Talk:Development phase of idea to project
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Reviewer 1: s113665= | =Reviewer 1: s113665= | ||
| − | + | * Very nice structure! Nice overview and easy accessibility. | |
| − | + | ** ''Thanks'' | |
| − | + | * Looks good with the graphics. | |
| − | + | * Language is kind of hard to understand. | |
| − | + | ** A few sentences should be rephrased. I would recommend having that in the back of your head when you’re proofreading it. | |
| − | + | ***'' I agree and changed some of the sentences when I reread it. | |
| − | + | * Minor spelling errors | |
| − | + | **''Tried to find and fix them'' | |
| − | + | * Missing words | |
| − | + | ** Such as ‘the’ and ‘it’ | |
| − | + | ***''I noticed couple section and added them'' | |
| − | + | * Punctuation (long sentences). | |
| − | + | ** Try splitting some of them up and perhaps rewrite a few of them. | |
| + | ***'' Also notice some hard to understand sentences and rewrited them'' | ||
| + | * The article seems a bit generic caused by the broad approach. | ||
| + | ** The limitation and conclusion may, however, help this issue on the right path, looking forward to revisit it! | ||
| + | ***'' I tried to make more sense to them now'' | ||
| + | * Even though you basically use the method recommended, I have a hard time follow the ‘red-line’ through the current article (related to the bullet point above). | ||
| + | ** Perhaps write a ‘sub-conclusion’ within each chapter of the current article, to relate that given chapter to the main subject. | ||
| + | ***'' I changed some of the chapters to make it more understandable'' | ||
A single proofread and adding of the ‘red-line’ throughout the article will make it a nice and well-defined article! …Of course you need to finish it as well... ☺ happy writing and read you later! | A single proofread and adding of the ‘red-line’ throughout the article will make it a nice and well-defined article! …Of course you need to finish it as well... ☺ happy writing and read you later! | ||
| + | ''Thank you for helpful and good comments :) | ||
=Reviewer 2: S141543= | =Reviewer 2: S141543= | ||
* This is an interesting idea to write about | * This is an interesting idea to write about | ||
| + | ** ''Nice that you like it | ||
* I do not understand what sentence two in the abstract means, possibly it should be re-written | * I do not understand what sentence two in the abstract means, possibly it should be re-written | ||
| + | ** ''I agree it was badly made, now it is changed'' | ||
* Otherwise, the abstract looks good to me | * Otherwise, the abstract looks good to me | ||
| + | **''Thanks'' | ||
* Project management chapter seems to be more about a specific project than the concept of project management | * Project management chapter seems to be more about a specific project than the concept of project management | ||
| + | **'' I modified it to make it more clear | ||
* The planning section is well done in my opinion | * The planning section is well done in my opinion | ||
| + | **''Ok'' | ||
* Could come up with an example of a decision that has to be made in the decision making phase. | * Could come up with an example of a decision that has to be made in the decision making phase. | ||
* The article needs references | * The article needs references | ||
| + | **''Added them'' | ||
* The word structure in the article is a little confusing at times | * The word structure in the article is a little confusing at times | ||
| + | **'' I changed then and tried to make it better | ||
* I do realize that this article is a work in progress | * I do realize that this article is a work in progress | ||
| + | **'' It was :)'' | ||
=Reviewer 3: Lea= | =Reviewer 3: Lea= | ||
*You are following the method article. Unfortunately, I am not able to follow the thread of your article. I am not sure if you are done writing yet, but in my opinion there has to be a higher focus on where you want to lead the reader. | *You are following the method article. Unfortunately, I am not able to follow the thread of your article. I am not sure if you are done writing yet, but in my opinion there has to be a higher focus on where you want to lead the reader. | ||
| + | **'' I have made changes now'' | ||
*The subject sounds interesting and it applies to the course. As mentioned above the structure could hace more precision and guidance in order for the article to have more meaning. | *The subject sounds interesting and it applies to the course. As mentioned above the structure could hace more precision and guidance in order for the article to have more meaning. | ||
*Grammar is good. Some sentences are too long for me (personally) to read. Maybe split some of the sentences to let the reader understand the text better. | *Grammar is good. Some sentences are too long for me (personally) to read. Maybe split some of the sentences to let the reader understand the text better. | ||
| + | **'' I agree and changed some of the sentences. | ||
*The figures you have used correspond to the text and make sense. | *The figures you have used correspond to the text and make sense. | ||
| + | **''Ok'' | ||
*Concerning the length, you are on a good way, but there is still room left to fill around 3000 words. | *Concerning the length, you are on a good way, but there is still room left to fill around 3000 words. | ||
| − | *The abstract has a good length but does not give clarity about the article. Maybe try to explain the table of contents to the reader. | + | **'' I have added length on it'' |
| + | *The abstract has a good length but does not give clarity about the article. Maybe try to explain the table of contents to the reader. | ||
| + | ** '' I made minor changes to that but not much'' | ||
*Sources and Annotated bibliography: Up to now there are no sources. Make sure to add sources in order to avoid plagiarism. | *Sources and Annotated bibliography: Up to now there are no sources. Make sure to add sources in order to avoid plagiarism. | ||
| + | **'' Those have been added'' | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 29 September 2015
Mette: I like this topic, however, I suggest to focus on a specific area, otherwise, your article may end up a bit generic, and not as interesting as it could be because it is too broad. So think about tools for fine-tune ideas for projects and then pick one you can really go into details with.
