Talk:Roles and responsibilities of program manager
(→Answer 4) |
(→Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Sofie Melchior Karlson) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 151: | Line 151: | ||
===Answer 5=== | ===Answer 5=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''I think the article is practical and academic relevant, because it tells about the different roles the program manager has and is also compared to the project manager. I am maybe missing a bit more explanation on why it is relevant.'' |
===Question 6 · TEXT=== | ===Question 6 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 163: | Line 163: | ||
===Answer 6=== | ===Answer 6=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''I think it is interesting for both the practitioner and the academic, because is tells about what the program manager should do and in academic it teels more with forexample the comparison. The article is not finishes so I am not sure if it is going to be significant contribution beyond a cursory web search'' |
===Question 7 · TEXT=== | ===Question 7 · TEXT=== | ||
| Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
===Answer 7=== | ===Answer 7=== | ||
| − | '' | + | ''Is could be nice with a headline called annotated bibliography, where you can tell about other places (homepages) where you can read additionally to your article. Missing mandatory reference. (This is written in the powerpoint)'' |
Latest revision as of 12:40, 18 February 2018
Contents |
[edit] Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Konstantinos Terzakis
[edit] Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 1
The summary describes very nice the roles and the responsibilities of a program manager and it gives to the reader the sense that a generic article follows, that describes the main duties and of a program managers. I would suggest to include also some descriptions (maybe at the end of the summary) about what's next in the article to provide the reader with a more specific insight ( for instance, refer to the description of the tools as well as that there is also an example provided.
[edit] Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 2
The article is coherent and there is a logical flow, making it easy for the reader to separate the content in each section. Although, it seems that the article is not completed, as some paragraphs do not include the information needed (i.e. information about the tools, as there is only a list, no data regarding limitations). I would also suggest to write the paragraph "Roles and responsibilities" with a more coherent manner.
[edit] Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 3
There are no grammatical or spelling erros, except for some points where it seems that the article is under construction. Nice usage of the language. I would suggest to avoid using "his/her" when refering to a person (i.e. Program manager)
[edit] Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 4
The figures summarize the key points of the article very nice, although I would suggest to enlarge both these 2 pictures and to place the reference as well.
[edit] Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 5
The article is practical and I think there is an academic relevance, especially for a reader who has not study in depth about the Programming Management. A potential reader can find useful and summarized information about this topic.
[edit] Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 6
The article is not completed so I cannot say a lot about its contribution beyond a cursory web search, but I suggest to include a critical review from the author.
[edit] Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 7
There is no data regarding the annotated bibliography so no comments on this. There are only two web-based references. I suggest to include some references from the PMBOK (A guide to the Project Management body of knowlegde) or other book that refers to the PMI standars.
[edit] Feedback 2 | Reviewer name: Sofie Melchior Karlson
[edit] Question 1 · TEXT
Quality of the summary:
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 1
Very nice summary. I like that I get a very fast telling about the Roles and resposibilities of a program manager. I am missing a statement which tells me what the article is going to learn/ go through. What are you going to tell about?
[edit] Question 2 · TEXT
Structure and logic of the article:
Is the argument clear?
Is there a logical flow to the article?
Does one part build upon the other?
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 2
Argument is clear. Very nice flow thought the article. Very good headlines and very easy to read. A longlist in roles and responsibilities, does the program manager do it all by themself? and is some of the functions more important than others?
[edit] Question 3 · TEXT
Grammar and style:
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 3
No gramma mistakes. Very precise language. I dont like the he/she, meybe say "they" or "program manager"
[edit] Question 4 · TEXT
Figures and tables:
Are figures and tables clear?
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 4
Good pictures and video, they are very telling and make a better understanding of the text. Missing references for the picturs and video.
[edit] Question 5 · TEXT
Interest and relevance:
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 5
I think the article is practical and academic relevant, because it tells about the different roles the program manager has and is also compared to the project manager. I am maybe missing a bit more explanation on why it is relevant.
[edit] Question 6 · TEXT
Depth of treatment:
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 6
I think it is interesting for both the practitioner and the academic, because is tells about what the program manager should do and in academic it teels more with forexample the comparison. The article is not finishes so I am not sure if it is going to be significant contribution beyond a cursory web search
[edit] Question 7 · TEXT
Annotated bibliography:
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
What would you suggest to improve?
[edit] Answer 7
Is could be nice with a headline called annotated bibliography, where you can tell about other places (homepages) where you can read additionally to your article. Missing mandatory reference. (This is written in the powerpoint)
