Talk:Outcome, output, benefit
From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Bartlomiej (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "aaa") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Feedback on Abstract:== | |
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | |'''Text clarity'''|| Good | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Language'''|| Good | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Description of the tool/theory/concept'''|| Not that clear | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Purpose explanation'''|| OK | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Title of the Wiki'''|| OK but the title could be more specific. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Relevance to curriculum'''|| Relevant. Good you decided to focus on one of the types of management and not all of them. | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''References'''|| Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Other'''|| The abstract is too short. Have a look at the recommended structure for the wiki in the Course Handbook. What will the reader gain more than an explanation the words outcome, output and benefit? | ||
| + | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:11, 19 February 2019
[edit] Feedback on Abstract:
| Text clarity | Good |
| Language | Good |
| Description of the tool/theory/concept | Not that clear |
| Purpose explanation | OK |
| Title of the Wiki | OK but the title could be more specific. |
| Relevance to curriculum | Relevant. Good you decided to focus on one of the types of management and not all of them. |
| References | Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references |
| Other | The abstract is too short. Have a look at the recommended structure for the wiki in the Course Handbook. What will the reader gain more than an explanation the words outcome, output and benefit? |
