Talk:Delphi Method (expert for identification)
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "==Feedback on Abstract:== {| |'''Text clarity'''|| The text sounds comprehensible |- |'''Language'''|| OK with minor misspellings |- |'''Description of the tool/theory/concep...") |
(→Feedback on Abstract:) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|'''Title of the Wiki'''|| OK initially, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article | |'''Title of the Wiki'''|| OK initially, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''References'''|| | + | |'''References'''|| Ok |
|} | |} | ||
==Other== | ==Other== | ||
| − | The describes historical aspects that are not relevant for the abstract, | + | The article describes historical aspects that are not relevant for the abstract, this historical aspects will have a better fit in the historical section of this article. |
Latest revision as of 10:19, 18 September 2017
[edit] Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity | The text sounds comprehensible |
| Language | OK with minor misspellings |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Not clear, different uses an applications are explained but not a clear description of the method. |
| Purpose explanation | There is not clear for the reader, try to explain the intention of the article |
| Title of the Wiki | OK initially, probably need to be rethinking in order to reflect the content of the Article |
| References | Ok |
[edit] Other
The article describes historical aspects that are not relevant for the abstract, this historical aspects will have a better fit in the historical section of this article.
