MCDM-APH method in decision making
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
|
|
| (150 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | | + | delete please |
| − | The MCDM-APH (Multi-Criteria Decision Making - Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a tool that makes complex decisions. MCDM is a systematic approach that evaluate conflicting criterias in decision making, one of these approaches is APH which uses a mathematic method to derive a relative importance of criteria in a decision problem.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The method was developed in the 1970s by Thomas Saaty <ref name="Saaty">Saaty, T. L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26, 1990. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037722179090057I </ref>, AHP is a mathematical method that is used to derive the relative importance of criteria in a decision problem. The idea behind the method is that a decision problem can be represented as a hierarchical structure, with the most important criteria at the top followed by the lesser important criteria at the bottom.
| + | |
| − | There are four steps involved in the AHP process, the first is to decide what the decision problem is and what the criteria are, the second step in the process is to identifying the criteria and put them in hierarchical structure where the most important is at the top followed by the lesser important criteria and the least important at the bottom, in the third step the relative importance of each criteria is decided this is used to pairwise compare all the criteria, the final step is to combine the criteria into a single overall decide.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Decision-making is at the core of project management and yet it can be a daunting task, especially when the projects are complex and multi-facted projects. The pressure of making decisions in a timely and informed manner can be compounded when the criteria for success is not defined clearly, At time like this it not unusual that project managers may feel overwhelmed and unable to determine the most important factors to consider. This is where the APH-decision-making method provides a systematic approach to this challenge. This approach is addressing the complexity of decision making by Segmenting the process into manageable chunks. By following these steps the project manager can get a obtain a holistic view of the project's key performance indicators and success factors.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == 2 ==
| + | |
| − | ==3.3.==
| + | |
| − | == 3 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == References ==
| + | |
| − | <references/>
| + | |
Latest revision as of 13:02, 7 April 2023
delete please
