|
|
| (12 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Abstract==
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Note to TA ==
| |
| − | In order to explain the origin of the phenomenon, Programmification, linking to a wiki regarding Projectification would be relevant. However, nothing is written on Projectification yet.
| |
| − | Due to this situation, I'll shortly describe the origin of the expression, Projectification, in my wiki article in order to '''1.)''' have a reference point for my article/argumentation and '''2.)''' to give the reader an understanding of the 'current situation' from where the need for/interest in/tendency towards Programmification arose.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Note to self ==
| |
| − | Add the correct title when context to explorer Programmification within is decided. (= create a new wiki article by c/p content).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Introduction ==
| |
| − | Why is the phenomenon, Programmification, interstring to get a greater knowledge of? World changed into project driven economy 12-15 years ago, next natural step is programmification? (ref: Hayes Management of Change - internal cause to change (creativity, direction, delegation, coordination, collaboration)
| |
| − | If a word, a concept or a method is misinterpreted and institutionalized the great idea behind it can be compromised, the effect directly contradictory to the desired outcome or harmful to organizations.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Origin of the word ==
| |
| − | - explain the origin of the phenomenon, Programmification, starting by setting the scene with the origin of the expression, Projectification.
| |
| − | - providing some history on Programmification and Projectification e.g. including the first appearance in articles (year and context)
| |
| − | - Projectification (26.900 results on Google search 8th of February 2018)
| |
| − | - Programmification (1.880 results on Google search at 8th of February 2018)
| |
| − | - A short introduction to why 'ification' is added to words (dictionary: suffix meaning 'the process of becoming')
| |
| − | - correct meaning (diverging meaning of the word?)
| |
| − | - possible interpretations of the word (sounds like 'it is close to being X, but then not really'. Maybe seen some kind of plagiarism or a homemade version of X which is not really accepted as being totally OK' Not academic enough, a self-made practical light version. Or maybe seen like an 'over use' or 'shooting birds with cannonballs' syndrome)
| |
| − | - (Describe the tool, concept or theory and explain it's purpose. The section should reflect the current state of the art on the topic.)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Nice try, but no cigar ==
| |
| − | Misalignment with standards (The standard for program management http://proquestcombo.safaribooksonline.com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/9781933890524)
| |
| − | Explain why the expected outcome fails/is expected to fail by pointing out which elements or processes the programmification omits and the consequenses.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Theory ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Application ==
| |
| − | Provide guidance on how to use the tool/concept/theory and when it's applicable.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Limitations ==
| |
| − | Critically reflect on the tool/concept/theory. When possible, substantiate your claims with literature.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Recommendations ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Annotated bibliography ==
| |
| − | Provide key references (3-q9), where a reader can find additional information on the subject. Summarize and outline the relevance of each reference to the topic (around 100 words per reference). The bibliography is not counted in the suggested 3000 words target length of the article
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == References ==
| |
