Talk:Brainstorming as a risk identification method

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Abstract Feedback== Text Clarity; Ok. Language; Ok. References; Ok. In general the abstract is ok, when developing the article don't forget to to find relevant literature...")
 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
In general the abstract is ok, when developing the article don't forget to to find relevant literature and elaborate and describe the relevance for a Project Manager.
 
In general the abstract is ok, when developing the article don't forget to to find relevant literature and elaborate and describe the relevance for a Project Manager.
 +
 +
 +
 +
== Feedback 1 | Reviewer Name: Lorenz Sieferle ==
 +
 +
==Feedback 1 | Reviewer Name: Lorenz Sieferle==
 +
 +
===Question 1===
 +
 +
Quality of the summary:
 +
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 +
===Answer 1===
 +
 +
 +
 +
===Question 2===
 +
 +
Structure and logic of the article:
 +
 +
Is the argument clear?
 +
 +
Is there a logical flow to the article?
 +
 +
Does one part build upon the other?
 +
 +
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
===Answer 2===
 +
 +
 +
 +
===Question 3===
 +
 +
Grammar and style:
 +
 +
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
 +
 +
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
===Answer 3===
 +
 +
 +
===Question 4===
 +
 +
Figures and tables:
 +
 +
Are figures and tables clear?
 +
 +
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
===Answer 4===
 +
 +
 +
===Question 5===
 +
 +
Interest and relevance:
 +
 +
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
 +
 +
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
===Answer 5===
 +
 +
 +
===Question 6===
 +
 +
Depth of treatment:
 +
 +
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
 +
 +
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 +
===Answer 6===
 +
 +
 +
 +
===Question 7===
 +
 +
Annotated bibliography:
 +
 +
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
 +
 +
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
 +
 +
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
 +
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 +
===Answer 7===

Revision as of 23:15, 18 February 2018

Contents

Abstract Feedback

Text Clarity; Ok.

Language; Ok.

References; Ok.

In general the abstract is ok, when developing the article don't forget to to find relevant literature and elaborate and describe the relevance for a Project Manager.


Feedback 1 | Reviewer Name: Lorenz Sieferle

Feedback 1 | Reviewer Name: Lorenz Sieferle

Question 1

Quality of the summary:


What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 1

Question 2

Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 2

Question 3

Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 3

Question 4

Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 4

Question 5

Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 5

Question 6

Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 6

Question 7

Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 7

Retrieved from "http://wiki.doing-projects.org/index.php?title=Talk:Brainstorming_as_a_risk_identification_method&oldid=51114"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox