Talk:Project Performance Management Scorecard

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| The text sounds comprehesible |- |'''Language'''|| OK |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| OK |- |'''Purpose...")
 
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|'''Language'''|| OK  
 
|'''Language'''|| OK  
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| OK
+
|'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| OK, in an organizational context, no clear application for Portfolio, Program and Project management
 
|-
 
|-
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| OK, no clear application for Portfolio, Program and Project management
+
|'''Purpose explanation'''|| OK, no clear intention in Portfolio, Program and Project management context
 
|-
 
|-
 
|'''Title of the Wiki'''|| OK
 
|'''Title of the Wiki'''|| OK
Line 17: Line 17:
 
==Other==
 
==Other==
  
 +
The abstract mentions Financial, Customer, Internal business, Growth but does not explain the connection or relevance for managing Portfolio, Program or projects.
  
 
+
The abstract describe historical aspects that does not connect with any particular method or explain the purpose of the article, this descriptions could fit better in a history section.
The abstract describe too historical aspects that could fit better in history section.
+

Latest revision as of 18:33, 20 September 2017

[edit] Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity The text sounds comprehesible
Language OK
Description of the tool/theory/concept OK, in an organizational context, no clear application for Portfolio, Program and Project management
Purpose explanation OK, no clear intention in Portfolio, Program and Project management context
Title of the Wiki OK
References

[edit] Other

The abstract mentions Financial, Customer, Internal business, Growth but does not explain the connection or relevance for managing Portfolio, Program or projects.

The abstract describe historical aspects that does not connect with any particular method or explain the purpose of the article, this descriptions could fit better in a history section.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox