Talk:Managing multicultural teams
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== '''Text clarity''' Text is coherent '''Language''' Good '''Description of the tool/theory/concept''' Good and easy to follow, but how does thi...") |
(→Abstract Feedback) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
</ol> | </ol> | ||
− | '''References''' | + | '''References''' Okay, but try to find more references to mandatory list of references wherever appropriate |
'''Relevance of article''' It is relevant. Consider the following: | '''Relevance of article''' It is relevant. Consider the following: |
Revision as of 08:10, 14 February 2018
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good and easy to follow, but how does this relate to project/program/portfolio management rather than just organizational team management ("TEMO" style management) or day-to-day tasks at work? This should be emphasized and clarified in the abstract
Purpose explanation Good, but can be improved:
- Who is the reader? Project/Program/Portfolio Manager or Sponsor etc?
- What will the reader learn/get out of reading the article?
- Briefly describe the structure of the article in the abstract to set reader expectations
References Okay, but try to find more references to mandatory list of references wherever appropriate
Relevance of article It is relevant. Consider the following:
- Try to link it to a knowledge area of project management (if that is the direction) e.g. Project Human Resource Management
- Ensure depth of the article so it contributes to the project/program/portfolio management community more than a normal web search