Talk:Stakeholders from a dynamic and network perspective
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(→Review by joh: new section) |
NobodyKnows (Talk | contribs) (→What is missing) |
||
| (24 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Could it be a good idea to pinpoint the different messages and recalling the problems which can appear? | * Could it be a good idea to pinpoint the different messages and recalling the problems which can appear? | ||
* List of typical failures of stakeholder analysis, could maybe be a good introduction and the need to create better awareness how to use the tool. | * List of typical failures of stakeholder analysis, could maybe be a good introduction and the need to create better awareness how to use the tool. | ||
| + | '''Answer: This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
=Overview of a Stakeholder Analysis= | =Overview of a Stakeholder Analysis= | ||
* Illustrations of on what levels a SA can be used | * Illustrations of on what levels a SA can be used | ||
| − | * Maybe also a process diagram or bullet points of the procedure | + | * Maybe also a process diagram or bullet points of the procedure |
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''The purpose of this article has not been to go into detail of a stakeholder analysis, where links have been created for other pages concerning these aspects of a stakeholder analysis.''' | ||
| + | * '''A stakeholder analsysis matrix has been inserted for illustrating, how the theory can be applied.''' | ||
=Current practices= | =Current practices= | ||
| Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
*What subgroups are their. | *What subgroups are their. | ||
*How to handle the different stakeholders? | *How to handle the different stakeholders? | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''The purpose of this article has not been to go into detail of a stakeholder analysis, where links have been created for other pages concerning these aspects of a stakeholder analysis.''' | ||
=What is missing= | =What is missing= | ||
| Line 25: | Line 31: | ||
* What is the reason that people are not using the SA during the project time? | * What is the reason that people are not using the SA during the project time? | ||
* Maybe investigate, what is needed to make it happen. Break routines, establish awareness, integrate in monthly meetings? | * Maybe investigate, what is needed to make it happen. Break routines, establish awareness, integrate in monthly meetings? | ||
| − | + | '''Answer:''' | |
| + | * '''This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
== Review by joh == | == Review by joh == | ||
| Line 34: | Line 41: | ||
* Your article is rather short, some concrete example on to do stakeholder analysis from the chosen perspective would be nice, and it would add some more content in the article | * Your article is rather short, some concrete example on to do stakeholder analysis from the chosen perspective would be nice, and it would add some more content in the article | ||
| − | * It might also be a good idea to clarify a little better if the topic is related to, either project, program or portfolio management or all of them. | + | '''Answer:''' |
| + | * '''It was very short at the time.''' | ||
| + | * It might also be a good idea to clarify a little better if the topic is related to, either project, program or portfolio management or all of them. | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''Primary project management has been used for examples.''' | ||
| + | |||
* Your content really needs some visualized support in the form of models, charts or tables; it would help much more on the general understanding. | * Your content really needs some visualized support in the form of models, charts or tables; it would help much more on the general understanding. | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''More illustration has been implemented.''' | ||
* Looks like references are present in the text in some kind of special form e.g [1, p.241], what does that mean? And where can I find the source? | * Looks like references are present in the text in some kind of special form e.g [1, p.241], what does that mean? And where can I find the source? | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''References have been corrected to a wiki style''' | ||
* References are missing in the bottom, but I’m assuming it is on its way. | * References are missing in the bottom, but I’m assuming it is on its way. | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''References have been inserted.''' | ||
* If you have not done so, I would recommend going through the slides from lecture 19 from slide 6, as inspiration to structure your article better, because it seems a little messy now and missing a logical flow. | * If you have not done so, I would recommend going through the slides from lecture 19 from slide 6, as inspiration to structure your article better, because it seems a little messy now and missing a logical flow. | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''This has been done, and mentioned in the overview that the article will take a critical perspective of a stakeholder analysis.''' | ||
=== Abstract === | === Abstract === | ||
| Line 44: | Line 64: | ||
* If the is as it should be, I would recommend reading through it a couple of times in making sure there is a more fluent transitions between each areas being addressed in this section. | * If the is as it should be, I would recommend reading through it a couple of times in making sure there is a more fluent transitions between each areas being addressed in this section. | ||
* You use a lot of “ “ e.g. “knowledge of the project”, “seniority”, “involvement of the project”. What does that mean? | * You use a lot of “ “ e.g. “knowledge of the project”, “seniority”, “involvement of the project”. What does that mean? | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | * '''This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
=== Overview of a stakeholder analysis today === | === Overview of a stakeholder analysis today === | ||
* A graphical overview would really be nice here. | * A graphical overview would really be nice here. | ||
| − | * You go quite quickly into something specific, I thought this section was supposed to provide an overview? | + | * You go quite quickly into something specific, I thought this section was supposed to provide an overview? |
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | *''' This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
=== Current practices, when conducting a stakeholder analysis === | === Current practices, when conducting a stakeholder analysis === | ||
* I guess this text goes to some kind of model? Would be nice to see it? | * I guess this text goes to some kind of model? Would be nice to see it? | ||
* Also a better transition from the overview of a stakeholder analysis today section to this section is recommended. As a reader, I don’t understand what is going on. | * Also a better transition from the overview of a stakeholder analysis today section to this section is recommended. As a reader, I don’t understand what is going on. | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | *''' This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
| + | * '''A stakeholder matrix has been inserted as an example.''' | ||
=== What is missing === | === What is missing === | ||
* Again, a transition to this section is missing. I’m lost? In which context are we talking? | * Again, a transition to this section is missing. I’m lost? In which context are we talking? | ||
* I think behavior is spelled behavior | * I think behavior is spelled behavior | ||
| + | '''Answer:''' | ||
| + | *''' This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.''' | ||
| + | * '''I concur: behavior is spelled behavior.''' | ||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 1 December 2014
Contents |
[edit] JEPO Review
[edit] General Comments
- To Short
- Not enough proper references
- Would be nice with some pictures of the different stakeholder diagrams
- Bullet point would make the reading a bit more easy and the main points of your article more visible
[edit] Abstract
- A long description of the over all topic. My be shorten it down to the different methods.
