|
|
| (107 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | | + | http://apppm.man.dtu.dk/index.php/Knowledge_sharing_in_project_management |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Knowledge management (KM) is the process of capturing, developing, sharing, and effectively using organizational knowledge.[source: wikipedia (Davenport)]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The aim of this article is to identify within a project in an organization how knowledge is created, transferred and reused in a project management environment. Two main areas will be studied: intra-project and inter-project learning and organizational memory and knowledge sharing. Intra-project learning consists of knowledge created and shared within a project, whereas inter-project learning is based in reusing existing knowledge from project to project.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | There are mainly two types of knowledge: explicit and tacit. Explicit knowledge is knowledge that is expressed tangibly and can potentially be stored in databases or documents. Tacit knowledge, instead, is stored in a person´s head and cannot be readily expressed in words.[source: Jill Owen] Each of them will be studied later.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Intra and inter-project learning is explained through the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The PDSA cycle is based on the premise that for an organization to continually improve or learn they need to plan for it, implement the plan, analyse or study the results and act on the analysis[source: Jill Owen]. Intra-project learning is the process in which new knowledge is created when overcoming problems in projects. Intra-project learning can occur in different ways but should be documented in order to transfer it to other projects within the company[source: ]. This concept is called knowledge reuse.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Knowledge that is gained in different projects needs to be transferred to an organization's memory for reuse on other projects. This information transfer is essential for the organization's prosperity. Therefore, a knowledge management strategy should developed to determine how knowledge should be reported, stored, shared and used. [source: Audrey S. Bollinger, Robert D. Smith, "Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset", Journal of Knowledge Management", 2001; http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/13673270110384365]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Importance of knowledge management ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Knowledge is a vital resource in project-based industries such as aerospace, construction, shipbuilding and software. Considering management of knowledge is a necessary prerequisite for project success in today’s dynamic and changing environment. <ref>["E.D. Love; Edum-Fotwe; Irani, Zahir; Management of knowledge in project environments, International Journal of Project Management, 2003"]"http://production.datastore.cvt.dk/filestore?oid=539faae8759347984c02cb28&targetid=539faae8759347984c02cb2a"</ref>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Key business objectives for project management in companies are to: increase customer retention and acquisition, increase returns on projects, and minimise risks. Crucial factors in achieving these objectives are related to managing, applying and reusing knowledge gained throughout the project lifecycle. If useful information is identified, assimilated and retained within the organization, it represents intellectual capital that can be reused on other projects, reducing the time staff spend recreating what has already been learned, and therefore improving program management in general. Such organizations must continually develop their core competencies or project management capabilities to successfully win and execute projects to meet client needs. [source: Jill Owen]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Effective project management is a key enabler for business success. However, where corporate knowledge is ineffectively managed during the project lifecycle, valuable intellectual capital is lost or devalued, causing rework and lost opportunities. The management and transfer of knowledge can support an organization in improving organizational learning. From the project management point of view, this in turn should help deliver more projects on time and within budget, or alternatively deliver projects of a higher quality for an increased profit. This also leads to higher customer satisfaction and better reputation for the organization. [source: Jill Owen]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | To succeed competitively and to achieve their business strategies and goals, organizations such as project management organizations need an effective knowledge management strategy in order to maintain valuable intellectual capital and not causing rework to employees.[source: Jill Owens]
| + | |
| − | Effective knowledge management and learning are also essential to ensure a qualified and polyvalent staff. It also affects to the personal satisfaction of employees, as they consider their work to be valuable and efficient. For technology-based organizations, continuous learning is a helpful strategy to remain innovative.[source: ]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Intra and inter project learning and knowledge creation ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | In a company, two projects will never be exactly the same. Possibilities to find similar projects are high, but each project is unique due to several factors such as project definition, tasks or members, among others. Therefore, projects are especially suitable for learning. <ref>["Bojnord, Nahid Hashemian, and Abbas Afrazeh. "Knowledge management in project phases." Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 2006."]"http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=030AEFF61AE7CA7C95EBFD8B82DFF04C?doi=10.1.1.547.3707&rep=rep1&type=pdf"</ref>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === PDSA cycle ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is an iterative, four-stage problem-solving model used for improving a process or carrying out change <ref>["Health Partnership Division, PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act, Minnesota Department of Health Journal, August 2016"]"http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/opi/qi/toolbox/print/pdsa.pdf"</ref>. Applied to the field of knowledge management, it is used to characterize knowledge creation and learning in a project management environment, and is linked to the Project Management Institute´s Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK).
| + | |
| − | The PDSA model is valid to explain two possible situations in a project-based environment. On the one hand, it can explain the process within a project where an iterative process is used to find the best solution for a problem. This means that inside a project there are several PDSA cycles, and the design is improved and refined until the final solution is obtained. On the other hand, taking into account that a project is a single PDSA cycle, it explains how knowledge that is gained from one project can be saved and transferred to be reused in future projects.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | In both cases, The PDSA cycle is based on the premise that for an organization to continually improve or learn they need to plan for it, implement the plan, analyze or study the results and act on the analysis [Jill Owens]. In the following explanation the second situation will be considered, but it can be perfectly applicable to the first situation as well.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Media:PDSA.jpg]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The “Plan” step is where the cycle usually starts. When a project is assigned to a project manager, the first step is to plan and decide how it is going to be carried out. There are several points that need to be taken into account. The most relevant ones are explained next:
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Recruit a team: Assemble a team that has knowledge of the problem or opportunity for improvement. Consider the strengths each team member brings and look for a balanced, engaged and forward-thinking staff. Roles and responsibilities should also be identified and assigned to all the members of the group. (source: health minnesota)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Describe the problem: It is important that all the members of the group have a clear understanding of the problem. (source: health minnesota)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Define the goal: The objectives of the project need to be clear and every member of the group should know what needs to be accomplished. (source: health minnesota)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Make a plan: Analyze how the previously defined goals could be accomplished in the most efficient way. Develop an action plan, including necessary resources and a timeline. Identify risks that might come up in the implementation process and develop alternatives in relation to the risks. (source: health minnesota) [http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/opi/qi/toolbox/print/pdsa.pdf]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The "Do" step is where the project team implements the previously defined plan. During this process the project team identifies problems that were not planned in the previous stage and these need to be solved in order to deliver the project successfully. Learning takes place when project team members discuss approaches for completing a task or overcoming problems [http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/02656710010298418]. Knowledge is created by individuals and groups building on existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. This knowledge can either be coded in project documentation or is stored with the project member, as it usually occurs in informal situations [Knowledge reuse and transfer in a project management environment (1)]. The intra-learning occurs continually throughout the project life cycle <ref>["Tim Kotnour, (2000). "Organizational learning practices in the project management environment". International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management"]"http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/02656710010298418"</ref>. A way of ensuring that project learning occurs is to ensure that knowledge is captured at regular review points during the project lifecycle. (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | In the "Study" step the project team reflects on the associated plans, and assesses what has occurred in the project, determining both good and bad instances. The output of this step is a lesson learned, which is a tool to consolidate the knowledge gained throughout the project. A lesson learned overcomes the barriers to organizational learning and knowledge sharing by playing two roles. First, the process of developing a lesson learned provides an opportunity for the project team to take reflective time to gain a full understanding of project results. Actions are identified as good or bad as well as procedures to carry them out. The lesson learned should describe the actions to take or avoid on similar projects. Second, a lesson learned is a mechanism to document the learning of the project team to share with other members in the company [source: Tim Kotnour].
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The "Act" step is the next step where the cycle is completed and knowledge gained from one project can be input into future projects. It represents the transition from project to project. Then, if a project as a whole is seen as a PDSA cycle, the "Act" step is the one that links one cycle with the next one. For example, a lessons learned document of a current project supports the planning stage of the next project by providing information and knowledge gained from one PDSA cycle to another. (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Media:Project_Life_Cycle.jpg]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | An example will be shown next. Boeing first introduced the 737 and 747 plane programs with serious problems. To ensure that problems were not repeated, senior managers commissioned a high-level employee group, called Project Homework, to compare the development processes of the 737 and 747 with those of the 707 and 727, two of the company's most profitable planes. The group was asked to develop a set of "lessons learned" that could be used on future projects. After working for three years, they produced hundreds of recommendations and an inch-thich booklet. Several members of the team were then transferred to the 757 and 767 start-ups and guided by experience, they produced the most successful, error-free launches in Boeing's history. (source: David A. Garvin. Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | This is a example that shows perfectly all the steps of the PDSA cycle. The critical step in this cycle was definitely the "study" part, as they gave a high relevance to observe and analyze the differences between the planes that failed and the ones that succeed. It also shows how explicit and tacit knowledge were managed. Explicit knowledge was created by noting down recommendations in a booklet, whereas tacit knowledge was also transferred as these individuals were part of the new project team.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Organizational memory and knowledge sharing==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Knowledge that is gained in a project needs to be transferred to an organization´s memory for reuse on other projects. Organizational memory is the accumulated body of information and knowledge created in the course of an individual organization´s existence. (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | The organizational memory can be divided up in two main groups: organization´s archives (including its electronic data bases); and individual´s memories. (source: )
| + | |
| − | The challenge is to capture and index this knowledge for retrieval while it is available, as project teams are temporary. The context in which knowledge transfer happens is important, especially for tacit knowledge, because usually people exchange knowledge personally based on trust and experience. (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | As stated in the previous chapter, a project knowledge base is created when a project is carried out. This knowledge is stored in two ways mainly: formal and explicit documentation (lessons learned) and within each of the individual members of the project group. This information will not be useful for the organization unless it is shared with other members in the organization. It is essential that this information is shared effectively. For that purpose, a knowledge management plan should be established. If done it successfully, the loss of information throughout the process would be minimal, enhancing the reuse of knowledge for other projects.
| + | |
| − | Explicit knowledge is usually shared through archives or documentation. Lessons learned from all the different projects that the organization has carried out throughout years should be archived and stored for future look up by any of the members of the organization. Bear in mind that employees will also use it as a source of learning if the system is easy and straightforward. Therefore, knowledge management tools are a great step forward in order to keep the information well-structured and organized. Computer-based information systems have been key in the improvement of such databases, which make the information exchange much easier and convenient. In this way, the information remains stored within the organization and it is ready for lookup and reuse in future projects. [http://www.uky.edu/~gmswan3/575/KM_and_OL.pdf]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[Media: Organizational_Knowledge.jpg]]
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Tacit knowledge is more difficult to share because it is something that an individual has learnt through experience and cannot be transferred to a document effectively. Absorbing facts by reading them or seeing them demonstrated is one thing; experiencing them personally is quite another. It is very difficult to become knowledgeable in a passive way. (source: harvard business review) Actively experiencing something is considerably more valuable than having it described. This type of knowledge is usually shared within the members of the organization based on trust and experience; therefore, human relations and social behavior play a key role. Some practical means of transferring tacit knowledge will be explained shortly next:
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Tours within the organization: it allows employees to see how other colleagues work and knowledge is shared. (soruce: harvard business review)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Personnel rotation programs: probably one of the most powerful methods of transferring knowledge. Those in daily contact with these experts benefit enormously from their skills. Transferring them to different parts of the organization helps share the wealth and knowledge. (source: harvard business review)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • Training programs within the company: this enables social networking and enables knowledge sharing among its members if they are well designed. (source: harvard business review)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Continuous learning is essential for companies in fast-growing industries to be able to respond to changes in the business environment. In order to maintain competitive advantage, organizations need to learn and obtain knowledge faster than their competitors. A knowledge management strategy is developed by the organization for improving how it develops, stores and uses its corporate knowledge. Both tacit and explicit knowledge are important in the creation and reuse of knowledge. Organizational memory forms the basis of intellectual capital that is held in an organization. Intellectual capital is the knowledge and capability to develop that knowledge in an organization.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Four key factors are critical to a project-based organization´s capacity to learn: (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • A culture that encourages learning
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • A strategy that allows learning
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • An organizational structure that promotes innovative development
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | • The environment
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | These factors contribute to individuals creating, transferring and reusing knowledge leading to organizational learning. For a project organization to continually learn and develop, organizational learning needs to occur. Organizations with these characteristics and mindset, that integrate learning as part of their business, are called learning organizations. (source: Jill Owens)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Discussion ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Taking into account the benefits that effective knowledge management can bring to project-based organizations, I find improvement in this field essential to remain competitive in our fast-paced and changing environment. The PDSA cycle is a very clearly defined cycle that can be applied within projects, programs and also portfolios with the objective of continuous improvement in mind. If applied correctly, it can definitely lead to growth in a business environment.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | In my opinion, explicit knowledge management processes such as lessons learned should be implemented in all the project-based organizations. Currently, corporations that do not give importance or put emphasis in developing an organizational memory are falling behind its competitors. The biggest obstacles to develop this knowledge are: lack of efficient systems, lack of time that employees believe they have and lack of learning culture.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | In order to promote learning in an organization, it is essential to have a good knowledge system based on IT tools. From the employee´s point of view, looking up documentation from other projects has to be an easy and fast process, because if they don´t find the desired information rapidly, they will get irritated and will not use this source of information again. Therefore, it is very important that employees rely on the system and find this as a rich source of information to gain knowledge and find guidance in order to solve problems.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | There are many people that live stressed at work. They always have to deliver projects in time, they sometimes are allocated to several projects at the same time and usually they are always too busy to take some time and reflect. They sometimes make the same mistakes and need to redo their work in order to correct them. This is a very inefficient way of working and it is also an organization´s cultural issue. To prevent workers from this kind of situations, I find essential a change in project approach and organizational culture. The organization should consider learning as part of their strategy and encourage knowledge sharing among the company.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Acquiring explicit knowledge is a matter of change in habits and organizational culture. Its cost is almost negligible compared to the benefits that can bring to the company.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Tacit knowledge sharing is also an important factor in organizational memory. However, its sharing is not as easy and straightforward as in explicit knowledge. Tacit knowledge relies in social networks and behaviors, so it is directly linked to human psychology. Therefore, setting the framework for social networking between employees will probably increase the sharing of knowledge in the organization. However, there is still lots of research to do behind psychology and cognitive behavior. When a better understanding of the brain is obtained, better methods could be applied to develop more effectively the creation and sharing of tacit knowledge among the employees of the organizations.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Annotated bibliography ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == References ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <references/>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 1. Bastian Hanisch Frank Lindner Ana Mueller Andreas Wald, (2009),"Knowledge management in project environments", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 13 Iss 4 pp. 148 - 160.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 2. Jill Owen, Frada Burstein & Steven Mitchell (2004) Knowledge Reuse and Transfer in a Project Management Environment, Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 6:4, 21-35, DOI: 10.1080/15228053.2004.10856052.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 3. Audrey S. Bollinger, Robert D. Smith, (2001),"Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5 Iss 1 pp. 8 - 18.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 4. David A. Garvin "Building a learning organization", Harvard Business Review July-August 1993.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 5. Lynda Bourne Derek H.T. Walker, (2004),"Advancing project management in learning organizations", The Learning Organization, Vol. 11 Iss 3 pp. 226 - 243
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | 6. Adrian Carr, (1997),"The learning organization", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 16 Iss 4 pp. 224 - 231
| + | |
