Benefits Realisation Management (BRM)
(→Abstract) |
(→Introduction to Benefits) |
||
(96 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=Abstract= | =Abstract= | ||
− | '''Benefits | + | '''Benefits Realisation Management''' or '''BRM''', is a method used in management to define and measure the '''value''' that a project, program or portfolio management will bring into a company.<ref name=Fra>PMI Benefits realization management Framework (2016)</ref> |
+ | The BRM is based on identify and work with the '''benefits''' of a determinate project, program or portfolio. | ||
− | + | Although the method and its techniques can be used either for a project, program or a portfolio, this article will cover the BRM related to a program. | |
− | + | This article will also discuss the relation between the method and the '''success''' of a determinate program. | |
− | + | The benefits realisation management purpose is to identify the benefits that the organisation is going to acquire. Moreover, the BRM aligns the benefits with the interest and the vision statement of the company and it, also, strongly increases the possibility that they will be gained. | |
− | + | ||
− | The benefits realisation management purpose is to identify the benefits that the organisation is going to acquire. Moreover, | + | |
Indeed, one of the key point of the benefits realisation management is not only to define the benefits, but as well to decrease the possible risks related to these benefits. | Indeed, one of the key point of the benefits realisation management is not only to define the benefits, but as well to decrease the possible risks related to these benefits. | ||
The BRM method can be decomposed in three different steps : '''identify benefits''', '''execute benefits''' and '''sustain benefits'''.<ref name=Fra/> | The BRM method can be decomposed in three different steps : '''identify benefits''', '''execute benefits''' and '''sustain benefits'''.<ref name=Fra/> | ||
− | + | Firstly, it is important to understand whether a project, program or portfolio management will add value to the company. | |
− | Firstly, is important to understand | + | |
Secondly, the addition of new benefits and the decrease of risk in the existing one. | Secondly, the addition of new benefits and the decrease of risk in the existing one. | ||
− | Finally, | + | Finally, during the sustainment process, the manager ensures whatever the project or program produces will keep adding value to the company beyond the end of the program. |
These three aspects of the method and their techniques will be deeply discussed in detail further on the article. | These three aspects of the method and their techniques will be deeply discussed in detail further on the article. | ||
− | Even though using the benefit realisation management | + | Even though using the benefit realisation management brings to the company many advantages, it also has some limitations which will be introduced and analysed. |
=Introduction to Benefits= | =Introduction to Benefits= | ||
− | + | The term benefits refers to all the outcomes of a program which increase or add value to the organisation or the stakeholders. | |
− | “''Benefits are measurable and quantifiable improvements, which are normally expressed in financial terms, so they can justify any investment that may be required from the business''”. <ref name=Serra>Serra C. E. M. Benefits | + | “''Benefits are measurable and quantifiable improvements, which are normally expressed in financial terms, so they can justify any investment that may be required from the business''”. <ref name=Serra>Serra C. E. M. Benefits realization management: Benefits Realization Management: Strategic Value from Portfolios, Programs, and Projects (Best Practices in Portfolio, Program, and Project Management) (2016)</ref> |
+ | Different '''kinds of benefits''' may be generated by a program, and even if they have all positive effects they may require different approaches. | ||
+ | Indeed, although some of the benefits are '''certain''' or are related to a specific condition or achievement, others may be '''difficult to predict''' or '''highly uncertain'''.<ref name=Pmithesta>PMI The Standard for Program Management, Pennsylvania (2017)</ref> <br /> | ||
+ | Furthermore, the benefits may be either '''quantifiable''' or '''unquantifiable'''. <br /> | ||
+ | Indeed, if they are not financial benefits, the measurement of them may be difficult. | ||
+ | To give an example the increase of employee satisfaction with a program is not as quantifiable and predictable as the achievement of a precise quote on the market. | ||
− | + | Besides, the '''three Es''' is another possible classification for the benefits, which allows to cover, organise and manage the majority of them. | |
− | + | The three categories are: | |
− | + | *'''ECONOMIC BENEFITS''': all the positive benefits related with the financial aspect and the cashflow. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | *'''EFFECTIVENESS BENEFITS''': Improvement on the standard | |
− | ''' | + | *'''EFFICIENCY BENEFITS''': Improvement on the allocation of resources. <ref name=Msp>Axelos Managing Successful Programmes (2011). Available from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4462753</ref> |
− | ''' | + | Moving forward to the '''characteristics''' of benefits, they often have a defined beneficiar and it may be either the company, the stakeholders or even the customers. |
+ | By the way, even though the direct beneficiar is not the organisation, the latter may also gain value from delivery benefits to others. | ||
+ | In fact, an improved or a new ability of constantly deliver and sustain the products or services, can benefit the organisation. <ref name=Pmithesta/> | ||
− | ''' | + | On the other hand, if the defined beneficiaries of a program do not realise the advantage of an outcome, it could have negative impact on the sponsor of the program. Some stakeholders may see the benefit as a negative outcome for them: '''dis-benefit'''.<ref name=Msp/> <br /> |
+ | Consequently, is important to minimise this risk by communicating the benefits and aligning them with the interest of the beneficiaries. Every stakeholders must be aware of the positive outcomes of a program and how the benefits contribute achieving the main company’s objectives. <ref name=Pmithesta/> | ||
− | + | The benefits of a program do not have a specific '''period'''. | |
− | + | Indeed, they may be delivered during the development of the program by one of its activities. For instance a project within the program may end and produce a positive outcome for the company, even when the program has not ended. | |
− | + | Besides, they may be provide when the program finishes or, furthermore, they can be shown after the closure of it. | |
− | + | The '''value gap''', between the real situation of the company and the future desired one, may be filled with all the benefits provided by all the successful programs. <ref name=Serra/> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | [[File:PrimaPP.png|thumb|x300px|alt=Value Gap representation|Figure 1: Representation of how benefits may fill the value gap between the current situation and the aimed one, inspired by Benefits Realization Management: Strategic Value from Portfolios, Programs, and Projects (Best Practices in Portfolio, Program, and Project Management) (2016) <ref name = Serra/>]] | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | =Relation between benefits and success of a program= | |
− | + | In the last 20 years most of the companies (60%-80% according to a study conducted in 2008 by Kaplan and Norton) failing to deliver the expected outcomes of their projects, consequently even the business strategies come to nothing. <ref name=Serra/> <br /> | |
+ | Decide whether a program is '''successful''' or not can create some ambiguity. <br /> | ||
+ | Indeed, most of the time it depends on the '''criteria''' that are chosen to evaluate it. <br /> | ||
− | + | As a matter of fact even though a program ends within the expected budget and perfectly in time, it may be a failure in terms of additional value acquired by the company. <br /> | |
+ | On the contrary, it could happen that the outcomes provided by a program outweigh the failure in terms of cost and timing. <br /> | ||
+ | In point of fact, is not sufficient that the outcomes are positive if they are '''not aligned''' with the interests of the organisation. <br /> | ||
+ | In order to increase the value of the company a program should generate benefits that help the company in achieving its main objectives, in order to aim for both the success of the program and the company. <ref name=Serra/> | ||
− | + | To give an example, a t-shirt company which would like to compete in the sport sector may be able to produce the products perfectly on time and budget and sell all of them, but not in another market. Still, all these positive aspects do not add the aimed value to the company, nor move it towards it's objective. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | In short, the success of a program is achieved when the gained benefits are '''aligned''' with how an organisation would like to improve. Consequently, the Benefits realisation management may be fundamental for the purpose of a successful program and achievement of the business strategies. <ref name=Serra/> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | To give an example a t- | + | |
− | |||
− | |||
=What is BMR and why is it important?= | =What is BMR and why is it important?= | ||
− | The Benefits realisation management | + | The Benefits realisation management consists in a '''series of processes''' which aim to ensure a program outcomes will increase the '''value''' of a company. <br /> |
− | Moreover this method measure | + | Moreover, this method measure this value and manage, during the development of the program, the risks related to it. <ref name=Fra/> <br /> |
− | The BMR plays a critical role in | + | The BMR plays a critical role in program management.<br /> |
+ | In fact, it allows the manager to understand whether the impact, the program will have on the organisation, will be positive or not. | ||
+ | Furthermore, this method helps the program manager to recognise and realise the amount of resources and effort, which will be implied in the program, necessary to deliver the identified benefits. | ||
− | First of all the | + | As just mentioned before, the '''BRM Framework''' consist of three step that will be further deeply explained. |
+ | First of all, the manager will establish whether a program can produce value to the organisation. <br /> | ||
+ | In order to do so the '''identification''' of the possible benefits of the program is necessary. | ||
+ | Indeed, a project could have benefits that are not aligned with the vision statement of the company or with the will of the stakeholders, consequently it would move the organisation towards an undesired direction. | ||
+ | For this reason, is important, during the planning, deeply understand if the program can decrease the value gap between the current position and the desired one. | ||
+ | Otherwise, the positive outcomes are not necessary for the organisation and they do not justify the implementation of the resources in the program. | ||
+ | In fact, all the benefits should be understood as a result, due to the fact they are the main reason a program starts. <ref name=Serra/> | ||
− | Secondly, this method point to achieve the minimum risk possible for each of the existing benefits. Indeed most of them may be compromised during the development of the projects within the program, therefore is enormously important keep monitoring and managing the benefits even when the program has started. | + | Secondly, this method point to achieve the '''minimum risk''' possible for each of the existing benefits. Indeed, most of them may be compromised during the development of the projects within the program, therefore is enormously important keep monitoring and managing the benefits even when the program has started. |
+ | The intermediate benefits, that the projects, within the program, may deliver, are as important as the final ones. Indeed, the achievement of those benefits will increase the commitment and the focus on the program. Besides, seeing the deliveries of these benefits, the stakeholders will be more supportive. <ref name=Msp/> | ||
+ | |||
Most of the time benefits are dynamic, hence monitor them may decrease the risk related to their acquirement. Besides, a risk structure of the benefits should be created in agreement with the risk appetite of the company. | Most of the time benefits are dynamic, hence monitor them may decrease the risk related to their acquirement. Besides, a risk structure of the benefits should be created in agreement with the risk appetite of the company. | ||
− | + | Furthermore, the benefits realisation management has the purpose to increase the possibility to '''gain''' new benefits. Indeed, during the development of the project new possible benefits could arise and more value may be added by them inclusion. | |
− | Finally, is important that whatever will be the outcome of the program, it will be adding value to the organisation and the stakeholders. | + | Finally, is important that whatever will be the outcome of the program, it will be adding value to the organisation and the stakeholders, even though the program has ended. |
+ | One of the goals of the BRM is to ensure that the whoever is going to manage the program outcomes will be able to '''sustain''' the positive impacts on the business. | ||
− | + | These three different phases can be identified respectively as: Identify benefits, Execute benefits and sustain benefits. <ref name=Fra/> | |
− | The Benefits realisation management allows the manager of a program to link the reasons of | + | The Benefits realisation management allows the manager of a program to link the reasons of it with the impact that its delivery will have on the business. |
− | The crucial reason to implement the BRM in a program is to move forward to the achievement of the business principal goals. | + | The crucial reason to implement the BRM in a program is to move forward to the achievement of the business principal goals. |
+ | In order to succeed in the '''business strategy''' the organisation has to execute a series of program successfully. <ref name=Serra/> | ||
+ | To identify what success looks like in a program the knowledge of business goals is necessary.<ref name=Pra/> | ||
+ | Indeed, knowing the objectives of the organisation and the positive outcomes of the program, the decisions of how many resources use on it or whether it ought be prioritised or not, become easier. | ||
− | + | The management of the benefits is a crucial aspect in the program management because, most of the time, benefits are the reason to justify the cost. | |
+ | In fact the positive outcomes of a program (benefits) are the main reason behind the investment. If one can ensure to have the benefits and, besides, these benefits are aligned with the goals of the company, consequently, the possibility that the program will be a success increase. <ref name=Pmithesta/> | ||
− | + | Even in the '''change management''' the BMR has a critical role. | |
− | + | Companies decide to change to obtain benefits. Hence, to implement, justify and support a change is of great significance to identify its benefits.. <ref name=Change>John Hayes - The Theory and Practice of Change Management-Palgrave (2014) </ref> | |
− | + | Since the '''resources''' of an organisation are not unlimited, the use of benefits realisation management improves the quality of the choices of an organisation. | |
− | As a | + | Indeed, if a company knows a program’s positive outcomes are not oriented with the vision statement, it will avoid the implementation of resources in a wrong direction. |
+ | As a consequence of this, both the misuse of resources decrees and the right path of success is reinforced. | ||
− | + | Shortly, the BRM maximises the '''effectiveness''' of a company.<ref name=Serra/> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
=Benefits Realisation Management Framework= | =Benefits Realisation Management Framework= | ||
− | As introduced in the previous chapter the Benefits Realisation Management | + | As introduced in the previous chapter the Benefits Realisation Management includes three main phases through which it is possible to identify, manage and ensure the benefits of a program. |
− | Each of these stages may also implement the use of | + | Each of these stages may also implement the use of '''practices''' and '''techniques''' which will be briefly described. |
== Identify Benefits == | == Identify Benefits == | ||
+ | The '''purpose''' of this first step, previously outlined, is to comprehend if the benefits of a program are aligned with the business plan of the company, in order to bring value to it. <br /> | ||
+ | Besides, a diligent analysis, of the individualised benefits, will improve their further managing. In order to pursue the right benefits a deeply understanding of the '''business case''' of the organisation is necessary. <ref name=Pra>PMI Benefit Realization Management Practice Guide (2019). Available from https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/practice-guides/benefits-realization</ref> <br /> | ||
− | + | As just mentioned before, the benefits should be '''identified''' and '''qualified''' through a process of analysation using all the available informations about the program. <br /> | |
− | As | + | As more informations arise, it is also important define the possible positive and negative '''risk''' related to the identified benefits. To give examples of these risks, they may be the disagreement from the stakeholders, unexpected outcomes or change in program activities. <br /> |
− | + | In the "''Identify Benefit''" phase the '''key performance indicators''' ('''KPIs''') should be pointed out. <br /> | |
− | + | Those are indicators which will help the manager of the program to follow the actual state of delivery of the benefits during the developing of the program. <br /> | |
+ | They will, also, allow him to compare these result with the planned ones. | ||
+ | Besides, the decisions of the future monitoring and controlling processes should be developed in this stage. | ||
− | + | Furthermore, it is important to '''classify''' these benefits in terms of '''time''' and '''life span'''. For this reason, the timing and the dependencies of each benefit should also be identified and communicate. Indeed, this practice will help the monitoring part to understand whether a benefit will be on time and what could be the problems which affect it. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | Different tools can be used to quantify, plan and give a profile to these benefits such as: '''benefits register''', '''benefits map''' or a '''benefit profile'''. | |
− | + | *'''BENEFITS REGISTER:''' | |
+ | The Benefit register is a document which includes and lists all the benefits of a program.<br /> | ||
+ | Its scope is to measure and share, during the development of the program, the delivery of those benefits.<br /> | ||
+ | The benefits register ought be update during the benefits analysis and planning. | ||
+ | In fact, a first development of this document is written during the identification of benefits, then an update version is create in collaboration with the stakeholders. | ||
+ | It is fundamental, in this update, to determine the key performance indicators that will be used to monitor the benefits performances during the program development. <ref name=Pmithesta/> <ref name=Pra/> | ||
− | + | [[File:Seconda.png|none|left|thumb|x400px|alt=Benefits Register|Figure 2: Template of a Benefits Register, inspired by PMI Benefit Realization Management Practice Guide (2019) <ref name = Pra/>]] | |
− | + | *'''BENEFITS MAP:''' | |
+ | The benefits map is a visual representation which relates the benefits with all the surrounding elements which have a cause-effect relation with them. <br /> | ||
+ | The interdependency among the benefits and any element which can affect their delivery should be shown on the map. | ||
+ | Indeed, even though some outcomes failure may be negligible for the success of the program, they may strongly affect the benefit realisation. <ref name=Msp/> | ||
+ | [[File:Terza.png|none|thumb|x500px|alt=Benefits Map|Figure 3: Example of a Benefits Map, inspired by Axelos Managing Successful Programmes (2011) <ref name = Msp/>]] | ||
− | + | *'''BENEFIT PROFILE:''' | |
− | + | The benefit profile is a description of the benefit and its main characteristics.<br /> | |
+ | Informations such as what is the benefit, who is the beneficiar, the timing and the criteria to measure it, are written in this document. | ||
+ | It helps in the analysis and planning of the benefits. Moreover, it becomes a part of the previously introduced Benefit register. | ||
+ | Furthermore <ref name=Pra/> | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:Quarta.png|none|left|thumb|x400px|alt=Benefit Profile|Figure 4: Template of a Benefit Profile, inspired by PMI Benefit Realization Management Practice Guide (2019) <ref name = Pra/>]] |
− | + | <br /> | |
− | + | <br /> | |
− | + | It is critical that the '''stakeholders''' or the '''sponsor of the program''' approve the benefits that arise from those studies. Besides, the communication plan of these benefits future progress is also established in this stage. A deep analysis of the stakeholders power and their idea about the benefits should be developed. The benefits distribution of the '''stakeholders matrix''' may help with this task. <ref name=Pmithesta/> <ref name=Pra/> | |
− | == | + | [[File:Quinta.png|none|thumb|x350px|alt=Stakeholders|Figure 5: Example of a stakeholder a matrix, inspired by Axelos Managing Successful Programmes (2011) <ref name = Msp/>]] |
− | + | Once all the benefits will be identified and classified, the attention will move to understand if these positive outcomes of the program are aligned with the vision statement or the business goals of the company. | |
+ | |||
+ | == Execute Benefits == | ||
− | + | In the "''Execute Benefits''" part of the methods the manager will guarantee the '''minimum risk''' for each previously outlined benefit and, in addition, he will focus on the discovery of possible '''new benefits''' that may be gained. <ref name=Fra/> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | One of the first step, on this stage of the Benefits Realisation Management, is to confirm that the stakeholders have deeply comprehended the positive outcomes of the program and how this benefits are going to affect in a positive way the business. <br /> | |
+ | This ensures that when the benefits will have been delivered they will see them as a '''gained value'''. <br /> | ||
+ | Moreover, the stakeholders must be informed about the '''progresses''' and '''deliveries''' of these benefits. <br /> | ||
+ | It is critical that the stakeholders will act in harmony with the benefits of the program, therefore they should be aware, also, of the dependencies related to these outcomes. <ref name=Fra/> <ref name=Msp/> | ||
− | + | Besides, '''the team''', which is working with the program, should deeply understand the importance and the impact of these benefits on the business of the company. In fact, they are the most involved people with the program deliveries and changes. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | In fact, it is possible that with the development of the project the business goals of the organisation may change. For this reason is critical monitoring and controlling whether a formerly identified positive outcome is still adding value to the company. | + | The process between the benefits analysis and planning and their delivery is not a linear process. <br /> |
+ | Indeed it is most of the time an '''iterative process''', in which corrective action are continuously necessary as the planned conditions change. This informations about the environment come from the continuous monitoring of the organisation. <br /> | ||
+ | The progresses of the benefits have to be continuously reviewed to realise if some change, in the program activities, may be needed, in order to move the the positive outcomes closer to the original expectation. | ||
+ | These '''progresses''' can be monitored using the previously defined measures and key indicators. <br /> | ||
+ | During all the duration of the program is critical that benefits will be continuously reviewed to better reflect the ongoing business objectives. This will avoid that benefits, identified before a program beginning, will be no longer an adding value for the company at the moment of the delivery. <ref name=Pmithesta/><br /> | ||
+ | In fact, it is possible that with the development of the project the business goals of the organisation may change. <br /> | ||
+ | For this reason is critical monitoring and controlling whether a formerly identified positive outcome is still adding value to the company. | ||
− | + | The manager should realise, through the risks and KPIs related to other part of the programs (such as financial, safety…) , whether these affect or not the benefits delivery. | |
On the contrary, the impact, that the benefits’ delivery may have on the program or on the company, should be implemented in the general issues and risk management. | On the contrary, the impact, that the benefits’ delivery may have on the program or on the company, should be implemented in the general issues and risk management. | ||
− | + | It is also fundamental seeking the opportunity for new benefits to be implemented in the program benefits list as the program advance or a change occur. Indeed during the program evolution new opportunity may arise and is important to be '''proactive''' and ready to gain a positive outcome. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
== Sustain Benefits == | == Sustain Benefits == | ||
− | The last part of the Benefits Realisation Management | + | The last part of the Benefits Realisation Management '''ensures''', regardless of which is the program outcome, it will still be adding value to the organisation, even beyond the program end. <br /> |
− | In point of fact is necessary | + | In point of fact is necessary, even when a program is closed, its positive outcomes are '''sustained''' and '''managed''' to keep their principal scope. <ref name=Fra/> |
− | First of all, the benefits sustainment | + | First of all, the benefits sustainment ought be considered '''prior''' the end of the program.<br /> |
− | Most of the | + | Most of the organisations with a great experience in BRM use to define a plan of sustainment in the beginning part of a program.<br /> |
− | In fact, even though this plan regards a period of time | + | In fact, even though this plan regards a period of time which is outside the one of the program life cycle, the program manager has the responsibility to create the above. |
− | More specifically, a benefits sustainment plan should be created before the end of the program, and it should include all the | + | More specifically, a '''benefits sustainment plan''' should be created before the end of the program, and it should include all the risks, the measures and the tools to guarantee that the delivered benefits will be continuing generating value.<br /> |
− | The importance of a quality sustainment plan lies on the fact that after an end of a program the management of the benefits pass to | + | The importance of a quality sustainment plan lies on the fact that after an end of a program the management of the benefits pass to others. <br /> |
− | Consequently, the | + | Consequently, the clearer and competently developed the plan is, the better the new organisation will manage those benefits. <ref name=Sus> PMI Sustain benefits to optimize |
+ | business value (2016). Available from https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/sustain-project-benefits-optimize-value.pdf </ref> | ||
− | Moreover, once the program finishes is critical to effettuate a post-program evaluation. Indeed | + | Moreover, once the program finishes is critical to effettuate a '''post-program evaluation'''. <br /> |
− | Firstly, is important to comprehend wether the benefits have been greatly update and optimised with the stakeholders and efficiently delivered. | + | Indeed this practice can give important and useful informations for the future. <br /> |
− | Secondly, the lessons that the team group or the manager have learned during the program development should be really understood and shared. | + | Firstly, is important to comprehend wether the benefits have been greatly update and optimised with the stakeholders and efficiently delivered. <br /> |
− | Indeed, the only way to avoid the same errors in the future programs benefits realisation management, is that the lessons are deeply comprehended by all the interested people. | + | Secondly, the lessons that the team group or the manager have learned during the program development should be really understood and shared. <br /> |
+ | Indeed, the only way to avoid the same errors in the future programs benefits realisation management, is that the lessons are deeply comprehended by all the interested people. <ref name=Fra/> | ||
Furthermore, the new benefits gained during the execution phase, the ones that were not planned, have to be collected and comprehended by all the involved people. | Furthermore, the new benefits gained during the execution phase, the ones that were not planned, have to be collected and comprehended by all the involved people. | ||
− | + | In some case, beyond the program, new benefits for the future may be identified. If it occurs they would have to become a part of the future positive outcomes of the organisation. | |
Some of the activities that may help the sustainment of the benefits are: | Some of the activities that may help the sustainment of the benefits are: | ||
− | Implementing the right changes to make sure | + | *'''Implementing''' the right changes to make sure, even though the resources used for the program will be back to the organisation, the positive outcomes performance will be monitored. |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | *'''Monitoring''' the risk defined in the sustainment plan for the delivered benefits and implement the right changes if needed. <ref name=Pmithesta/> | ||
=Limitations of Benefits Realisation Management = | =Limitations of Benefits Realisation Management = | ||
− | It is now more clear what is the benefits realisation management, why is important and how to best perform it. However, sometimes its application could be more difficult and complicated in comparison to how it appears. The main limitations of this method are related to: | + | It is now more clear what is the benefits realisation management, why it is important and how to best perform it. |
+ | However, sometimes its application could be more difficult and complicated in comparison to how it appears. The main '''limitations''' of this method are related to: | ||
'''BENEFITS:''' | '''BENEFITS:''' | ||
− | As just was previously mentioned, the benefits are sometimes uncertain and unquantifiable. | + | As just was previously mentioned, the benefits are sometimes '''uncertain''' and '''unquantifiable'''. <br /> |
− | If the program contains many of those working with the | + | Besides, they may be interdependent with many others internal and external elements. <br /> |
− | However, an analysis of those benefits, still will help the organisation in the program success better than if the benefits realisation management would have not been done. | + | If the program contains many of those kind of benefits, working with the BRM could be really laborious and complicated. <br /> |
+ | However, an accurate analysis of those benefits, still will help the organisation in the program success better than if the benefits realisation management would have not been done. <ref name= Pmithesta/> | ||
'''STAKEHOLDERS:''' | '''STAKEHOLDERS:''' | ||
− | An other possible limitation that may be arise during the use of this method is a discrepancy between the stakeholders visions. Indeed benefits may have different impact on different stakeholders, hence some of theme may not shared the positive effect of an outcome and consider them as a dis-benefits. | + | An other possible limitation that may be arise during the use of this method is a discrepancy between the '''stakeholders visions''' and the manager one.<br /> |
+ | Indeed benefits may have different impact on different stakeholders, hence some of theme may not shared the positive effect of an outcome and consider them as a dis-benefits.<br /> | ||
In this occasion this stakeholders will try to oppone themselves to the program to avoid it impact them negatively. If these benefits will arrive at unacceptable level for those stakeholders, they could be a threaten for the program itself. | In this occasion this stakeholders will try to oppone themselves to the program to avoid it impact them negatively. If these benefits will arrive at unacceptable level for those stakeholders, they could be a threaten for the program itself. | ||
− | It is critical to find a way to reduce the impact of this dis-benefits, in order to decrease the risk of failure of the program. | + | It is critical to find a way to reduce the impact of this dis-benefits, in order to decrease the risk of failure of the program. <ref name=Msp/> |
− | In short Benefits Realisation Management requires experience and practice, but a correct use of it can really make the difference in the success of a program. | + | In short, Benefits Realisation Management requires experience and practice, but a correct use of it can really make the difference in the success of a program. |
= Annotated Bibliography = | = Annotated Bibliography = | ||
Line 219: | Line 250: | ||
'''Project Management Institute - The standard for program management (2017)''' | '''Project Management Institute - The standard for program management (2017)''' | ||
− | Chapter 4- This chapter “Program Benefits Management” briefly | + | Chapter 4- This chapter “Program Benefits Management” briefly introduces the concept of benefits and their importance. Further, it analyses the main activities conducted during a benefits management operation. Some of the techniques introduced in this article are deeper explained and analysed in this chapter. It also presents the Benefits Management through the use of subdivision of the steps and it could give a different point of view about the topic. |
+ | Further, the Book may be useful for a deeper understanding of the program management which leads to a better comprehension of the Benefits realisation management. | ||
'''Carlos Eduardo Martin Serra-Benefits realisation management (2016)''' | '''Carlos Eduardo Martin Serra-Benefits realisation management (2016)''' | ||
− | Chapter 1- | + | Chapter 1- It Introduces the concept of benefits realisation management and present an overview on why it is a powerful instrument for a program success. In particular, this chapter shows the relation between the business success and the outcomes of the programs. |
+ | Moreover, in this book are presented many case studies, in order to better comprehend how the benefits are managed in real programs. | ||
'''Project Management Institute - Benefits realization management framework (2016)''' | '''Project Management Institute - Benefits realization management framework (2016)''' | ||
− | These slides present an overview of the method that was discussed in this article. They were used as a guide line for the structure of the method. | + | These slides present an overview of the method that was discussed in this article. They were used as a guide line for the structure of the method. Moreover, they can be a great start point to approach the BRM. |
'''PMI - Benefits Realization Management: practical guide (2019)''' | '''PMI - Benefits Realization Management: practical guide (2019)''' | ||
− | + | As the title explains, the book is a practical guide for the BRM. | |
+ | It was mainly used to clarify some of the concept that need a deep understanding. In particular this book was used to comprehend the tools used in benefits realisation management and theirs templates. | ||
+ | However, the book explains the stages of BRM and outlines the different use among project, program and portfolio management. | ||
'''Axelos- Managing Successful Programmes (2011)''' | '''Axelos- Managing Successful Programmes (2011)''' | ||
− | Chapter 7- "Benefits Management”, this chapter | + | Chapter 7- "Benefits Management”, this chapter introduces the management of the benefits and illustrates the main approaches and phases in dealing with them. This chapter also shows the main problems which arise working with the benefits management and outlines possible tips to avoid those undesired situations. |
+ | The book presents also the other activities of the program management which, as just mentioned, are helpful to understand the importance of the BRM. | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
+ | [[User:EdoBraa|EdoBraa]] ([[User talk:EdoBraa|talk]]) |
Latest revision as of 22:35, 4 March 2019
Contents |
[edit] Abstract
Benefits Realisation Management or BRM, is a method used in management to define and measure the value that a project, program or portfolio management will bring into a company.[1]
The BRM is based on identify and work with the benefits of a determinate project, program or portfolio.
Although the method and its techniques can be used either for a project, program or a portfolio, this article will cover the BRM related to a program.
This article will also discuss the relation between the method and the success of a determinate program.
The benefits realisation management purpose is to identify the benefits that the organisation is going to acquire. Moreover, the BRM aligns the benefits with the interest and the vision statement of the company and it, also, strongly increases the possibility that they will be gained. Indeed, one of the key point of the benefits realisation management is not only to define the benefits, but as well to decrease the possible risks related to these benefits.
The BRM method can be decomposed in three different steps : identify benefits, execute benefits and sustain benefits.[1]
Firstly, it is important to understand whether a project, program or portfolio management will add value to the company. Secondly, the addition of new benefits and the decrease of risk in the existing one. Finally, during the sustainment process, the manager ensures whatever the project or program produces will keep adding value to the company beyond the end of the program.
These three aspects of the method and their techniques will be deeply discussed in detail further on the article.
Even though using the benefit realisation management brings to the company many advantages, it also has some limitations which will be introduced and analysed.
[edit] Introduction to Benefits
The term benefits refers to all the outcomes of a program which increase or add value to the organisation or the stakeholders.
“Benefits are measurable and quantifiable improvements, which are normally expressed in financial terms, so they can justify any investment that may be required from the business”. [2]
Different kinds of benefits may be generated by a program, and even if they have all positive effects they may require different approaches.
Indeed, although some of the benefits are certain or are related to a specific condition or achievement, others may be difficult to predict or highly uncertain.[3]
Furthermore, the benefits may be either quantifiable or unquantifiable.
Indeed, if they are not financial benefits, the measurement of them may be difficult.
To give an example the increase of employee satisfaction with a program is not as quantifiable and predictable as the achievement of a precise quote on the market.
Besides, the three Es is another possible classification for the benefits, which allows to cover, organise and manage the majority of them. The three categories are:
- ECONOMIC BENEFITS: all the positive benefits related with the financial aspect and the cashflow.
- EFFECTIVENESS BENEFITS: Improvement on the standard
- EFFICIENCY BENEFITS: Improvement on the allocation of resources. [4]
Moving forward to the characteristics of benefits, they often have a defined beneficiar and it may be either the company, the stakeholders or even the customers. By the way, even though the direct beneficiar is not the organisation, the latter may also gain value from delivery benefits to others. In fact, an improved or a new ability of constantly deliver and sustain the products or services, can benefit the organisation. [3]
On the other hand, if the defined beneficiaries of a program do not realise the advantage of an outcome, it could have negative impact on the sponsor of the program. Some stakeholders may see the benefit as a negative outcome for them: dis-benefit.[4]
Consequently, is important to minimise this risk by communicating the benefits and aligning them with the interest of the beneficiaries. Every stakeholders must be aware of the positive outcomes of a program and how the benefits contribute achieving the main company’s objectives. [3]
The benefits of a program do not have a specific period. Indeed, they may be delivered during the development of the program by one of its activities. For instance a project within the program may end and produce a positive outcome for the company, even when the program has not ended. Besides, they may be provide when the program finishes or, furthermore, they can be shown after the closure of it.
The value gap, between the real situation of the company and the future desired one, may be filled with all the benefits provided by all the successful programs. [2]
[edit] Relation between benefits and success of a program
In the last 20 years most of the companies (60%-80% according to a study conducted in 2008 by Kaplan and Norton) failing to deliver the expected outcomes of their projects, consequently even the business strategies come to nothing. [2]
Decide whether a program is successful or not can create some ambiguity.
Indeed, most of the time it depends on the criteria that are chosen to evaluate it.
As a matter of fact even though a program ends within the expected budget and perfectly in time, it may be a failure in terms of additional value acquired by the company.
On the contrary, it could happen that the outcomes provided by a program outweigh the failure in terms of cost and timing.
In point of fact, is not sufficient that the outcomes are positive if they are not aligned with the interests of the organisation.
In order to increase the value of the company a program should generate benefits that help the company in achieving its main objectives, in order to aim for both the success of the program and the company. [2]
To give an example, a t-shirt company which would like to compete in the sport sector may be able to produce the products perfectly on time and budget and sell all of them, but not in another market. Still, all these positive aspects do not add the aimed value to the company, nor move it towards it's objective.
In short, the success of a program is achieved when the gained benefits are aligned with how an organisation would like to improve. Consequently, the Benefits realisation management may be fundamental for the purpose of a successful program and achievement of the business strategies. [2]
[edit] What is BMR and why is it important?
The Benefits realisation management consists in a series of processes which aim to ensure a program outcomes will increase the value of a company.
Moreover, this method measure this value and manage, during the development of the program, the risks related to it. [1]
The BMR plays a critical role in program management.
In fact, it allows the manager to understand whether the impact, the program will have on the organisation, will be positive or not.
Furthermore, this method helps the program manager to recognise and realise the amount of resources and effort, which will be implied in the program, necessary to deliver the identified benefits.
As just mentioned before, the BRM Framework consist of three step that will be further deeply explained.
First of all, the manager will establish whether a program can produce value to the organisation.
In order to do so the identification of the possible benefits of the program is necessary.
Indeed, a project could have benefits that are not aligned with the vision statement of the company or with the will of the stakeholders, consequently it would move the organisation towards an undesired direction.
For this reason, is important, during the planning, deeply understand if the program can decrease the value gap between the current position and the desired one.
Otherwise, the positive outcomes are not necessary for the organisation and they do not justify the implementation of the resources in the program.
In fact, all the benefits should be understood as a result, due to the fact they are the main reason a program starts. [2]
Secondly, this method point to achieve the minimum risk possible for each of the existing benefits. Indeed, most of them may be compromised during the development of the projects within the program, therefore is enormously important keep monitoring and managing the benefits even when the program has started. The intermediate benefits, that the projects, within the program, may deliver, are as important as the final ones. Indeed, the achievement of those benefits will increase the commitment and the focus on the program. Besides, seeing the deliveries of these benefits, the stakeholders will be more supportive. [4]
Most of the time benefits are dynamic, hence monitor them may decrease the risk related to their acquirement. Besides, a risk structure of the benefits should be created in agreement with the risk appetite of the company. Furthermore, the benefits realisation management has the purpose to increase the possibility to gain new benefits. Indeed, during the development of the project new possible benefits could arise and more value may be added by them inclusion.
Finally, is important that whatever will be the outcome of the program, it will be adding value to the organisation and the stakeholders, even though the program has ended. One of the goals of the BRM is to ensure that the whoever is going to manage the program outcomes will be able to sustain the positive impacts on the business.
These three different phases can be identified respectively as: Identify benefits, Execute benefits and sustain benefits. [1]
The Benefits realisation management allows the manager of a program to link the reasons of it with the impact that its delivery will have on the business.
The crucial reason to implement the BRM in a program is to move forward to the achievement of the business principal goals. In order to succeed in the business strategy the organisation has to execute a series of program successfully. [2] To identify what success looks like in a program the knowledge of business goals is necessary.[5] Indeed, knowing the objectives of the organisation and the positive outcomes of the program, the decisions of how many resources use on it or whether it ought be prioritised or not, become easier.
The management of the benefits is a crucial aspect in the program management because, most of the time, benefits are the reason to justify the cost. In fact the positive outcomes of a program (benefits) are the main reason behind the investment. If one can ensure to have the benefits and, besides, these benefits are aligned with the goals of the company, consequently, the possibility that the program will be a success increase. [3]
Even in the change management the BMR has a critical role. Companies decide to change to obtain benefits. Hence, to implement, justify and support a change is of great significance to identify its benefits.. [6]
Since the resources of an organisation are not unlimited, the use of benefits realisation management improves the quality of the choices of an organisation. Indeed, if a company knows a program’s positive outcomes are not oriented with the vision statement, it will avoid the implementation of resources in a wrong direction. As a consequence of this, both the misuse of resources decrees and the right path of success is reinforced.
Shortly, the BRM maximises the effectiveness of a company.[2]
[edit] Benefits Realisation Management Framework
As introduced in the previous chapter the Benefits Realisation Management includes three main phases through which it is possible to identify, manage and ensure the benefits of a program. Each of these stages may also implement the use of practices and techniques which will be briefly described.
[edit] Identify Benefits
The purpose of this first step, previously outlined, is to comprehend if the benefits of a program are aligned with the business plan of the company, in order to bring value to it.
Besides, a diligent analysis, of the individualised benefits, will improve their further managing. In order to pursue the right benefits a deeply understanding of the business case of the organisation is necessary. [5]
As just mentioned before, the benefits should be identified and qualified through a process of analysation using all the available informations about the program.
As more informations arise, it is also important define the possible positive and negative risk related to the identified benefits. To give examples of these risks, they may be the disagreement from the stakeholders, unexpected outcomes or change in program activities.
In the "Identify Benefit" phase the key performance indicators (KPIs) should be pointed out.
Those are indicators which will help the manager of the program to follow the actual state of delivery of the benefits during the developing of the program.
They will, also, allow him to compare these result with the planned ones.
Besides, the decisions of the future monitoring and controlling processes should be developed in this stage.
Furthermore, it is important to classify these benefits in terms of time and life span. For this reason, the timing and the dependencies of each benefit should also be identified and communicate. Indeed, this practice will help the monitoring part to understand whether a benefit will be on time and what could be the problems which affect it.
Different tools can be used to quantify, plan and give a profile to these benefits such as: benefits register, benefits map or a benefit profile.
- BENEFITS REGISTER:
The Benefit register is a document which includes and lists all the benefits of a program.
Its scope is to measure and share, during the development of the program, the delivery of those benefits.
The benefits register ought be update during the benefits analysis and planning.
In fact, a first development of this document is written during the identification of benefits, then an update version is create in collaboration with the stakeholders.
It is fundamental, in this update, to determine the key performance indicators that will be used to monitor the benefits performances during the program development. [3] [5]
- BENEFITS MAP:
The benefits map is a visual representation which relates the benefits with all the surrounding elements which have a cause-effect relation with them.
The interdependency among the benefits and any element which can affect their delivery should be shown on the map.
Indeed, even though some outcomes failure may be negligible for the success of the program, they may strongly affect the benefit realisation. [4]
- BENEFIT PROFILE:
The benefit profile is a description of the benefit and its main characteristics.
Informations such as what is the benefit, who is the beneficiar, the timing and the criteria to measure it, are written in this document.
It helps in the analysis and planning of the benefits. Moreover, it becomes a part of the previously introduced Benefit register.
Furthermore [5]
It is critical that the stakeholders or the sponsor of the program approve the benefits that arise from those studies. Besides, the communication plan of these benefits future progress is also established in this stage. A deep analysis of the stakeholders power and their idea about the benefits should be developed. The benefits distribution of the stakeholders matrix may help with this task. [3] [5]
Once all the benefits will be identified and classified, the attention will move to understand if these positive outcomes of the program are aligned with the vision statement or the business goals of the company.
[edit] Execute Benefits
In the "Execute Benefits" part of the methods the manager will guarantee the minimum risk for each previously outlined benefit and, in addition, he will focus on the discovery of possible new benefits that may be gained. [1]
One of the first step, on this stage of the Benefits Realisation Management, is to confirm that the stakeholders have deeply comprehended the positive outcomes of the program and how this benefits are going to affect in a positive way the business.
This ensures that when the benefits will have been delivered they will see them as a gained value.
Moreover, the stakeholders must be informed about the progresses and deliveries of these benefits.
It is critical that the stakeholders will act in harmony with the benefits of the program, therefore they should be aware, also, of the dependencies related to these outcomes. [1] [4]
Besides, the team, which is working with the program, should deeply understand the importance and the impact of these benefits on the business of the company. In fact, they are the most involved people with the program deliveries and changes.
The process between the benefits analysis and planning and their delivery is not a linear process.
Indeed it is most of the time an iterative process, in which corrective action are continuously necessary as the planned conditions change. This informations about the environment come from the continuous monitoring of the organisation.
The progresses of the benefits have to be continuously reviewed to realise if some change, in the program activities, may be needed, in order to move the the positive outcomes closer to the original expectation.
These progresses can be monitored using the previously defined measures and key indicators.
During all the duration of the program is critical that benefits will be continuously reviewed to better reflect the ongoing business objectives. This will avoid that benefits, identified before a program beginning, will be no longer an adding value for the company at the moment of the delivery. [3]
In fact, it is possible that with the development of the project the business goals of the organisation may change.
For this reason is critical monitoring and controlling whether a formerly identified positive outcome is still adding value to the company.
The manager should realise, through the risks and KPIs related to other part of the programs (such as financial, safety…) , whether these affect or not the benefits delivery. On the contrary, the impact, that the benefits’ delivery may have on the program or on the company, should be implemented in the general issues and risk management.
It is also fundamental seeking the opportunity for new benefits to be implemented in the program benefits list as the program advance or a change occur. Indeed during the program evolution new opportunity may arise and is important to be proactive and ready to gain a positive outcome.
[edit] Sustain Benefits
The last part of the Benefits Realisation Management ensures, regardless of which is the program outcome, it will still be adding value to the organisation, even beyond the program end.
In point of fact is necessary, even when a program is closed, its positive outcomes are sustained and managed to keep their principal scope. [1]
First of all, the benefits sustainment ought be considered prior the end of the program.
Most of the organisations with a great experience in BRM use to define a plan of sustainment in the beginning part of a program.
In fact, even though this plan regards a period of time which is outside the one of the program life cycle, the program manager has the responsibility to create the above.
More specifically, a benefits sustainment plan should be created before the end of the program, and it should include all the risks, the measures and the tools to guarantee that the delivered benefits will be continuing generating value.
The importance of a quality sustainment plan lies on the fact that after an end of a program the management of the benefits pass to others.
Consequently, the clearer and competently developed the plan is, the better the new organisation will manage those benefits. [7]
Moreover, once the program finishes is critical to effettuate a post-program evaluation.
Indeed this practice can give important and useful informations for the future.
Firstly, is important to comprehend wether the benefits have been greatly update and optimised with the stakeholders and efficiently delivered.
Secondly, the lessons that the team group or the manager have learned during the program development should be really understood and shared.
Indeed, the only way to avoid the same errors in the future programs benefits realisation management, is that the lessons are deeply comprehended by all the interested people. [1]
Furthermore, the new benefits gained during the execution phase, the ones that were not planned, have to be collected and comprehended by all the involved people.
In some case, beyond the program, new benefits for the future may be identified. If it occurs they would have to become a part of the future positive outcomes of the organisation.
Some of the activities that may help the sustainment of the benefits are:
- Implementing the right changes to make sure, even though the resources used for the program will be back to the organisation, the positive outcomes performance will be monitored.
- Monitoring the risk defined in the sustainment plan for the delivered benefits and implement the right changes if needed. [3]
[edit] Limitations of Benefits Realisation Management
It is now more clear what is the benefits realisation management, why it is important and how to best perform it. However, sometimes its application could be more difficult and complicated in comparison to how it appears. The main limitations of this method are related to:
BENEFITS:
As just was previously mentioned, the benefits are sometimes uncertain and unquantifiable.
Besides, they may be interdependent with many others internal and external elements.
If the program contains many of those kind of benefits, working with the BRM could be really laborious and complicated.
However, an accurate analysis of those benefits, still will help the organisation in the program success better than if the benefits realisation management would have not been done. [3]
STAKEHOLDERS:
An other possible limitation that may be arise during the use of this method is a discrepancy between the stakeholders visions and the manager one.
Indeed benefits may have different impact on different stakeholders, hence some of theme may not shared the positive effect of an outcome and consider them as a dis-benefits.
In this occasion this stakeholders will try to oppone themselves to the program to avoid it impact them negatively. If these benefits will arrive at unacceptable level for those stakeholders, they could be a threaten for the program itself.
It is critical to find a way to reduce the impact of this dis-benefits, in order to decrease the risk of failure of the program. [4]
In short, Benefits Realisation Management requires experience and practice, but a correct use of it can really make the difference in the success of a program.
[edit] Annotated Bibliography
Project Management Institute - The standard for program management (2017)
Chapter 4- This chapter “Program Benefits Management” briefly introduces the concept of benefits and their importance. Further, it analyses the main activities conducted during a benefits management operation. Some of the techniques introduced in this article are deeper explained and analysed in this chapter. It also presents the Benefits Management through the use of subdivision of the steps and it could give a different point of view about the topic. Further, the Book may be useful for a deeper understanding of the program management which leads to a better comprehension of the Benefits realisation management.
Carlos Eduardo Martin Serra-Benefits realisation management (2016)
Chapter 1- It Introduces the concept of benefits realisation management and present an overview on why it is a powerful instrument for a program success. In particular, this chapter shows the relation between the business success and the outcomes of the programs. Moreover, in this book are presented many case studies, in order to better comprehend how the benefits are managed in real programs.
Project Management Institute - Benefits realization management framework (2016)
These slides present an overview of the method that was discussed in this article. They were used as a guide line for the structure of the method. Moreover, they can be a great start point to approach the BRM.
PMI - Benefits Realization Management: practical guide (2019)
As the title explains, the book is a practical guide for the BRM. It was mainly used to clarify some of the concept that need a deep understanding. In particular this book was used to comprehend the tools used in benefits realisation management and theirs templates. However, the book explains the stages of BRM and outlines the different use among project, program and portfolio management.
Axelos- Managing Successful Programmes (2011)
Chapter 7- "Benefits Management”, this chapter introduces the management of the benefits and illustrates the main approaches and phases in dealing with them. This chapter also shows the main problems which arise working with the benefits management and outlines possible tips to avoid those undesired situations. The book presents also the other activities of the program management which, as just mentioned, are helpful to understand the importance of the BRM.
[edit] References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 PMI Benefits realization management Framework (2016)
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 Serra C. E. M. Benefits realization management: Benefits Realization Management: Strategic Value from Portfolios, Programs, and Projects (Best Practices in Portfolio, Program, and Project Management) (2016)
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 PMI The Standard for Program Management, Pennsylvania (2017)
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 Axelos Managing Successful Programmes (2011). Available from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.proxy.findit.dtu.dk/lib/dtudk/reader.action?docID=4462753
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 PMI Benefit Realization Management Practice Guide (2019). Available from https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/practice-guides/benefits-realization
- ↑ John Hayes - The Theory and Practice of Change Management-Palgrave (2014)
- ↑ PMI Sustain benefits to optimize business value (2016). Available from https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/sustain-project-benefits-optimize-value.pdf