QUENSH

Revision as of 10:51, 18 June 2017

QUENSH (QUality, ENvironment, Safety and Health) systems are an extension of the formal QMS (Quality Management Systems, see also Total Quality Management (TQM)) in the means of health, safety and environmental conformance. The awareness of these issues has been increasingly growing throughout the past couple of decades, making the joint integration of all ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 management systems (also known as QUENSH). These standards, the common ways to integrate these and some typical points of critique and misunderstandings will be discussed throughout this article.

These systems can be set up using Microsoft Word or Excel documentation.

Sustainability concept

Normal QMS vs. QUENSH

Formal quality management systems (QMS) can be based off of four basic approaches:^[1]

• Inspection, or the reliance upon physically checking that work has been completed satisfactorily;
• Quality control (QC), or the reliance on management control techniques to achieve high levels of quality;
• Quality assurance (QA), or the use of externally accredited procedures to ensure that quality management practices are rigorously followed;
• Total quality management (TQM), or the motivation of continuous process improvement to achieve higher and higher levels of conformance to intention.

It is important to note that the formal QMS and QUENSH does not contradict one another, but that QUENSH can be seen as a further development in which the awareness of environment, safety and health is incorporated directly into the quality assessment agenda.

Standards behind QUENSH

All of the newest ISO standards follow the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle.

A common structure of standards for management systems, drawn up in 2012 and applicable to the new International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and future revisions of existing ISO standards. This structure leads to the concept of High Level Structures (HLS), in which certain aspects are met:^[2]

• Terminology, text, definitions, titles and the common sequence of the same
• Greater importance given the concept of risk

In particular, all management system standards present:

1. A structure made up of 10 principal points
2. Within each point there are some paragraphs and content, inclusion of which in all the standards is obligatory
3. Where necessary, the individual standards may add specific requirements in relation to their fields of application

Furthermore, and a key element of QUENSH, is the health and safety elements which may consist of the Occupational Health and Safety Assessment (OHSAS) series. This standard was adopted as a British standard by the British Standard Institution (BSI) back in 2008.^[3]

All of the newest ISO standards including ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle.^[4]

Management of quality: ISO 9001:2015

Common improvements in organizations caused by the usage of ISO 9000 maintenance.^[5]

The ISO 9000 series are based on seven Quality Management Principles (QMP).^[6] These are:

QMP 1: Customer focus

QMP 2: Leadership

QMP 3: Engagement of people

QMP 4: Process approach

QMP 5: Improvement

QMP 6: Evidence-base decision making

QMP 7: Relationship management

The ISO-series are being continually revised by standing technical committees and advisory groups, who receive feedback from those professionals who are implementing the standards. Different versions have been made in 1987, 1994, 2000, 2008 and latest 2015, in which the content is:

Section 1: Scope

Section 2: Normative references

Section 3: Terms and definitions

Section 4: Context of the organization

Section 5: Leadership

Section 6: Planning

Section 7: Support

Section 8: Operation

Section 9: Performance evaluation

Section 10: Improvement

Furthermore, the latest 2015 version is less prescriptive than its predecessors and focuses on performance, which was achieved by combining the process approach with risk-based thinking, and employing the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle at all levels in the organization.^[7]

Avoidance of environmental risks: ISO 14001

The ISO 14001 standard, which arguably is the most notable standard to the ISO 14000 series, sets out the criteria for an Environmental Management System (EMS). The ISO 14001 standard shares many common traits with its predecessor, ISO 9000. Just like ISO 9000 the ISO 14000 acts both as an internal management tool and as a way of demonstrating a company’s environmental commitment to its stakeholders including customers and clients.^[8] The standard, of which ISO 14001:2015 is the newest, is meant for to help organizations improve resource efficiency, reduce waste and reduce drive down cost.

Some environmental goals, possibly based on both environmental or economic incetives, can be:^[9]

• Cleaner technology
• Sustainable construction and construction environmental plans
• Emergency preparedness and response plans
• Green procurement
• Pollution risk assessments including drainage surveys, provision of spill containment and spill response equiment and biological cleaning products
• Producer responsibility obligations for products and waste
• Premises management including facility and energy reviews
• Waste management and minimisation
• Water and waste water management

Some of the main ideas behind the usage of QUENSH and the primary idea of the usage of ISO14000 is in the end to helps companies and organizations with the following, in addition to the potential of creating improved public relations and reduce production costs:^[9]

• Optimizing the use of raw materials, transport, water and energy
• Rationalising and recycling
• Reducing the volume and toxicity of waste, used water and air emissions.

