Talk:Project Management: Cost vs. Price

From apppm
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎Feedback on Abstract:)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 81: Line 81:
  
 
===Answer 5===
 
===Answer 5===
−
The article and the theme is interesting, has strong academic relevance, and it is clear in the text why. As it is said in the abstract all the projects are exposed to a certain level of uncertainty and the managers need support to overcome the obstacles - these articles can play a big role in helping the managers.
+
It has high academic relevance as it makes you understand the cost parameters in terms of pro
  
 
===Question 6 · TEXT===
 
===Question 6 · TEXT===
Line 93: Line 93:
  
 
===Answer 6===
 
===Answer 6===
−
Like said above, the article has a strong real life application and for this reason should be further developed deeper. At the moment doesn't add any value to what can be found online.  
+
"Setting a price for a project is usually done by the company’s marketing department" in this line it is confusing as I think you should talk about deliverables/product, not about the project. Everything is relevant in the article except in some points it makes confusion in Project / Product
  
 
===Question 7 · TEXT===
 
===Question 7 · TEXT===
Line 107: Line 107:
  
 
===Answer 7===
 
===Answer 7===
−
The conclusion must be finished, must conclude and summarize all the key points from all the article.
+
the article is very well summarized with proper citations
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Feedback 2| Reviewer name: ''Rasmine Søgren''==
 +
 
 +
===Question 1 ===
 +
Quality of the summary:
 +
Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 1:The summery are good, and the language is good.
 +
 
 +
===Question 2===
 +
Structure and logic of the article:
 +
Is the argument clear?
 +
Is there a logical flow to the article?
 +
Does one part build upon the other?
 +
Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 2: The article is very good and the division of the article is good. The sections have good headlines and the writer makes the topic easy to understand.
 +
 
 +
===Question 3===
 +
Grammar and style:
 +
Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?
 +
Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 3: As a starting point the whole text is good. There are just few grammatical errors.
 +
 
 +
===Question 4===
 +
Figures and tables:
 +
Are figures and tables clear?
 +
Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 4: Figures are placed well on the right side.
 +
 
 +
===Question 5===
 +
Interest and relevance:
 +
Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance?
 +
Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 5: I think the topic of choice is good and relevant.
 +
 
 +
===Question 6===
 +
Depth of treatment:
 +
Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?
 +
Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 6: I think the article and topic are good - I have no objections to this.
 +
 
 +
===Question 7===
 +
Annotated bibliography:
 +
Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?
 +
Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?
 +
Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?
 +
What would you suggest to improve?
 +
 
 +
Answer 7: I think the article and topic are good - I have no objections to this.

Latest revision as of 19:19, 25 February 2019

Contents

[edit] Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity Good
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good
Purpose explanation Good
Title of the Wiki Good but could also be cost and price in project management
Relevance to curriculum Relevant
References Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library: https://www.bibliotek.dtu.dk/english/servicemenu/find/reference_management/references
Other The abstract is a bit short so if you want to be a bit more specific you have space.


[edit] Feedback 1 | Reviewer name: Rajat Kumar

[edit] Question 1 · TEXT

Quality of the summary:

Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 1

The content in the summary is clearly described and illustrates the idea in whole article.

[edit] Question 2 · TEXT

Structure and logic of the article:

Is the argument clear?

Is there a logical flow to the article?

Does one part build upon the other?

Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 2

Nicely structured in the proper lexical sense and this makes very easy to understand and interesting to read.

[edit] Question 3 · TEXT

Grammar and style:

Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors?

Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 3

No waste words have been used and language used precisely describes the topic.

[edit] Question 4 · TEXT

Figures and tables:

Are figures and tables clear?

Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 4

Excellent correlation between the content and figures. Figures in the article make it easy to understand what the authors want to say.

[edit] Question 5 · TEXT

Interest and relevance:

Is the article of high practical and/or academic relevance?

Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 5

It has high academic relevance as it makes you understand the cost parameters in terms of pro

[edit] Question 6 · TEXT

Depth of treatment:

Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read?

Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 6

"Setting a price for a project is usually done by the company’s marketing department" in this line it is confusing as I think you should talk about deliverables/product, not about the project. Everything is relevant in the article except in some points it makes confusion in Project / Product

[edit] Question 7 · TEXT

Annotated bibliography:

Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work?

Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article?

Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion?

What would you suggest to improve?

[edit] Answer 7

the article is very well summarized with proper citations


[edit] Feedback 2| Reviewer name: Rasmine Søgren

[edit] Question 1

Quality of the summary: Does the summary make the key focus, insights and/or contribution of the article clear? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 1:The summery are good, and the language is good.

[edit] Question 2

Structure and logic of the article: Is the argument clear? Is there a logical flow to the article? Does one part build upon the other? Is the article consistent in its argument and free of contradictions? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 2: The article is very good and the division of the article is good. The sections have good headlines and the writer makes the topic easy to understand.

[edit] Question 3

Grammar and style: Is the writing free of grammatical and spelling errors? Is the language precise without unnecessary fill words? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 3: As a starting point the whole text is good. There are just few grammatical errors.

[edit] Question 4

Figures and tables: Are figures and tables clear? Do they summarize the key points of the article in a meaningful way? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 4: Figures are placed well on the right side.

[edit] Question 5

Interest and relevance: Is the article of high practical and / or academic relevance? Is it made clear in the article why / how it is relevant? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 5: I think the topic of choice is good and relevant.

[edit] Question 6

Depth of treatment: Is the article interesting for a practitioner or academic to read? Does it make a significant contribution beyond a cursory web search? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 6: I think the article and topic are good - I have no objections to this.

[edit] Question 7

Annotated bibliography: Does the article properly cite and acknowledge previous work? Does it briefly summarize the key references at the end of the article? Is it based on empirical data instead of opinion? What would you suggest to improve?

Answer 7: I think the article and topic are good - I have no objections to this.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.doing-projects.org/index.php?title=Talk:Project_Management:_Cost_vs._Price&oldid=66893"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox