Talk:Risk Quantification
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| The text sounds comprehensible and coherent |- |'''Language'''|| OK |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| No ...") |
(→Feedback on Abstract:) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article | |'''Purpose explanation'''|| Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''Title of the Wiki'''|| | + | |'''Title of the Wiki'''||Too broad, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article |
|- | |- | ||
|'''References'''|| | |'''References'''|| | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Other== | ==Other== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The abstract does not describe any particular method(s), in the case that the intention is to compare different methods that quantify risk the purpose and intention of the article should be expressed better in the abstract and at list the methods considered for the comparison. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Probably the title is initially too broad and need to be renamed in order to match the content of the article. | ||
Latest revision as of 14:48, 18 September 2017
[edit] Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity | The text sounds comprehensible and coherent |
| Language | OK |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | No description of any specific tool/theory/concept |
| Purpose explanation | Is there but not clear for the reader, try to reformulate by explaining the intention of the article |
| Title of the Wiki | Too broad, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article |
| References |
[edit] Other
The abstract does not describe any particular method(s), in the case that the intention is to compare different methods that quantify risk the purpose and intention of the article should be expressed better in the abstract and at list the methods considered for the comparison.
Probably the title is initially too broad and need to be renamed in order to match the content of the article.