Management of safety and health: OHSAS 18001

Costs in construction that the British International Standard (BIS) group think can be massively reduced by the introduction of proper international health and safety management systems.^[3]

The OHSAS 18000 series consists of two primary specifications; OHSAS 18001 and 18002, which provides requirements for an Occupational Safety and Health (OHS) management system and implementation guidelines, respectively.

The idea of the OHSAS is to help organizations to:

• Identify and control health and safety risks
• Reduce the potential for accidents
• Aid legal compliance
• Improve overall performance

A new international standard called ISO 45001 was meant to come out in 2016, ensuring a better link between all of the international standards. This new international standard was supposed to replace the current OHSAS 18001. ^[3] The publication date however has due to down voted drafts been postponed to 2018.^[10] The reasoning for this delay may be many, however a big concern for many global organizations in regards to developing such an international standard has been how it will affect and work with the current local regulations.^[3]

The appliance of QUENSH

Historically, many organizations start with the Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001, then add the environment management requirements from ISO 14001. Among other changes the OHSAS 18001 was updated back in July 2007 in order to be more easily aligned with the structures of the ISO 9000 and 14000 series. The change also stated greater emphasis on the “health” component of “health and safety”.^[11]

Furthermore, the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle model can be used by a wide range of organizations - from manufacturing facilities to service industries to government agencies. The newest changes of the ISO standards also makes it more possible for third party companies to sell/provide services for businesses wanting a greener or more sustainable profile.

Quality assurance

Visual presentation of the concept of six-sigma with the five steps of the DMAIC cycle at its core.

The quality control (QC) is the 'part of quality management focused on fulfilling quality requirements' .^[1] Many different kind of these tools are available, where as a few of them are mentioned here:^[1]

• Cause and effect diagrams, also known as Ishikawa diagrams or fishbone diagrams
• Performance measurement
• Statistical process control
• Value-stream mapping

The quality assurance (QA) systems specifies procedures for identification of conformance or non-conformance. In other words are the QA systems there to specify what inspections should take place using which criteria, and which QC tools should be used when. These QA systems are based on three basic types:^[1]

1. First-party systems, which are the responsibility of the company concerned alone.
2. Second-party systems, where suppliers are accredited by buyers using proprietary standards - common in defense procurement and the volume manufacturing sectors.
3. Third-party systems, where the QA system is certified by an independent third party.

One of the most widely diffused Project Improvement Projects (PIP) routines can arguably be the six-sigma with the DMAIC cycle at its core.^[1]

Environmental appliance

The applications that an organization may follow can be in the form of guidance and/or intructions. As mentioned, some third party companies make a living off of guiding existing companies in different industry sectors. The help they provide can e.g. consist of:^[9]

• Establishing environmental management systems, certifiable to BS EN ISO14401
• Environmental baseline reviews such as carbon footprint including reduction methods thereoff
• Legal compliance and risk assessment
• Training of the organizations employees such as terms of environmental awareness
• Communication strategies and campaigns

Different tools has been made in order to accomodate the desire of more green construction projects. An example of this is the tool called EcoProP developed by VTT Building Technology ^[12] comprised of several methods or so-called exhibits. An example of this is Exhibit 2: Environmental and Sustainability Issues in Construction, which is an approach and tool that can be used for almost any kind of building. The concept builds upon the environmental burdens during the operation of the building in addition to the traditional project boundaries consisting og cost, time and quality.^[12]

Exhibit 2: Environmental and Sustainability Issues in Construction^[12] is a great example of how the cost-quality-time triangle can be refined - in this case with aspects such as emissions, biodiversity, culutural heritage, etc.

Safety and health assurance

[Insert text here]

Limitations of QUENSH and the standards

Since the usage of ISOs has been more widely accepted on a global scale, some unavoidable debate regarding it has been made. The arguments against the criticism are often that the critics does not know how to set up a proper management system and make it run like a "well oiled" quality measurement system benefiting an organization for a long time.^[13] Furthermore, some will argue that the relatively high compliance cost of the organizations will be earned back through positive effects of the systems with a longer time span in focus.

