Resource allocation and crashing
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Abstract pending") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Abstract | + | Chapters |
| + | |||
| + | Abstract | ||
| + | |||
| + | Common to all projects is the need to allocate available resources in the best possible manner. | ||
| + | If done correctly by the project manager, she can avoid delays, penalty fees and using unnecessarily many resources. In addition, by analyzing the possibility of crashing the project, the project manager might be able to find a more optimal solution than would be possible by the simple PERT/CPM analysis. Thus this analysis is building upon a PERT/CPM analysis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Resource loading | ||
| + | Resource leveling using ALAP heuristic | ||
| + | Resource scheduling | ||
| + | Cost-time trade off | ||
| + | Crashing | ||
| + | Advantages and disadvantages | ||
| + | Crash example | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 11 February 2019
Chapters
Abstract
Common to all projects is the need to allocate available resources in the best possible manner. If done correctly by the project manager, she can avoid delays, penalty fees and using unnecessarily many resources. In addition, by analyzing the possibility of crashing the project, the project manager might be able to find a more optimal solution than would be possible by the simple PERT/CPM analysis. Thus this analysis is building upon a PERT/CPM analysis.
Resource loading
Resource leveling using ALAP heuristic
Resource scheduling
Cost-time trade off
Crashing
Advantages and disadvantages
Crash example