- Could it be a good idea to pinpoint the different messages and recalling the problems which can appear?
- List of typical failures of stakeholder analysis, could maybe be a good introduction and the need to create better awareness how to use the tool.
Answer: This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
[edit] Overview of a Stakeholder Analysis
- Illustrations of on what levels a SA can be used
- Maybe also a process diagram or bullet points of the procedure
Answer:
- The purpose of this article has not been to go into detail of a stakeholder analysis, where links have been created for other pages concerning these aspects of a stakeholder analysis.
- A stakeholder analsysis matrix has been inserted for illustrating, how the theory can be applied.
[edit] Current practices
- What question do you have to make to identify the stakeholders.
- What subgroups are their.
- How to handle the different stakeholders?
Answer:
- The purpose of this article has not been to go into detail of a stakeholder analysis, where links have been created for other pages concerning these aspects of a stakeholder analysis.
[edit] What is missing
- This could maybe be included in the abstract?
- What is the reason that people are not using the SA during the project time?
- Maybe investigate, what is needed to make it happen. Break routines, establish awareness, integrate in monthly meetings?
Answer:
- This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
[edit] Review by joh
[edit] General comments
Interesting topic, and seems relevant for project, program and portfolio management. Content wise it looks like you’re on the right path. Your writing skills also seems good, I don’t have any major comments in regards to the grammar or spelling. I’m assuming the article is still under development.
- Your article is rather short, some concrete example on to do stakeholder analysis from the chosen perspective would be nice, and it would add some more content in the article
Answer:
- It was very short at the time.
- It might also be a good idea to clarify a little better if the topic is related to, either project, program or portfolio management or all of them.
Answer:
- Primary project management has been used for examples.
- Your content really needs some visualized support in the form of models, charts or tables; it would help much more on the general understanding.
Answer:
- More illustration has been implemented.
- Looks like references are present in the text in some kind of special form e.g [1, p.241], what does that mean? And where can I find the source?
Answer:
- References have been corrected to a wiki style
- References are missing in the bottom, but I’m assuming it is on its way.
Answer:
- References have been inserted.
- If you have not done so, I would recommend going through the slides from lecture 19 from slide 6, as inspiration to structure your article better, because it seems a little messy now and missing a logical flow.
Answer:
- This has been done, and mentioned in the overview that the article will take a critical perspective of a stakeholder analysis.
[edit] Abstract
- There is a lot of text in the abstract, I would consider using some parts of the abstract else where in the article and boil it down in the abstract.
- If the is as it should be, I would recommend reading through it a couple of times in making sure there is a more fluent transitions between each areas being addressed in this section.
- You use a lot of “ “ e.g. “knowledge of the project”, “seniority”, “involvement of the project”. What does that mean?
Answer:
- This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
[edit] Overview of a stakeholder analysis today
- A graphical overview would really be nice here.
- You go quite quickly into something specific, I thought this section was supposed to provide an overview?
Answer:
- This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
[edit] Current practices, when conducting a stakeholder analysis
- I guess this text goes to some kind of model? Would be nice to see it?
- Also a better transition from the overview of a stakeholder analysis today section to this section is recommended. As a reader, I don’t understand what is going on.
Answer:
- This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
- A stakeholder matrix has been inserted as an example.
[edit] What is missing
- Again, a transition to this section is missing. I’m lost? In which context are we talking?
- I think behavior is spelled behavior
Answer:
- This has been taken into consideration and the whole section has been rewritten.
- I concur: behavior is spelled behavior.