The criticism that follows the standards are primarily mentioned as:^{[14] [15]}

• The compliance process is costly and time-consuming
• More administration is needed to implement it
• It is mostly relevant and applicable to manufacturing firms despite it striving to be as generic as possible
• It has some mandatory procedures that do not take the context of the organization and their activities into account
• No direct involvement of risk management
• Requirements about outsourced activities are not properly mentioned
• It too often relies on general principles

And as a more general criticism on the concept of international standards are also that organizations acquire it due to a marketplace requirement as opposed to actually understanding it. This may also be a product of the form being valued higher than actual results.^[15]

When it comes to inspection, QC and QA - and as such also QUENSH systems - all share two important limitations. They are all:^[1]

• ... first-order information loops around static standards, and
• ... systems that are operationally orientated; meaning that they do not take factors such as customer satisfaction into account.

Notes from lecture 4:

Safety and health: “The Danish/Scandinavian Model” > a lot of influence on the EU standards The Scandinavian model (tri-part system):

EU / government / ministry of employee

The Danish Working Environment Authority The Danish working Environment Council / Authority / The social partner

The National Research Centre for the Working Environment 11 Advisory boards - social partners Clinics for Occupational Environment Private advisors and consultants Universities Certification bureau

The reasoning for the 11 boards and other boards are that different parties need different information > The transport part needs other info than e.g. the constructional engineers

References

1. ↑ ^{1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5} Winch, Graham M. (2010). Managing construction projects. Chapter 12.
2. ↑ RINA Services. ISO Revision 2015: High Level Structures. http://www.rina.org/en/keytopics/iso-9001-and-iso-14001-revision/high-level-structure. Retrieved 7 June 2017
3. ↑ ^{3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3} British Standard Insitution (BSI) group. Whitepaper. https://www.bsigroup.com/LocalFiles/en-GB/iso-45001/Resources/BSI-ISO45001-Revision-Whitepaper-EN-UK.pdf. Retrieved 8 June 2017
4. ↑ Wikipedia. ISO 14000. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_14000. Retrieved 8 June 2017
5. ↑ Roslina Ab Wahid, James Corner (2009). Critical success factors and problems in ISO 9000 maintenance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 26 issue: 9, pp.881-893. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910995073. Retrieved 12 June 2017
6. ↑ International Standard Organization (ISO). Quality management principles. https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/pub100080.pdf. Retrieved 7 June 2017
7. ↑ International Standard Organization (ISO). ISO 9001:2015 - Just arrived!. https://www.iso.org/news/2015/09/Ref2002.html. ISO. Retrieved 7 June 2017
8. ↑ Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate Greening Through ISO 14001: A Rational Myth?. Organization Science. 18:127. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.1060.0224
9. ↑ ^{9.0 9.1 9.2} ecobusinesswm. QUENSH Consultancy. http://www.ecobusinesswm.co.uk/more/quensh-consultancy.aspx. Retrieved 9 June 2017
10. ↑ Wikipedia. ISO 45001. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_45001. Retrieved 9 June 2017
11. ↑ British Standards Institution (BSI). Press release July 2017: Health and safety management systems specification OHSAS 18001 is now a British Standard BS OHSAS 18001:2007. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/about-bsi/media-centre/press-releases/2007/7/Health-and-safety-management-systems-specification-OHSAS-18001-is-now-a-British-Standard-BS-OHSAS-18001-2007/
12. ↑ ^{12.0 12.1 12.2} VTT Building Technology (1998).Well-being through construction in Finland. Retrieved 11 June 2017
13. ↑ Robert Jasper. What are some common criticisms of ISO 9001? Quora forums. https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-common-criticisms-of-ISO-9001. Retrieved 12 June 2017
14. ↑ isoeasy. Criticisms of ISO 9000. Management Systems Inc forums. https://pdca.wordpress.com/2006/04/22/criticisms-of-iso-9000/. Required 12 June 2017
15. ↑ ^{15.0 15.1} Mark Nolan. What are some common criticisms of ISO 9001? Mark1systems. http://www.mark1systems.com/blog/quality/common-criticisms-iso-9001/. Retrieved 12 June 2017

Annotated Bibliography

PUT IN EVERY ISO AS FURTHER READING