[edit] Reviewer 1: s113665
- Very nice structure! Nice overview and easy accessibility.
- Thanks
- Looks good with the graphics.
- Language is kind of hard to understand.
- A few sentences should be rephrased. I would recommend having that in the back of your head when you’re proofreading it.
- I agree and changed some of the sentences when I reread it.
- A few sentences should be rephrased. I would recommend having that in the back of your head when you’re proofreading it.
- Minor spelling errors
- Tried to find and fix them
- Missing words
- Such as ‘the’ and ‘it’
- I noticed couple section and added them
- Such as ‘the’ and ‘it’
- Punctuation (long sentences).
- Try splitting some of them up and perhaps rewrite a few of them.
- Also notice some hard to understand sentences and rewrited them
- Try splitting some of them up and perhaps rewrite a few of them.
- The article seems a bit generic caused by the broad approach.
- The limitation and conclusion may, however, help this issue on the right path, looking forward to revisit it!
- I tried to make more sense to them now
- The limitation and conclusion may, however, help this issue on the right path, looking forward to revisit it!
- Even though you basically use the method recommended, I have a hard time follow the ‘red-line’ through the current article (related to the bullet point above).
- Perhaps write a ‘sub-conclusion’ within each chapter of the current article, to relate that given chapter to the main subject.
- I changed some of the chapters to make it more understandable
- Perhaps write a ‘sub-conclusion’ within each chapter of the current article, to relate that given chapter to the main subject.
A single proofread and adding of the ‘red-line’ throughout the article will make it a nice and well-defined article! …Of course you need to finish it as well... ☺ happy writing and read you later!
Thank you for helpful and good comments :)
[edit] Reviewer 2: S141543
- This is an interesting idea to write about
- Nice that you like it
- I do not understand what sentence two in the abstract means, possibly it should be re-written
- I agree it was badly made, now it is changed
- Otherwise, the abstract looks good to me
- Thanks
- Project management chapter seems to be more about a specific project than the concept of project management
- I modified it to make it more clear
- The planning section is well done in my opinion
- Ok
- Could come up with an example of a decision that has to be made in the decision making phase.
- The article needs references
- Added them
- The word structure in the article is a little confusing at times
- I changed then and tried to make it better
- I do realize that this article is a work in progress
- It was :)
[edit] Reviewer 3: Lea
- You are following the method article. Unfortunately, I am not able to follow the thread of your article. I am not sure if you are done writing yet, but in my opinion there has to be a higher focus on where you want to lead the reader.
- I have made changes now
- The subject sounds interesting and it applies to the course. As mentioned above the structure could hace more precision and guidance in order for the article to have more meaning.
- Grammar is good. Some sentences are too long for me (personally) to read. Maybe split some of the sentences to let the reader understand the text better.
- I agree and changed some of the sentences.
- The figures you have used correspond to the text and make sense.
- Ok
- Concerning the length, you are on a good way, but there is still room left to fill around 3000 words.
- I have added length on it
- The abstract has a good length but does not give clarity about the article. Maybe try to explain the table of contents to the reader.
- I made minor changes to that but not much
- Sources and Annotated bibliography: Up to now there are no sources. Make sure to add sources in order to avoid plagiarism.
- Those have been added
