Four Stages of Team Development

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Adjourning)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Category:Human Behaviour]]
 
[[Category:Human Behaviour]]
Team effectiveness is enhanced by a team's commitment to reflection and on-going evaluation. In addition to evaluating accomplishments in terms of meeting specific goals, for teams to be high-performing it is essential for them to understand their development as a team.
+
Self-managed work teams need considerable time to perform up to its true capabilities. What a group is capable of achieving depends in part on its stage of development. The team effectiveness can be improved if its members are committed to reflection and on-going evaluation. However, the most important aspect is that every team member understands their development as a team.
  
Teams go through stages of development. The most commonly used framework for a team's stages of development was developed in the mid-1960s by Bruce W. Tuckman, now a psychology professor at Ohio State University. Although many authors have written variations and enhancements to Tuckman's work, his descriptions of Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing provide a useful framework for looking at your own team.
+
Although every group’s development over time is unique, researchers have identified some stages of group development that many groups seem to pass through. The most famous model is the Four Stages of Team Development, developed by the psychology professor Bruce Tuckman in 1965. Tuckman suggested that all teams go through a relatively unproductive initial stage before becoming a self-reliant unit.
Each stage of team development has its own recognizable feelings and behaviours; understanding why things are happening in certain ways on your team can be an important part of the self-evaluation process.
+
  
The four stages are a helpful framework for recognizing a team's behavioural patterns; they are most useful as a basis for team conversation, rather than boxing the team into a "diagnosis". And just as human development is not always linear, team development is not always a linear process. Having a way to identify and understand causes for changes in the team behaviours can help the team maximize its process and its productivity.
+
Although there have been other written variations from other authors, Tuckman’s stages of development – Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing – are a helpful technique to recognize the team’s behaviour and feelings during the process. Identifying and understanding why changes occur is a key component of the self-evaluation process. This can help the team maximize its process and its productivity.
  
 
== Introduction to the Model ==
 
== Introduction to the Model ==

Revision as of 14:56, 14 November 2014

Self-managed work teams need considerable time to perform up to its true capabilities. What a group is capable of achieving depends in part on its stage of development. The team effectiveness can be improved if its members are committed to reflection and on-going evaluation. However, the most important aspect is that every team member understands their development as a team.

Although every group’s development over time is unique, researchers have identified some stages of group development that many groups seem to pass through. The most famous model is the Four Stages of Team Development, developed by the psychology professor Bruce Tuckman in 1965. Tuckman suggested that all teams go through a relatively unproductive initial stage before becoming a self-reliant unit.

Although there have been other written variations from other authors, Tuckman’s stages of development – Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing – are a helpful technique to recognize the team’s behaviour and feelings during the process. Identifying and understanding why changes occur is a key component of the self-evaluation process. This can help the team maximize its process and its productivity.

Contents

Introduction to the Model

Forming

Stage 1: Immature group

  • Confusion
  • Uncertainty
  • Assesing situation
  • Testing groung rules
  • Feeling out others
  • Defining goals
  • Getting acquainted
  • Establishing rules

Storming

Stage 2: Fractional group

  • Disagreement over priorities
  • Struggle for leadership
  • Tension
  • Hostility
  • Clique formation

Norming

Stage 3: Sharing group

  • Consensus
  • Leadership accepted
  • Trust established
  • Standards set
  • New stable roles
  • Co-operation

Performing

Stage 4: Effective group

  • Successful performance
  • Flexible, task roles
  • Openness
  • Helpfulness
  • Delusion, disillusion and acceptance

Further Development

Adjourning

Stage 5: Disbanding group

  • Disengagement
  • Anxiety about separation and ending
  • Positive feeling towards leader
  • Sadness
  • Self-evaluation
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox