Successful Teamwork

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(References)
(Team attributes)
 
(146 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
  
Effective teamwork is an essential component of organizational success, especially in projects. This wiki article provides an overview of the characteristics and elements that contribute to successful teamwork and explores the benefits, challenges, and strategies for building and maintaining effective teams.
+
This wiki article provides a comprehensive overview of successful teamwork. It is crucial especially for project managers to understand the importance of teamwork for companies, as successful teamwork not only benefits the performance of a team or a project but also improves employee satisfaction and happiness. So it is essential to know about the factors that affect the success of teams.
  
Successful teamwork is characterized by clear goals, open communication, trust among team members, and a shared commitment to achieving the team's objectives. These elements are crucial for effective collaboration, and they allow team members to leverage their diverse skills and expertise for problem-solving, decision-making, and innovation. When teams work well together, they can achieve more significant results than individuals working alone.
+
After a brief introduction about the definition of teams, this article dives into individual attributes, interpersonal attributes and team attributes that are enhancing teamwork. The individual attributes are factors that each individual should bring, they include Individual willingness, Individual competencies, Positive attitude and mindset, Openness to feedback, and Accountability. The interpersonal attributes are characteristics of interactions between the team members: Relationships, Trust, Respect, Collaboration and Cooperation, and Cohesion. And finally the team attributes are elements that are linked to the team as a whole. These are Common goal, Team composition, Common values, and Clear roles and work distribution. The article describes these attributes to emphasize the importance of understanding each facette of a successful team.
  
However, successful teamwork is not always easy to achieve and maintain. Challenges such as interpersonal conflicts, a lack of resources, and unclear roles and responsibilities can hinder the team's progress and impact its overall effectiveness. To overcome these challenges, team leaders and managers must establish a supportive team environment, foster open communication and feedback, and provide opportunities for professional development and team building activities.
+
Finally the article provide a literature research about a common uses model that describes factors of successful teamwork in a different way.
  
The benefits of successful teamwork are numerous and include increased productivity, improved problem-solving, and better job satisfaction. When team members work well together, they can achieve higher levels of performance, improve their interpersonal relationships, and experience greater job satisfaction. Furthermore, successful teamwork can have positive effects on organizational culture and lead to improved organizational outcomes.
+
== Importance of Teamwork and its benefits ==
  
In summary, effective teamwork is critical for organizational success, and this article provides valuable insights and tools for promoting successful teamwork. By understanding the characteristics and elements of effective teams, the benefits of successful teamwork, the challenges to teamwork, and the strategies for building and maintaining effective teams, managers and team leaders can develop and support high-performing teams that achieve their goals and contribute to the success of projects.
 
  
== Importance of Teamwork ==
+
Teamwork plays an important role in many aspects of our lives. Research shows that teamwork can improve the performance and the outcomes in a lot of diferent areas, for instance, the workplace, education, and in sports. In the workplace, effective teamwork can improve organizational performance, increase job satisfaction, and reduce employee turnovers. Additionally, teamwork is very important to achieving learning goals and developing the skills that are needed to succeed in the job. Cooperative learning activities in school can increase student engagement, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Likewise, teamwork in sports can improve the team performance drastically and even improve individual performance such as communication or the interpersonal performances like better cohesion among the team members.
  
Teamwork plays a major role in many part s of our lives. It is important for success in school, in training and at work. Especially for organisations and companies it has a lot of benefits and is often even fundamental. One of the most significant benefits of teamwork is that it creates a collective ownership of a project or task. When individuals work together as a team, they become invested in the success of the team. This leads to a sense of shared responsibility and accountability. This collective ownership also creates synergy, which is the combined effort of all team members. Synergy is essential for teams to achieve their goals as it leverages everyone's work and skills to produce something greater than any individual could achieve on their own.
+
Teamwork is especially important to organizational success because it increases productivity, quality and innovation, it encourages creativity and it improves problem-solving skills. It refers to individuals working together toward a common goal, putting their resources, skills, knowledges, and experiences together, resulting in greater efficiency and better decision-making.  
When comparing a team with the work of individuals, a team can solve problems better, is more productive and comes up with more innovative ideas.
+
This also means better decision making, greater employee engagement, improved accountability and happier employees.
+
Especially in today's rapidly changing and complex world, teamwork is essential for organizations to succeed. The ability to adapt quickly to new challenges and opportunities is critical, and teamwork is one of the most effective ways to achieve this adaptability. By working together, teams can increase their speed, improve their adaptability to change, and enhance their resilience.
+
  
In addition, teamwork can also potentially improve empowerment and diverse perspectives of the individuals. Teams that work well together can create a supportive and collaborative environment that promotes individual growth and development. By embracing diverse perspectives and ideas, teams can create new and innovative solutions to complex problems.
+
When it comes to innovative projects, the quality of teamwork is an important indicatior for the success of thr projects. That makes teamwork a vital factor in organizations. Project management success depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of the project team, so teamwork plays a major role in project, portfolio, and program management.  
Teamwork makes people communicate better and makes the being more open and honest and work together. So it is an advantage on the organisational level such as on the individual level .
+
  
In the field o project management teamwork is significantly important as well. Projects are usually executed by groups or teams, so it is vital for the project managers to know about the importance of good and successful teamwork. The project managers need to make sure that everybody trust each other and is communicating well so the team can work together towards the projects goal. By understanding the factors of successful teams and successful teamwork, project manager can ensure to create the perfecto environment and condition to get the most efficient results from the project.
+
With time teams have become more complex and dynamic, and success requires new and innovative ways to lead, communicate and collaborate: In today's rapidly changing work environment, traditional team research and practice may no longer be sufficient, so teamwork is essential for organizations to adapt and evolve and remain competitive in today's workplace. Therefore, it is very important to create a positive team environment that increases the team performance.
  
 
== Definition of a "Team" ==
 
== Definition of a "Team" ==
  
To understand the factors of successful teams and successful teamwork it is important to know what  the definition of a team is.  
+
In order to understand the importance of teamwork it is first necessary to clarify the definition of a team, because not all groups are necessarily a team.
  
- What is a team?  next step: to be able to understand the success of teams we have to differentiate between the characteristics of a successful team  
+
A team is a group of multiple individuals who come together to achieve a common and shared goal. The team members may have complementary and interdependent skills and maybe even hierarchical positions. The team is structured in a task-oriented manner, meaning clear tasks are assigned and it has a clear focus on achieving the shared goals. They work collaboratively and communicate both within and outside the team to accomplish their objectives and goals. Teamwork requires a certain level of team identity, which is different from individual identities, meaning that the members stand for what they are doing. This can be seen as an emotional bond to the team and among the team members and it is often considered as a crucial aspect of a team that distinguishes it from a group. This emotional bond is characterized by strong relationships, a sense of community, and a high level of group cohesion.
  
In the literature you can find a lot of different definitions of a "Team" but some o
+
Successful team collaboration also involves the distribution of work based on different areas of expertise, a specific role allocation, and an increasing sense of belonging among team members. The motivation to work as a team and the opportunity to combine different ideas and experiences can lead to a higher quality of overall team performance, which can surpass the cumulative individual performances.
  
distinguish from work groups such as committees and task forces
+
The definition of a team and the indicators for successful teamwork often overlap, so a precise definition is difficult to make. Some of these characteristics of a team are also indicators for the success of the team.
 
+
a team is a group of at least two people with complementary skills who depend on each other to achieve a common goal. A certain team identity must also exist, separate from the individual identities of team members. Teams are goal-oriented, communicate internally and externally, and are structured with various areas of expertise and hierarchical levels. There is a high degree of emotional interdependence and cohesion among team members, leading to a greater interest in the collective rather than individual goals. Other key characteristics of teams include flexibility, motivation, and the potential for innovation and creativity. While there is no single, universally accepted definition of a team, the essential characteristics of a team include multiple people, a shared goal, identification, division of labor, specific roles, and emotional bonding.
+
 
+
A team is a group of at least two individuals who complement each other's skills and depend on each other to achieve a common goal. A certain team identity must exist, which differs from individual identities. The team is structured in a goal- and task-oriented way and communicates internally and externally. A team usually consists of members with different areas of expertise and hierarchical levels. The emotional aspect of a team is characterized by intense mutual relationships, a strong sense of community, and cohesion among members. The flexibility of a team regarding emerging problems and the motivation gain that can arise in a team are additional advantages of this working form. The connection of the respective ideas and experiences of the members can lead to a total performance to which no one alone is capable.
+
 
+
== Characteristics of successful teams ==
+
 
+
- Team composition: Diversity
+
 
+
- Relationships
+
 
+
- Openness to feedback
+
 
+
- Individual willingness: to learn and adapt and deliver
+
 
+
- Individual competences
+
 
+
- Positive attitude and mindset
+
 
+
- Common values and culture
+
 
+
- identification and emotional bond
+
  
 
== Elements of successful teamwork ==
 
== Elements of successful teamwork ==
 +
When it comes to teamwork it is very important to understand the factors that influence the success of the teamwork. Especially in project management, it is crucial for the manager to understand how to make the team's performance as efficient as possible. Indicators for successful teamwork can be divided into three categories: '''Individual attributes''',  '''Interpersonal attributes''', and  '''Team attributes'''. Individual attributes are characteristics that each team member should have. For a project manager, these could be criteria for choosing people in their group. The interpersonal attributes explain how team members interact with each other, which is of course a crucial part of the performance of a team. If individuals can't work well together the team performance suffers. The team attributes describe the characteristics of the team as a whole and not the individuals and these attributes are very specific for each case.
  
- Communication
+
===Individual attributes===
  
- Trust
+
'''Individual willingness'''
  
- Respect
+
The willingness of individual team members to collaborate, contribute their best efforts, learn and adapt is a critical factor in for the succes of a team. Even with all the necessary skills, knowledge, resources and experiences, a lack of willingness can prevent a team from being efficient. This willingness is vital for creating an environment of trust among each other, openness, and cooperation that encoiurages teamwork. When team members are willing to communicate openly, share knowledge and experience, take on additional responsibilities, and be proactive, they can inspire others to do the same. That leads to a higher level of engagement and especially commitment, and in the end it leads to higher performance. In contrast, a lack of willingness can hinder a team to achieve its goals and undermine its success.
  
- clear roles
+
'''Individual competencies'''
  
- common goal: clearly defined
+
Individual competencies are essential for a team's success. They can be divided into technical, soft, and leadership competencies. Technical competencies are the skills, experience, and knowledge of each member in their own specification or field. These are necessary to achieve the team's objectives. Soft competencies such as communication or problem-solving are important for successful collaboration. Each team member brings unique competencies that can contribute to the team's overall performance. Strong soft competencies help avoid conflicts, communicate better, and work collaboratively towards a shared goal. Finally the leadership competencies can guide the team towards its objectives, manage conflicts, and create a positive work environment that encourges innovation and creativity.
  
- Accountability
+
'''Positive attitude and mindset'''
  
- Collaboration and cooperation
+
Having a positive attitude and a positive mindset is another factor for a team's success. It can foster trust, communication, collaboration, and creativity among the team members which leads to a more positive work environment. Positive attitudes increase motivation on the one hand and reduce stress on the other hand. Maintaining a positive mindset also means that individuals learn from mistakes, accept a certain vulnerability, and that they are open to constructive criticism. Finally a positive work environment, attitude and mindset can increase productivity, promote innovation, and ultimately help the team achieve its comon goals.
  
- work distribution: in areas of expertises
+
'''Openness to feedback'''
  
== The IPO-Model ==
+
Another essential factor for the success of teams is being receptive to feedback. Implementing and especially acknowledging feedback can improve the communication and build up trust among the team members. Through continuous feedback a continuous growth can be achieved. The ability to receive feedback with an open mind and willingness to learn from the feedback can enhance a team's capabilities to solve problems and increase the chances of achieving shared objectives. In contrast, a lack of openness to feedback can lead to conflict, mistrust, and an overall negative work environment. Teams that appreciate feedback and create a safespace for constructive criticism can improve team performance and achieve better outcomes.
  
 +
'''Accountability'''
  
[[File: IPO_Model.png.jpg|300px||thumb|Figure 1. The IPO model.]]
+
The success of a team is also depended on the accountability of the team members. Each team member should take responsibility for their role in achieving the team's goals. Accountability requires individuals to be reliable, honest, and committed to do their jobs. When team members are accountable, they are willing to acknowledge mistakes and learn from them. They hold themselves accountable for their actions and don't blame others for their own mistakes. For an effective accountability a clear communication and clear expectations are necessary. Ultimately, individual accountability creates an environment of trust and respect which enhances the team's overall performance.
  
In der Literatur findet man zahlreiche Input-Prozess-Output-Modelle (Siehe Abbildung 3), die beschreiben, welche Faktoren wie einen Einfluss auf die Leistung eines Teams haben. Sie unterteilen die Teamarbeit in drei Kategorien:
+
===Interpersonal attributes===
Der Input besteht aus Variablen, die die Voraussetzungen für die Teamarbeit sind. Sie begünstigen im besten Fall eine erfolgreiche Teamarbeit, aber können sich auch negativ auf die Teamarbeit auswirken. Auf jeden Fall sind sie ein begrenzender Faktor für den (Team-)Prozess.  Der (Team-)Prozess beschreibt den Vorgang, welcher die Input-Variablen zu einem Ergebnis transformiert. Dabei handelt es sich also wie der Name schon sagt, um den Prozess, der im Team stattfindet und zu einem Ergebnis führt. Das Ergebnis der Teamarbeit bildet der Output. Dabei wird sowohl das Ergebnis auf Leis-tungsebene, meistens ein materielles Produkt, als auch die immateriellen Ergebnisse auf Ebene der Gruppenmoral und der persönlichen Entwicklungen betrachtet.  Die Grund-idee dieses Modells ist es, dass das Ergebnis der Teamarbeit nicht unmittelbar durch die Input-Variablen bestimmt wird, sondern diese durch den Prozess umgewandelt werden. Einige Modellvarianten heißen daher auch Input-Mediator-Output-Modell.
+
Das IPO-Modell nach Hackmann und Morris (H&M) unterteilt den Input in individuel-le, Gruppen- und Umweltfaktoren. Die individuellen und Gruppenfaktoren sind in dem Modell nach Dick und West (D&W) als Gruppenzusammensetzung, beziehungsweise in dem Modell nach Högl und Gemünden (H&G) als Teambesetzung betitelt. Es handelt sich dabei zum einen um Eigenschaften, welche die einzelnen Mitglieder mit sich bringen, wie zum Beispiel soziale Kompetenz, methodische Kompetenz, Präferenz für Teamarbeit und Ausbildung und Background. Zum anderen sind Eigenschaften der Gruppe gemeint wie Gruppengröße, Homogenität im Wissensstand oder Heterogenität untereinander. Letzteres bezieht sich beispielsweise auf das Alter, auf die Religion oder auf die Bildung, da so unterschiedliche Erfahrungen und unterschiedliches Knowhow zu einer Lösungs-findung beigetragen werden kann. Ein weiterer wichtiger Faktor für die Zusammenset-zung des Teams ist nach H&G die Teamführung und alle damit verbundenen Eigenschaf-ten, auf welche im Rahmen dieser Arbeit allerdings nicht genauer eingegangen wird. Die Umweltfaktoren stellen äußere Einflüsse dar, wie zum Beispiel in dem Modell nach D&W der kulturelle und organisationale Kontext, in dem das Team arbeitet.
+
Der (Team-)Prozess besteht nach H&M aus der Interaktion zwischen den Mitgliedern. Folgende Faktoren sind dafür laut H&G und von D&W von Bedeutung: Kommunikation, Aufgabenkoordination, Ausgewogenheit der Beiträge (bzw. Minderheiteneinfluss), ge-genseitige Unterstützung, Arbeitsnormen, Kohäsion (und Identifikation), Partizipation, Autonomie und Entscheidungsfindung.
+
Als Output bekommt man zum einen leistungsbezogene Ergebnisse, welche sich durch Effektivität, Effizienz und Quantität charakterisieren lassen. Die Effektivität beschreibt, in welchem Maße das Ziel erreicht wurde. Man kann es also mit Qualität gleichsetzen.  Zum anderen bekommt man Ergebnisse, die sich auf die Teammoral und auf persönlichen Entwicklungen während der Teamarbeit beziehen: Geht man davon aus, dass die Zusam-menarbeit im Team nicht nur auf einmal beschränkt ist, sind Faktoren, die auf das Poten-zial für zukünftige Zusammenarbeit Auswirkung haben, weitere wichtige, immaterielle Ergebnisse, die im Output zu berücksichtigen sind. Diese sind nach H&G persönlicher Lernerfolg und Zufriedenheit. D&W fügen noch die Team-Lebendigkeit hinzu.
+
  
== Benefits of successful teamwork ==
 
  
- Improved productivity and efficiency
+
'''Relationships'''
  
- Higher job satisfaction
+
When team members build strong relationships, they are more likely to comunicate better, trust each another more, and collaborate better. Good relationships between team members makes them enjoying the time together which results in a positive work environment and increase job satisfaction, which can then improve team productivity and overall the success. Attributes like trust and respect are correlated to the relationships.
  
- Increased creativity and innovation
 
  
- Stronger relationships and moral
+
'''Communication''''
  
- Better problem-solving and decision-making
+
The better the communication, the more successful a teamwork is. The ability to provide ideas and information clearly, listen actively and process the information helps teams work more efficiently and make better decisions.
 +
A failure in the communication can cause complete failure of a team. The communication can vary between team members. Some combination of individuals might have a good communication while others can have a bad communication between each other. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and delays in completing tasks. Therefore, it is important for team members to establish clear communication channels and protocols.
  
== Challenges to successful teamwork ==
+
'''Trust'''
  
- Communication barriers
+
Trusting each other helps team members work effectively together, which leads to better results. Trust correlates strongly with the relationship among the team members. Teams which trust each other are more likely to share knowledge, give honest fedback, and work collaboratively towards the same goals. This is very important when it comes to decision making processes, where trust is needed for open and honest communication. Trust is also important in creating a positve team dynamic, where team members have their safe zone and feel secure in their relationships to each other. Without trust, teams might struggle to work effectively and miss their goals. Therefore, trust building strategies should be a priority for any team looking to improve their performance.
  
- Conflict and disagreements
 
  
- Lack of trust or respect
+
'''Respect'''
  
- Inadequate resources
+
Respect is like trust, correlated with the relationship among the team members and it is another very important factor for the success of teamwork. It enables the individuals to listen and acknowledge each others ideas and perspectives and fosters a sense of inclusion. Teams that have a culture o respect create an environment where everybody feels safe to express their opinions, to take risks, and to make mistakes without the fear of getting blamed. Such an environment encourages creativity and innovation, which then lead to a higher team performance.
  
- Poor leadership
+
'''Collaboration and cooperation'''
  
== Strategies for building/maintaining successful teamwork ==
+
Collaboration and Cooperation are as well essential for successfull teamwork. The collaboration and cooperation can be affected by previous mentioned attributes. Collaboration means workingtogtether to achieve your own goals while collaboration means working together towards the same goal. In terms of teams collaborations is often the right term, but also cooperation within a team can happen, for example if individuals hamve their own goals apart of the common shared goal. Without collaboration or cooperation the team members would work individually and not together, which decreases the productivity.
  
- Team building activities
+
'''Cohesion'''
  
- Effective leadership
+
Cohesion is the unity and the mutual support among team members. This attribute as well is correlated to the relationship among the team members. HIgher cohesion results in more motivating team members, so its linked to higher levels of team performance, job satisfaction, and commitment. Cohesion can be archieved through different ways, like team-building activities or developing a sense of belongingness among team members. Although it is important to mention, that high cohesion can also be a obstacle in some situations, as it can lead to group thinking and a resistance to change. Therefore, project maangers should try to find a balance between promoting cohesion and encouraging constructive dissent and diverse perspectives.
  
- Training and development
+
===Team attributes===
  
- Conflict resolution strategies
+
'''Common goal'''
  
 +
As already mentioned in the definition of a team, a common goal is essential for successful teamwork. It provides the direction and especially the purpose for the team. When team members share a common vision, each person is motivated and committed individually archive it. The team's common goal should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and the scope should be clear. Without a clear common goal, team members may have different priorities and work in different directions, which can lead to confusion and hinder the performance of the team.
  
team coaching!!!!!!
 
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A Theory of Team Coaching. Academy of Management
 
  
 +
'''Team composition'''
  
==The forming–storming–norming–performing model==
+
The composition of a team is a important factor for successful teamwork. The composition of the team must be aligned with the different tasks, ensuring that the right people are in the right positions. Diverse backgrounds and experiences of the individuals can bring different perspectives and ideas which enhaces the creativity and problem-solving abilities of the team. On the other hand too different personalities can be an obstacle because they could have very different working styles which could result in conflicts. It is important to find the right balance and make ensure a positive team atmosphere. Therefore, carefully considering the team composition can lead to a more effective and successful team.
  
tuckmann
+
'''Common values'''
  
 +
When team members share the same values, it creates a sense of unity and it leads to a positiv work environment. Comon values help team members to work towards a common goal which makes it easier to make decisions and solve problems as a team. Sharing the same values also leads to higher trust in each other and higher motivation. Teams that have clearly defined and shared values are probably more likely to be successful in achieving their goals.
  
== Examples of successful teamwork ==
+
'''Identification and emotional bond'''
  
- Sports teams
+
Identification with the team and emotional bond to the team are another important attribute for the success of a team. When team members identify with their team and feel emotionally attached to their team, they are more motivated, more committed and more loyal to their teams. This leads to higher performance of the team. The emotional bond is something that can be build up with time and shared experiences.
  
- Business teams
+
'''Clear roles and work distribution'''
  
- Educational teams
+
To clarify the roles in a team and to distribute the work task makes a team more successful as well. Well defined roles mean clear responsibilities for different tasks and people, and the team members know exactly what is expected of them. By a fair work distribution it can be ensured, that each member is contributing to the success. In contrast, no roles or no work distribution could lead to confusion and inefficient performance, since the same people might do the same tasks.
  
- Community service teams
+
== The IPO-Model ==
 
+
- Military teams
+
 
+
== References ==
+
 
+
<references>
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management (10th ed.). Wiley
+
Tuckman, Bruce (Spring 2001). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups'. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal. 63 (6), 71–72.
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
Patrick Lencioni (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass
+
 
+
George Barna. The Power of Team Leadership
+
 
+
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management (10th ed.). Wiley
+
 
+
General Stanley McChrystal. Team of Teams: New Rules of Engagement for a Complex World
+
 
+
Dawna Markova and Angie McArthur. Collaborative Intelligence: Thinking with People Who Think Differently
+
 
+
 
+
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). "A Theory of Team Coaching. Academy of Management"
+
 
+
Jon R. Katzenbach & Douglas K. Smith. The Discipline of Teams
+
 
+
Becker, J. H. & Pastoors, S. & Ebert, H. (2017). Praxishandbuch berufliche Schlüsselkompetenzen. 50 Handlungskompetenzen für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf (1. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
+
 
+
Bornemann, S (2012). Kooperation und Kollaboration. Das Kreative Feld als Weg zu innovativer Teamarbeit (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
+
 
+
Burba, M. (2018). Erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. Analyse der Projektmeetings bei einem Automobilhersteller (1. Aufl.). Springer
+
 
+
Hoegl, G. & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science 12 (4), 435-449
+
 
+
Lippmann, E. & Pfister, A. & Urs, J. (2019). Handbuch Angewandte Psychologie für Führungskräfte. Führungskompetenzen und Führungswissen (5. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
+
 
+
Mathieu, J. & Maynard, M.T. & Rapp T. & Gilson L. (2008). Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancementes and a Glimpse Into the Future. Jour-nal of Management, 34 (3), 410-476
+
  
  
The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization by Jon R. Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith
+
[[File:IPO-modell.png|right|thumb|500px|Figure 1: IPO model. Click for a clearer picture. <ref name=IPO> ''https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8753''</ref> ]]
  
 +
The Input-Process-Output (IPO) model is a commonly used model in the literature to understand the factors that influence the success and the performance of teams. The model dviides team work into three categories: Input, Process, and Output. The Input category are variables that are preconditions for the teamwork. These variables can either make successful teamwork easier or hinder it. But they are always a limiting factor for the team process. The team proces refers to the process that transforms the input variables into a result. This process takes places within the team, leading to a specific outcome. The outcome or output is the result of the teamwork and it includes material outcomes that are measurable based on the objectives, and non physical results such as group moral or personal developement.
  
Milner, H. (1992). International Theories of Cooperation among Nations: Strenghts and Weaknesses. World Politics, 44 (3), 466-496
+
In the literature can be mainly found three IPO models: Hackmann and Morris model, Dick and West's model and Högl and Gemünden's model.
  
Nerdinger, F. W. & Blickle, g. & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
+
The IPO model, developed by Hackmann and Morris, divides input into individual, group, and environmental factors. The individual and group factors are described as group composition in the model by Dick and West, and as team composition in the model by Högl and Gemünden. These factors include characteristics that individulaa members bring to the team, such as social and technical competence, preference for teamwork, and education and background, as well as group characteristics such as group size, homogenity of knowledge, and heterogeneity among members. The t
 +
heterogenity refers, for example, to the age, the religion, or the education, because diversity in experiences and knowledge can contribute to the solution finding process. Environmental factors represent external influences, such as the cultural and organizational context in which the team works in Dick and West's model.
  
Pastoors, S. & Ebert, H. (2019). Psychologische Grundlagen zwischenmenschlicher Kooperation. Bedeutung von Vertrauen für langfristig erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit (1. Aufl.). Springer
+
The process, according to Hackmann and Morris and Dick and West, consists of interaction between members. The following factors are relevant to this process: communication, task coordination, balance of contributions, mutual support, work norms, cohesion, participation, autonomy, and decision making. The output consists of performance related results, characterized by effectiveness, efficiency, and quantity. Effectiveness describes the extent to which the goal has been archieved and can be equated with quality. Additionally, results related to team moral and personal development during teamwork are considered. Assuming that teamwork is not limited to one project, non physical  factors that affect the potential for future collaboration are also important. These include personal learning and satisfaction or team vitality.
  
 +
<ref name=Mathieu />
 +
<ref name=Lippmann />
 +
<ref name=Burba />
  
  
Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press.
+
== Annotated bibliography==
  
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2003). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Press.
+
*Barkley, E., Major, C., & Cross, P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques (2nd ed.). Wiley. <ref name=Barkley> Barkley, E., Major, C., & Cross, P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques (2nd ed.). Wiley. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). ''https://www.perlego.com/book/999446/collaborative-learning-techniques-a-handbook-for-college-faculty-pdf''</ref>
  
Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2016). Fundamentals of Management. Pearson Education.
+
*Becker, J. H., Pastoors, S., & Ebert, H. (2017). Praxishandbuch berufliche Schlüsselkompetenzen. 50 Handlungskompetenzen für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf (1. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg  <ref name=Becker> Becker, J. H., Pastoors, S., & Ebert, H. (2017). Praxishandbuch berufliche Schlüsselkompetenzen. 50 Handlungskompetenzen für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf (1. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). ''https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-54925-4''</ref>
  
Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A., & Millett, B. (2019). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education Limited.
+
*Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail (3rd edition). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann <ref name=Belbin> Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail (3rd edition). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''http://196.43.128.20/xmlui/handle/20.500.12383/1061?show=full''</ref>
  
DuBrin, Andrew J. (2015). Essentials of Management. Cengage Learning.
+
*Bornemann, S. (2012). Kooperation und Kollaboration. Das Kreative Feld als Weg zu innovativer Teamarbeit (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften <ref name=Bornemann> Bornemann, S. (2012). Kooperation und Kollaboration. Das Kreative Feld als Weg zu innovativer Teamarbeit (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. (Accessed: November 2020). ''https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-531-19179-9''</ref>
  
6.0 6.1 Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail. Butterworth-Heinemann
+
*Burba, M. (2018). Erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. Analyse der Projektmeetings bei einem Automobilhersteller (1. Aufl.). Springer <ref name=Burba> Burba, M. (2018). Erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. Analyse der Projektmeetings bei einem Automobilhersteller (1. Aufl.). Springer. (Accessed: November 2020). ''https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-19829-9''</ref>
  
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399.
+
*DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Essentials of Management (10th edition). South-Western Cengage Learning <ref name=DuBrin> DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Essentials of Management (10th edition). South-Western Cengage Learning. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://studydaddy.com/attachment/137689/epdfpub_essentials-of-management-ninth-edition.pdf''</ref>
  
R. B. Woodring, R. A. Boies, and C. A. Johnson. (2004). The impact of team diversity on team outcomes: A field study. Small Group Research 35, no. 3: 365-398.
+
*Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press <ref name=Hackmann_book> Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). ''https://www.perlego.com/book/837329/leading-teams-setting-the-stage-for-great-performances-pdf ''</ref>
  
Blank, C. (2018). Team Building Exercises That Actually Work. Harvard Business Review.
+
*Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287
 +
*Hoegl, G., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449 <ref name=Hoegl> Hoegl, G., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228365985_Teamwork_Quality_and_the_Success_of_Innovative_Projects_A_Theoretical_Concept_and_Empirical_Evidence''</ref>
  
O'Grady, S., & Malloch, M. (2010). The effective small group: Communication and teamwork (Custom). Cengage Learning.
+
*Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard business review, 83(7/8), 162-171 <ref name=Katzenbach_Paper> Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard business review, 83(7/8), 162-171. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5893c76059cc68f6efd5355a/t/58a4f6cb6a4963c71a7f0084/1487206107130/The+Discipline+of+Teams.pdf''</ref>
  
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem solving. Charles Scribner's Sons.
+
*Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press <ref name=Katzenbach_Book> Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press. (Accessed: April .2023). ''https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/58945eff8040e5ab45038d77''</ref>
  
Barkley, Cross, and Major (2014) titled "Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty.
+
*Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, 12th edition. <ref name=Kerzner> Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, 12th edition. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). ''https://www.perlego.com/book/3236853/project-management-a-systems-approach-to-planning-scheduling-and-controlling-pdf'' </ref>
  
Wright, T., & Craig, T. (2011). Teamwork in sport: A theoretical and integrative review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4(1), 146-170. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2010.535932
+
*Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass. <ref name=Lencioni> Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://www.academia.edu/39178542/The_Five_Dysfunctions_of_aTeam_Patrick_Lencioni'' </ref>
  
Kluger, J. (1995). Apollo 13: How Failure Became NASA's Finest Hour. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
+
*Lippmann, E., Pfister, A., & Urs, J. (2019). Handbuch Angewandte Psychologie für Führungskräfte. Führungskompetenzen und Führungswissen (5. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. <ref name=Lippmann> Lippmann, E., Pfister, A., & Urs, J. (2019). Handbuch Angewandte Psychologie für Führungskräfte. Führungskompetenzen und Führungswissen (5. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). ''https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-55810-2''</ref>
  
Kellner, T. (2019). What we can learn from the US women's soccer team's management style. CNBC.
+
*Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476. <ref name=Mathieu> Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF5181/h15/articles-teamwork/mathieu_etal_2008_team-effectiveness-1997_2007_a_review_of_advancements_and_a_glimpse_into_the_future.pdf''</ref>
  
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The discipline of teams. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 111-120.
+
*Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg <ref name=Nerdinger> Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). ''https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4''</ref>
  
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, 45-99.
+
*Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Prentice Hall. <ref name=Robbins> Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Prentice Hall. (Accessed: April .2023). ''https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/589460498040e5ab4504b03f''</ref>
  
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36(5), 555-599.
+
*Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36(5), 555-599. <ref name=Salas> Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36(5), 555-599. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220041354_Is_there_a_Big_Five_in_Teamwork''</ref>
  
Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2-24.
+
*Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2-24. <ref name=Tannenbaum> Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2-24. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology/article/teams-are-changing-are-research-and-practice-evolving-fast-enough/6D811E1C7B16B12A14C403E720F3C2C3''</ref>
  
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
+
*Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399 <ref name=Tuckman> Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). ''https://sci-hub.se/10.1037/h0022100'' </ref>
  
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822-832.
+
== References==
 +
<references />

Latest revision as of 22:51, 9 May 2023

Contents

[edit] Abstract

This wiki article provides a comprehensive overview of successful teamwork. It is crucial especially for project managers to understand the importance of teamwork for companies, as successful teamwork not only benefits the performance of a team or a project but also improves employee satisfaction and happiness. So it is essential to know about the factors that affect the success of teams.

After a brief introduction about the definition of teams, this article dives into individual attributes, interpersonal attributes and team attributes that are enhancing teamwork. The individual attributes are factors that each individual should bring, they include Individual willingness, Individual competencies, Positive attitude and mindset, Openness to feedback, and Accountability. The interpersonal attributes are characteristics of interactions between the team members: Relationships, Trust, Respect, Collaboration and Cooperation, and Cohesion. And finally the team attributes are elements that are linked to the team as a whole. These are Common goal, Team composition, Common values, and Clear roles and work distribution. The article describes these attributes to emphasize the importance of understanding each facette of a successful team.

Finally the article provide a literature research about a common uses model that describes factors of successful teamwork in a different way.

[edit] Importance of Teamwork and its benefits

Teamwork plays an important role in many aspects of our lives. Research shows that teamwork can improve the performance and the outcomes in a lot of diferent areas, for instance, the workplace, education, and in sports. In the workplace, effective teamwork can improve organizational performance, increase job satisfaction, and reduce employee turnovers. Additionally, teamwork is very important to achieving learning goals and developing the skills that are needed to succeed in the job. Cooperative learning activities in school can increase student engagement, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills. Likewise, teamwork in sports can improve the team performance drastically and even improve individual performance such as communication or the interpersonal performances like better cohesion among the team members.

Teamwork is especially important to organizational success because it increases productivity, quality and innovation, it encourages creativity and it improves problem-solving skills. It refers to individuals working together toward a common goal, putting their resources, skills, knowledges, and experiences together, resulting in greater efficiency and better decision-making.

When it comes to innovative projects, the quality of teamwork is an important indicatior for the success of thr projects. That makes teamwork a vital factor in organizations. Project management success depends on the effectiveness and efficiency of the project team, so teamwork plays a major role in project, portfolio, and program management.

With time teams have become more complex and dynamic, and success requires new and innovative ways to lead, communicate and collaborate: In today's rapidly changing work environment, traditional team research and practice may no longer be sufficient, so teamwork is essential for organizations to adapt and evolve and remain competitive in today's workplace. Therefore, it is very important to create a positive team environment that increases the team performance.

[edit] Definition of a "Team"

In order to understand the importance of teamwork it is first necessary to clarify the definition of a team, because not all groups are necessarily a team.

A team is a group of multiple individuals who come together to achieve a common and shared goal. The team members may have complementary and interdependent skills and maybe even hierarchical positions. The team is structured in a task-oriented manner, meaning clear tasks are assigned and it has a clear focus on achieving the shared goals. They work collaboratively and communicate both within and outside the team to accomplish their objectives and goals. Teamwork requires a certain level of team identity, which is different from individual identities, meaning that the members stand for what they are doing. This can be seen as an emotional bond to the team and among the team members and it is often considered as a crucial aspect of a team that distinguishes it from a group. This emotional bond is characterized by strong relationships, a sense of community, and a high level of group cohesion.

Successful team collaboration also involves the distribution of work based on different areas of expertise, a specific role allocation, and an increasing sense of belonging among team members. The motivation to work as a team and the opportunity to combine different ideas and experiences can lead to a higher quality of overall team performance, which can surpass the cumulative individual performances.

The definition of a team and the indicators for successful teamwork often overlap, so a precise definition is difficult to make. Some of these characteristics of a team are also indicators for the success of the team.

[edit] Elements of successful teamwork

When it comes to teamwork it is very important to understand the factors that influence the success of the teamwork. Especially in project management, it is crucial for the manager to understand how to make the team's performance as efficient as possible. Indicators for successful teamwork can be divided into three categories: Individual attributes, Interpersonal attributes, and Team attributes. Individual attributes are characteristics that each team member should have. For a project manager, these could be criteria for choosing people in their group. The interpersonal attributes explain how team members interact with each other, which is of course a crucial part of the performance of a team. If individuals can't work well together the team performance suffers. The team attributes describe the characteristics of the team as a whole and not the individuals and these attributes are very specific for each case.

[edit] Individual attributes

Individual willingness

The willingness of individual team members to collaborate, contribute their best efforts, learn and adapt is a critical factor in for the succes of a team. Even with all the necessary skills, knowledge, resources and experiences, a lack of willingness can prevent a team from being efficient. This willingness is vital for creating an environment of trust among each other, openness, and cooperation that encoiurages teamwork. When team members are willing to communicate openly, share knowledge and experience, take on additional responsibilities, and be proactive, they can inspire others to do the same. That leads to a higher level of engagement and especially commitment, and in the end it leads to higher performance. In contrast, a lack of willingness can hinder a team to achieve its goals and undermine its success.

Individual competencies

Individual competencies are essential for a team's success. They can be divided into technical, soft, and leadership competencies. Technical competencies are the skills, experience, and knowledge of each member in their own specification or field. These are necessary to achieve the team's objectives. Soft competencies such as communication or problem-solving are important for successful collaboration. Each team member brings unique competencies that can contribute to the team's overall performance. Strong soft competencies help avoid conflicts, communicate better, and work collaboratively towards a shared goal. Finally the leadership competencies can guide the team towards its objectives, manage conflicts, and create a positive work environment that encourges innovation and creativity.

Positive attitude and mindset

Having a positive attitude and a positive mindset is another factor for a team's success. It can foster trust, communication, collaboration, and creativity among the team members which leads to a more positive work environment. Positive attitudes increase motivation on the one hand and reduce stress on the other hand. Maintaining a positive mindset also means that individuals learn from mistakes, accept a certain vulnerability, and that they are open to constructive criticism. Finally a positive work environment, attitude and mindset can increase productivity, promote innovation, and ultimately help the team achieve its comon goals.

Openness to feedback

Another essential factor for the success of teams is being receptive to feedback. Implementing and especially acknowledging feedback can improve the communication and build up trust among the team members. Through continuous feedback a continuous growth can be achieved. The ability to receive feedback with an open mind and willingness to learn from the feedback can enhance a team's capabilities to solve problems and increase the chances of achieving shared objectives. In contrast, a lack of openness to feedback can lead to conflict, mistrust, and an overall negative work environment. Teams that appreciate feedback and create a safespace for constructive criticism can improve team performance and achieve better outcomes.

Accountability

The success of a team is also depended on the accountability of the team members. Each team member should take responsibility for their role in achieving the team's goals. Accountability requires individuals to be reliable, honest, and committed to do their jobs. When team members are accountable, they are willing to acknowledge mistakes and learn from them. They hold themselves accountable for their actions and don't blame others for their own mistakes. For an effective accountability a clear communication and clear expectations are necessary. Ultimately, individual accountability creates an environment of trust and respect which enhances the team's overall performance.

[edit] Interpersonal attributes

Relationships

When team members build strong relationships, they are more likely to comunicate better, trust each another more, and collaborate better. Good relationships between team members makes them enjoying the time together which results in a positive work environment and increase job satisfaction, which can then improve team productivity and overall the success. Attributes like trust and respect are correlated to the relationships.


Communication'

The better the communication, the more successful a teamwork is. The ability to provide ideas and information clearly, listen actively and process the information helps teams work more efficiently and make better decisions. A failure in the communication can cause complete failure of a team. The communication can vary between team members. Some combination of individuals might have a good communication while others can have a bad communication between each other. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and delays in completing tasks. Therefore, it is important for team members to establish clear communication channels and protocols.

Trust

Trusting each other helps team members work effectively together, which leads to better results. Trust correlates strongly with the relationship among the team members. Teams which trust each other are more likely to share knowledge, give honest fedback, and work collaboratively towards the same goals. This is very important when it comes to decision making processes, where trust is needed for open and honest communication. Trust is also important in creating a positve team dynamic, where team members have their safe zone and feel secure in their relationships to each other. Without trust, teams might struggle to work effectively and miss their goals. Therefore, trust building strategies should be a priority for any team looking to improve their performance.


Respect

Respect is like trust, correlated with the relationship among the team members and it is another very important factor for the success of teamwork. It enables the individuals to listen and acknowledge each others ideas and perspectives and fosters a sense of inclusion. Teams that have a culture o respect create an environment where everybody feels safe to express their opinions, to take risks, and to make mistakes without the fear of getting blamed. Such an environment encourages creativity and innovation, which then lead to a higher team performance.

Collaboration and cooperation

Collaboration and Cooperation are as well essential for successfull teamwork. The collaboration and cooperation can be affected by previous mentioned attributes. Collaboration means workingtogtether to achieve your own goals while collaboration means working together towards the same goal. In terms of teams collaborations is often the right term, but also cooperation within a team can happen, for example if individuals hamve their own goals apart of the common shared goal. Without collaboration or cooperation the team members would work individually and not together, which decreases the productivity.

Cohesion

Cohesion is the unity and the mutual support among team members. This attribute as well is correlated to the relationship among the team members. HIgher cohesion results in more motivating team members, so its linked to higher levels of team performance, job satisfaction, and commitment. Cohesion can be archieved through different ways, like team-building activities or developing a sense of belongingness among team members. Although it is important to mention, that high cohesion can also be a obstacle in some situations, as it can lead to group thinking and a resistance to change. Therefore, project maangers should try to find a balance between promoting cohesion and encouraging constructive dissent and diverse perspectives.

[edit] Team attributes

Common goal

As already mentioned in the definition of a team, a common goal is essential for successful teamwork. It provides the direction and especially the purpose for the team. When team members share a common vision, each person is motivated and committed individually archive it. The team's common goal should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and the scope should be clear. Without a clear common goal, team members may have different priorities and work in different directions, which can lead to confusion and hinder the performance of the team.


Team composition

The composition of a team is a important factor for successful teamwork. The composition of the team must be aligned with the different tasks, ensuring that the right people are in the right positions. Diverse backgrounds and experiences of the individuals can bring different perspectives and ideas which enhaces the creativity and problem-solving abilities of the team. On the other hand too different personalities can be an obstacle because they could have very different working styles which could result in conflicts. It is important to find the right balance and make ensure a positive team atmosphere. Therefore, carefully considering the team composition can lead to a more effective and successful team.

Common values

When team members share the same values, it creates a sense of unity and it leads to a positiv work environment. Comon values help team members to work towards a common goal which makes it easier to make decisions and solve problems as a team. Sharing the same values also leads to higher trust in each other and higher motivation. Teams that have clearly defined and shared values are probably more likely to be successful in achieving their goals.

Identification and emotional bond

Identification with the team and emotional bond to the team are another important attribute for the success of a team. When team members identify with their team and feel emotionally attached to their team, they are more motivated, more committed and more loyal to their teams. This leads to higher performance of the team. The emotional bond is something that can be build up with time and shared experiences.

Clear roles and work distribution

To clarify the roles in a team and to distribute the work task makes a team more successful as well. Well defined roles mean clear responsibilities for different tasks and people, and the team members know exactly what is expected of them. By a fair work distribution it can be ensured, that each member is contributing to the success. In contrast, no roles or no work distribution could lead to confusion and inefficient performance, since the same people might do the same tasks.

[edit] The IPO-Model

Figure 1: IPO model. Click for a clearer picture. [1]

The Input-Process-Output (IPO) model is a commonly used model in the literature to understand the factors that influence the success and the performance of teams. The model dviides team work into three categories: Input, Process, and Output. The Input category are variables that are preconditions for the teamwork. These variables can either make successful teamwork easier or hinder it. But they are always a limiting factor for the team process. The team proces refers to the process that transforms the input variables into a result. This process takes places within the team, leading to a specific outcome. The outcome or output is the result of the teamwork and it includes material outcomes that are measurable based on the objectives, and non physical results such as group moral or personal developement.

In the literature can be mainly found three IPO models: Hackmann and Morris model, Dick and West's model and Högl and Gemünden's model.

The IPO model, developed by Hackmann and Morris, divides input into individual, group, and environmental factors. The individual and group factors are described as group composition in the model by Dick and West, and as team composition in the model by Högl and Gemünden. These factors include characteristics that individulaa members bring to the team, such as social and technical competence, preference for teamwork, and education and background, as well as group characteristics such as group size, homogenity of knowledge, and heterogeneity among members. The t heterogenity refers, for example, to the age, the religion, or the education, because diversity in experiences and knowledge can contribute to the solution finding process. Environmental factors represent external influences, such as the cultural and organizational context in which the team works in Dick and West's model.

The process, according to Hackmann and Morris and Dick and West, consists of interaction between members. The following factors are relevant to this process: communication, task coordination, balance of contributions, mutual support, work norms, cohesion, participation, autonomy, and decision making. The output consists of performance related results, characterized by effectiveness, efficiency, and quantity. Effectiveness describes the extent to which the goal has been archieved and can be equated with quality. Additionally, results related to team moral and personal development during teamwork are considered. Assuming that teamwork is not limited to one project, non physical factors that affect the potential for future collaboration are also important. These include personal learning and satisfaction or team vitality.

[2] [3] [4]


[edit] Annotated bibliography

  • Barkley, E., Major, C., & Cross, P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques (2nd ed.). Wiley. [5]
  • Becker, J. H., Pastoors, S., & Ebert, H. (2017). Praxishandbuch berufliche Schlüsselkompetenzen. 50 Handlungskompetenzen für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf (1. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg [6]
  • Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail (3rd edition). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann [7]
  • Bornemann, S. (2012). Kooperation und Kollaboration. Das Kreative Feld als Weg zu innovativer Teamarbeit (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften [8]
  • Burba, M. (2018). Erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. Analyse der Projektmeetings bei einem Automobilhersteller (1. Aufl.). Springer [4]
  • DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Essentials of Management (10th edition). South-Western Cengage Learning [9]
  • Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press [10]
  • Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 269-287
  • Hoegl, G., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449 [11]
  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard business review, 83(7/8), 162-171 [12]
  • Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press [13]
  • Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, 12th edition. [14]
  • Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass. [15]
  • Lippmann, E., Pfister, A., & Urs, J. (2019). Handbuch Angewandte Psychologie für Führungskräfte. Führungskompetenzen und Führungswissen (5. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. [3]
  • Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476. [2]
  • Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg [16]
  • Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Prentice Hall. [17]
  • Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36(5), 555-599. [18]
  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2-24. [19]
  • Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399 [20]

[edit] References

  1. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8753
  2. 2.0 2.1 Mathieu, J. E., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410-476. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF5181/h15/articles-teamwork/mathieu_etal_2008_team-effectiveness-1997_2007_a_review_of_advancements_and_a_glimpse_into_the_future.pdf
  3. 3.0 3.1 Lippmann, E., Pfister, A., & Urs, J. (2019). Handbuch Angewandte Psychologie für Führungskräfte. Führungskompetenzen und Führungswissen (5. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-55810-2
  4. 4.0 4.1 Burba, M. (2018). Erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit in Projektteams. Analyse der Projektmeetings bei einem Automobilhersteller (1. Aufl.). Springer. (Accessed: November 2020). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-19829-9
  5. Barkley, E., Major, C., & Cross, P. (2014). Collaborative Learning Techniques (2nd ed.). Wiley. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). https://www.perlego.com/book/999446/collaborative-learning-techniques-a-handbook-for-college-faculty-pdf
  6. Becker, J. H., Pastoors, S., & Ebert, H. (2017). Praxishandbuch berufliche Schlüsselkompetenzen. 50 Handlungskompetenzen für Ausbildung, Studium und Beruf (1. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-662-54925-4
  7. Belbin, R. M. (2010). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail (3rd edition). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). http://196.43.128.20/xmlui/handle/20.500.12383/1061?show=full
  8. Bornemann, S. (2012). Kooperation und Kollaboration. Das Kreative Feld als Weg zu innovativer Teamarbeit (1. Aufl.). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. (Accessed: November 2020). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-531-19179-9
  9. DuBrin, A. J. (2010). Essentials of Management (10th edition). South-Western Cengage Learning. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://studydaddy.com/attachment/137689/epdfpub_essentials-of-management-ninth-edition.pdf
  10. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Harvard Business Press. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). https://www.perlego.com/book/837329/leading-teams-setting-the-stage-for-great-performances-pdf
  11. Hoegl, G., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435-449. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228365985_Teamwork_Quality_and_the_Success_of_Innovative_Projects_A_Theoretical_Concept_and_Empirical_Evidence
  12. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (2005). The discipline of teams. Harvard business review, 83(7/8), 162-171. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5893c76059cc68f6efd5355a/t/58a4f6cb6a4963c71a7f0084/1487206107130/The+Discipline+of+Teams.pdf
  13. Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Harvard Business School Press. (Accessed: April .2023). https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/58945eff8040e5ab45038d77
  14. Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, 12th edition. (Accessed: 24.04.2023). https://www.perlego.com/book/3236853/project-management-a-systems-approach-to-planning-scheduling-and-controlling-pdf
  15. Lencioni, P. (2002). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team. Jossey-Bass. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://www.academia.edu/39178542/The_Five_Dysfunctions_of_aTeam_Patrick_Lencioni
  16. Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2011). Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (2. Aufl.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. (Accessed: November 2020). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-16972-4
  17. Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed.). Prentice Hall. (Accessed: April .2023). https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog/589460498040e5ab4504b03f
  18. Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a "big five" in teamwork?. Small group research, 36(5), 555-599. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220041354_Is_there_a_Big_Five_in_Teamwork
  19. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2-24. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/industrial-and-organizational-psychology/article/teams-are-changing-are-research-and-practice-evolving-fast-enough/6D811E1C7B16B12A14C403E720F3C2C3
  20. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384-399. (Accessed: 5.05.2023). https://sci-hub.se/10.1037/h0022100
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox