Talk:Business Case
(→Feedback to first version of Wiki article) |
(→Answer 3) |
||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
===Answer 3=== | ===Answer 3=== | ||
| − | + | The grammar and spelling are overall good and very readable, however, I found the following minor mistakes in the following sentences: | |
| + | *The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitiations. -> The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitations. | ||
| + | *The Business Case is evaluated through a cost benefit -> The Business Case is evaluated through a cost-benefit | ||
| + | *justification for undertaking a project, in terms of -> the justification for undertaking a project, in terms of | ||
| + | *the benefits, cost and risk of alternative options and rationale for -> the benefits, cost, and risk of alternative options and rationale f | ||
===Question 4 · TEXT=== | ===Question 4 · TEXT=== | ||
Revision as of 12:07, 17 February 2018
Contents |
Abstract Feedback
Text clarity Text is coherent
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good, consider elaborating the tools for making a business case mentioned in the abstract
Purpose explanation Good, but consider who your reader is - is the project manager? project sponsor?
References Good
Relevance of article Very relevant. Perhaps consider, when writing the article, expanding on what the governance is around who decides/approves a business case in a project management organization?
Feedback to first version of Wiki article
Note: since the article only contains abstract and headings, I will focus on what is there and recommendations for reading material. :)
- Grammar and spelling: Is the text readable and free of formal errors?
- The grammar and spelling are overall good and very readable, however, I found the following minor mistakes in the following sentences:
- The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitiations. -> The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitations.
- The Business Case is evaluated through a cost benefit -> The Business Case is evaluated through a cost-benefit
- justification for undertaking a project, in terms of -> the justification for undertaking a project, in terms of
- the benefits, cost and risk of alternative options and rationale for -> the benefits, cost, and risk of alternative options and rationale f
- The grammar and spelling are overall good and very readable, however, I found the following minor mistakes in the following sentences:
- Structure and logical flow: Is every part of the article informative and necessary to communicate the core message? What do you like? What should be improved, and how?
- Content: Is the article convincing? Is it complete? Is it relevant an “deep” enough? What parts do you like? What parts need to be improved?
Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Jonas
Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 1
Answer here
Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 2
Answer here
Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 3
The grammar and spelling are overall good and very readable, however, I found the following minor mistakes in the following sentences:
- The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitiations. -> The definitions of Business Case are discussed with its limitations.
- The Business Case is evaluated through a cost benefit -> The Business Case is evaluated through a cost-benefit
- justification for undertaking a project, in terms of -> the justification for undertaking a project, in terms of
- the benefits, cost and risk of alternative options and rationale for -> the benefits, cost, and risk of alternative options and rationale f
Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 4
Answer here
Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 5
Answer here
Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 6
Answer here
Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
Answer 7
Answer here
