely finished yet ☺ But when looking at the structure of it and the headlines it looks good - Both the formatting and the read threat. | ||
| + | * Good that you have planned to implement figures to illustrate the text. | ||
| + | * There are a few mistakes where words have been swapped, like writing ‘with’ instead of ‘which’. | ||
| + | * Good that there are references to all the text – And looks like the sources is of good quality. | ||
| + | * Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Responce to Reviewer 3:== | ||
| + | You are correct about the article not being finished. It is important for me to know that the planned structure of the article is good and understandable for the reader, thank you for that feedback. I found the misstakes that you highlighted. I will have a careful lookthrough of the article as I'm coming to the end of finishing it. A complete reference list with correct wiki-style will be made at the end of the article, but good that the reader find the references reliable. Thank you for your feedback even though the article is far from finished. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==S150801 Reviewer 1 == | ||
| + | The Benefits of Systems Engineering | ||
| + | ===Overall impression=== | ||
| + | I can see that you are not quite finished here yet. However, I am looking forward to read it when completed. | ||
| + | *I think it is an article with a good flow and easy to read. | ||
| + | *I like your consequent use where to put your references. | ||
| + | *And I think it is good that you are referring to illustrations in you text, I think this will make it easier to understand your points. | ||
| + | ===Rooms for improvement=== | ||
| + | *You are talking about many interesting topics, but I am a bit concern that you are covering too much topics in this article. | ||
| + | *I would be a bit careful to draw in too many personal experiences. (Like you mention in the Summary) | ||
| + | *Maybe you can link to other articles in you text, for example where you talk about PERT charts. | ||
| + | *I also think you can make the paragraphs smaller, but I think this will fix it self when you get the diagrams in. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is a bit hard to comment on your structure when it is not completed, but so far it seems good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Responce to reviewer 1:== | ||
| + | Thank you for your feedback on this half made article. Good that you like the topic and that it feels interesting. It is important for me that the reader can focus on the information in the text and then look for the reference when the paragraph is done. I will add a complete reference list at the end of the article when it is finished. Nice that you like that I will put in some figures in the article. I feel that the text could be a bit heavy if there isn't a figure explaining the facts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like that you give me a comment on the amount of topics covered by the article. I will take that into consideration when continuing with the creation of the article. Maybe I should try to narrow it down and make it more specific to one or two topics and not go in to deep in each management approach. I will erase the personal part in the summery. Thank you for bringing it up, I agree that it is not appropriate and does not contribute to the article. Good idea with the linking to other articles, I will add that into mine. Thank you for your valuable feedback. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==S141931 Reviewer 2== | ||
| + | * As I can see, the article is not finished, however the topic sounds to be interesting and I would like to read it when it is done | ||
| + | * Writing language and style is of good quality, yet I do not think it is professional to mention personal relations to the topic | ||
| + | * Seems like you have a good framework of writing, you use the references, figures, and have a total contents of the article in mind, I believe it can become a good article when you finish it | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Responce to reviewer 2:== | ||
| + | Thank you for your positive feedback even though the article isn't finished. I will erase the personal part in the summary, thank you for pointing that out. I also appriciate that you made a comment on the finished article to be more likely a good article. I hope you are right. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:53, 29 September 2015
Mette: Looking forward to read more of your article when it is more completed.
KB1991, reviewer 3:
- I have an idea that the article isn’t completely finished yet ☺ But when looking at the structure of it and the headlines it looks good - Both the formatting and the read threat.
- Good that you have planned to implement figures to illustrate the text.
- There are a few mistakes where words have been swapped, like writing ‘with’ instead of ‘which’.
- Good that there are references to all the text – And looks like the sources is of good quality.
- Would have been nice to read more of the article ☺
Contents |
[edit] Responce to Reviewer 3:
You are correct about the article not being finished. It is important for me to know that the planned structure of the article is good and understandable for the reader, thank you for that feedback. I found the misstakes that you highlighted. I will have a careful lookthrough of the article as I'm coming to the end of finishing it. A complete reference list with correct wiki-style will be made at the end of the article, but good that the reader find the references reliable. Thank you for your feedback even though the article is far from finished.
[edit] S150801 Reviewer 1
The Benefits of Systems Engineering
[edit] Overall impression
I can see that you are not quite finished here yet. However, I am looking forward to read it when completed.
- I think it is an article with a good flow and easy to read.
- I like your consequent use where to put your references.
- And I think it is good that you are referring to illustrations in you text, I think this will make it easier to understand your points.
[edit] Rooms for improvement
- You are talking about many interesting topics, but I am a bit concern that you are covering too much topics in this article.
- I would be a bit careful to draw in too many personal experiences. (Like you mention in the Summary)
- Maybe you can link to other articles in you text, for example where you talk about PERT charts.
- I also think you can make the paragraphs smaller, but I think this will fix it self when you get the diagrams in.
It is a bit hard to comment on your structure when it is not completed, but so far it seems good.
[edit] Responce to reviewer 1:
Thank you for your feedback on this half made article. Good that you like the topic and that it feels interesting. It is important for me that the reader can focus on the information in the text and then look for the reference when the paragraph is done. I will add a complete reference list at the end of the article when it is finished. Nice that you like that I will put in some figures in the article. I feel that the text could be a bit heavy if there isn't a figure explaining the facts.
I like that you give me a comment on the amount of topics covered by the article. I will take that into consideration when continuing with the creation of the article. Maybe I should try to narrow it down and make it more specific to one or two topics and not go in to deep in each management approach. I will erase the personal part in the summery. Thank you for bringing it up, I agree that it is not appropriate and does not contribute to the article. Good idea with the linking to other articles, I will add that into mine. Thank you for your valuable feedback.
[edit] S141931 Reviewer 2
- As I can see, the article is not finished, however the topic sounds to be interesting and I would like to read it when it is done
- Writing language and style is of good quality, yet I do not think it is professional to mention personal relations to the topic
- Seems like you have a good framework of writing, you use the references, figures, and have a total contents of the article in mind, I believe it can become a good article when you finish it
[edit] Responce to reviewer 2:
Thank you for your positive feedback even though the article isn't finished. I will erase the personal part in the summary, thank you for pointing that out. I also appriciate that you made a comment on the finished article to be more likely a good article. I hope you are right.
