Talk:Business Case

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Abstract Feedback)
(Feedback to first version of Wiki article)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article==
 
==Feedback to first version of Wiki article==
*Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
+
*'''Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?'''
*Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
+
**
*Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
+
*'''Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?'''
 +
**
 +
*'''Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?'''
 +
**

Revision as of 11:43, 17 February 2018

Abstract Feedback

Text clarity Text is coherent

Language Good

Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract

Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?

References Good

Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?

Feedback to first version of Wiki article

  • Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
  • Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
  • Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox